Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

The Weather Thread 2024


airwaves

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Superscally said:

Excellent. All of this. Especially the fact that Corey must be feeling better.

Hopefully he's hitting a good place. Corey was my surprise of the day... Brilliant. Never really got into Slipknot, outside of the obvious more popular songs... But my god that voice is incredible!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Alvoram said:

Hopefully he's hitting a good place. Corey was my surprise of the day... Brilliant. Never really got into Slipknot, outside of the obvious more popular songs... But my god that voice is incredible!!! 

Offtopic, so soz everyone else, but how were Machine Head? I bloody love a bit of Machine Head! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, compactdisc said:

Could someone please explain the difference between the operational run and all of the others?

As I understand it, the GFS Operational is a single forecast, the Mean is the average of multiple runs (with multiple different outcomes) so the more extreme elements are removed from the picture. It's basically the average of the forecasts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, compactdisc said:

Could someone please explain the difference between the operational run and all of the others?

 

GFS Operational Runs are high-resolution weather forecasting models that use a single set of initial conditions to predict weather. They are the main models used for forecasting.

GFS Ensemble Runs are multiple forecasts run together but with slightly different initial conditions. This approach helps to account for uncertainties in the weather prediction process by showing a range of possible outcomes.

 

If the operational run gets a low pressure off by 10 miles then this could cause a spiral as forecast after forecast compound the mistake (a forecast every 4 hours with the next based on the previous). What we want is agreement between the various runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Glasto Weatherwatch said:

As I understand it, the GFS Operational is a single forecast, the Mean is the average of multiple runs (with multiple different outcomes) so the more extreme elements are removed from the picture. It's basically the average of the forecasts. 

 

That's it, but the mean is the average of the low-res runs. The operational is the only high-res run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Glasto Weatherwatch said:

As I understand it, the GFS Operational is a single forecast, the Mean is the average of multiple runs (with multiple different outcomes) so the more extreme elements are removed from the picture. It's basically the average of the forecasts. 

 

My understanding is that the GFS operational runs at a higher resolution than it's ensembles. Each ensemble has a slightly different starting criteria which then can lead to a variety of different outcomes. The mean is just an average of all of the runs put together so is useful in seeing the overall trend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, balti-pie said:

Offtopic, so soz everyone else, but how were Machine Head? I bloody love a bit of Machine Head! 

I got dragged there kicking and screaming... I'm not a fan... HOWEVER, the person that dragged me there is a huge fan and was having an absolute blast, and the performance seemed good to me. I just enjoyed the fact he was enjoying it so much. He did say the playlist could have been better for him personally, and was really pissed off they hadn't played Halo at first, but they came back and did that, so all was forgiven. (Halo is great btw, even I can think that.) It was the most lively I'd seen him all day, despite the fact we were right at the back, so it was good to see.  

I can ask him which songs he wanted that weren't played if nobody else replies? 

Edited by Alvoram
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad everyone is so interested. Can we carry on the weather forecasting discussion?

 

As another point resolution is what you'd think i.e. the size of the grids on the ground.

 

The ECMWF has a higher resolution than GFS, and Met Office higher than ECMWF hence better accuracy.

 

This might be useful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Forecast_System

Edited by devonhammer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aragorn said:

image.thumb.png.a5f042fd9159c71dc3d6a23fea7b4697.png

 

image.thumb.png.00b603d4998430d29e5f091f1d7327b6.png

 

The operational run is somewhat more optimistic than the mean of all runs for the opening of the festival, the precipitation chart shows a number of runs are interested in bringing some rain in.  

 

 

 

That yellow run looks interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nobody Interesting said:

 

and YR updates to prove, if any proof was needed, that this is one big roller coaster we are all on.

image.thumb.png.d520111d2bf31adfdaf33a022f9245fc.png

YR is Norweigan and is the best forecaster if you're going to a festival in Scandinavia:

 

"The calculation of the weather’s development is made in a 3D grid. The squares in this grid are 2.5 kilometers wide for the Scandinavian region and around 9 kilometers for the rest of the world."

Weather forecasts on Yr - how are they made? – Yr help and information

Edited by devonhammer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, devonhammer said:

Glad everyone is so interested. Can we carry on the weather forecasting discussion?

 

As another point resolution is what you'd think i.e. the size of the grids on the ground.

 

The ECMWF has a higher resolution than GFS, and Met Office higher than ECMWF hence better accuracy.

 

This might be useful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Forecast_System

 

At the risk of going full geek on the science here, so you're saying that resolution means smaller grid areas and hence better accuracy on a micro level - i.e. c. 100 forecast data points as opposed to maybe 25 in a given area?  And the operational run uses the high resolution "micro" data, whereas the mean is an extrapolation of models using lower resolution?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

 

At the risk of going full geek on the science here.....                                                                                                                                                         

It was a risk and I'm afraid it's now an issue....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

 

At the risk of going full geek on the science here, so you're saying that resolution means smaller grid areas and hence better accuracy on a micro level - i.e. c. 100 forecast data points as opposed to maybe 25 in a given area?  And the operational run uses the high resolution "micro" data, whereas the mean is an extrapolation of models using lower resolution?

 

In a word, YES

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Alkaline Trio 90 Barrington Levy 95 Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 100 Billy Ocean 100 The Black Keys 90 Carl Cox 100 Chase & Status 115 Chelsea Wolfe 85  CMAT 105 Confidence Man 150 MAX Dave 25 David Byrne 145 Disclosure 65  Everything Everything 105 Faithless 80  Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 125  Funeral for a Friend 45 Garbage 100 GOAT 105  Greentea Peng 120 Happy Mondays 80 Hollie Cook 90 Jorja Smith 100 José González 100 Joy Crookes 120  Judas Priest 90 Kasabian 80  Kneecap 110  The Last Dinner Party 25 Levellers 85  Limp Bizkit 35  Linkin Park 90 Lorde 120 Madness 75  The Maccabees 100 Neck Deep 135  Nile Rodgers & Chic 100 Overmono 100 Pixies 55 (-10) The Prodigy 140 +10  Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 100 Ren 85 Richard Ashcroft 95  Say She She 85 Scissor Sisters 120 Self Esteem 120 Skunk Anansie 100 Stereolab 120  The Streets 110 Super Furry Animals 110 Tems 50  Thundercat 90 Tom Jones 70  Two Door Cinema Club 20 Tyler, the Creator 75 Underworld 115 Wet Leg 90  Wilco 95  The Wombats 90 Wolf Alice 135
    • The Great Fete Festival (Sunday Only) Ocean Colour Scene day on Tickets For Good.
    • I was also at Ghost but seated. When they scanned my ticket's and they came up as seated they printed a small ticket with the seat number info.
    • I was standing for Ghost at O2 London last year where they put the phone in a pouch beforehand so I assume they're is a mechanism in place for people in seats. 
    • Most likely not, keeping an eye on Tixel and Twickets might be the best option.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...