Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, clasher said:

Other sure, I'm under impression "headline Saturday" means the pyramid.

oh yeah agreed then. i just assumed other and thought that was something we were all very set on anyway haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if I even know a Lewis Capaldi song... And I don't mind pop music, quite like some of it. 

OK, so I obviously googled him after typing that and I do know some songs... One or two I quite like, but they all sound the same, and I find most of them quite boring... Fantastic pipes on the lad though... Not for me however, would be a boring headliner, and I'd be elsewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Alvoram said:

fantastic pipes on the lad though... Not for me however, would be a boring headliner, and I'd be elsewhere

Cracking voice and a funny guy but yeah, his songs are very samey.

Would go down well in the afternoon / evening but is a very safe and bland headliner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Freddyflintstonree said:

OK now it's just getting weird. That's a lot of money being thrown at someone that hasn't even really been discussed on here? 

Screenshot_20221219_114543_Adblock Browser.jpg

It’s been said before but worth saying again, the market for Glastonbury headliners must be incredibly small. A few tenner bets would be enough to shift the odds considerably. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

It’s been said before but worth saying again, the market for Glastonbury headliners must be incredibly small. A few tenner bets would be enough to shift the odds considerably. 

True, but I think a move from more than 8-1 (can't see exactly as didn't screenshot beyond the first page) into evens for Capaldi who hasn't even been suggested on here, certainly not recently, suggests something somewhere has prompted a fair number of bets. 

Edit: especially bearing in mind its a sudden jump in the betting, not a slow move. 

Edited by Freddyflintstonree
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Lewis Capaldi is the level at which is being settled upon for the suitability to headline, I'd much prefer they gave the slot to Lizzo for a multitude of reasons. FWIW, I don't think either are ready (and certainly very unlikely) but as we're discussing the possibility based upon some strange betting data, it's worth making a comparison

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Freddyflintstonree said:

suggests something somewhere has prompted a fair number of bets.

odds worth betting on, the odds are so bad for the others they're not worth the bother.

anyone having a punt, will put their money where it'd be worthwhile winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

If Lewis Capaldi is the level at which is being settled upon for the suitability to headline, I'd much prefer they gave the slot to Lizzo for a multitude of reasons. FWIW, I don't think either are ready (and certainly very unlikely) but as we're discussing the possibility based upon some strange betting data, it's worth making a comparison

Yep the main one being she's at least a million times better than him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

has anything ruled Beyonce out of the Sat night headline spot? You'd imagine she has a good relationship with the festival after headlining in 2011, it'd be a great balance of headliners with Arctics and Elton, and we know there's a 2023 world tour coming as she auctioned off backstage tickets, and flights to one of the shows.

Odd that she hasn't announced the tour yet already imo, as that auction was 2 months ago. Perhaps there's a festival headline show holding the announcement up... (appreciate most likely wishful thinking)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, HamishA. said:

has anything ruled Beyonce out of the Sat night headline spot?

I'm manifesting this. As you say, we already know she has stuff to announced, I think a return to Glasto after a phenomenal album this year would be just great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...