Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

In an argument someone asked what I do, and I said i'm furloughed at the moment. Then they responded with "and who do you think pays for that furlough??? thats right, the great british empire!!! of which the queen is HEAD OF STATE!!! so have some respect!!!!"

How thick are these people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Gilgamesh69 said:

In an argument someone asked what I do, and I said i'm furloughed at the moment. Then they responded with "and who do you think pays for that furlough??? thats right, the great british empire!!! of which the queen is HEAD OF STATE!!! so have some respect!!!!"

How thick are these people?

It's not even worth wasting your breath arguing with these morons!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

ffs are they trying to get the viewer numbers up for the funeral by removing all the alternatives 😞 

Still will not work

 

Pub gardens are open 🙂

Edited by fred quimby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, gigpusher said:

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/apr/12/bbcs-prince-philip-coverage-breaks-uk-tv-complaints-record

 

Looks like at least we're not alone. If anyone was annoyed by the coverage I'd encourage you to submit a complaint. 

I already did - mine is one of the 100,000 reported. I think it's actually quite significant when you consider that the next two most complained about things (Jerry Springer and Russell Brand) were huge media furores at the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Quark said:

Already have 😄

I did as well as did my husband. Was tempted to do it on behalf of the dogs as well 😄 

2 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

I already did - mine is one of the 100,000 reported. I think it's actually quite significant when you consider that the next two most complained about things (Jerry Springer and Russell Brand) were huge media furores at the time. 

Yes they can ignore whines on Facebook or Twitter but hopefully not official complaints. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing is, I genuinely find it sad that he's died.  Regardless of my thoughts on the monarchy as an institution, a 94 year old woman has lost her husband of 70+ years and that's going to be horrendous regardless of how much money you've got.  I don't believe him to have been someone that made the world a worse place by his existence, so I certainly don't take an joy in his passing.

But the blanket coverage thing was nuts. For an organisation like the BBC that's supposed to be a service to the entire population that funds it, how can it be justified that everyone is expected to feel the same way about it?

It'll still be a black and white issue that's used to batter people with in the bullshit culture war though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The blanket coverage was nuts. But I didn't complain myself. As someone who doesn't pay the TV license, I don't feel it's my place to complain about the BBC. It does highlight how different people's attitudes to the BBC are, I think some people hold them to a higher standard than they do other broadcasters, because they are seen as 'nationalised'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Quark said:

Thing is, I genuinely find it sad that he's died.  Regardless of my thoughts on the monarchy as an institution, a 94 year old woman has lost her husband of 70+ years and that's going to be horrendous regardless of how much money you've got.  I don't believe him to have been someone that made the world a worse place by his existence, so I certainly don't take an joy in his passing.

But the blanket coverage thing was nuts. For an organisation like the BBC that's supposed to be a service to the entire population that funds it, how can it be justified that everyone is expected to feel the same way about it?

It'll still be a black and white issue that's used to batter people with in the bullshit culture war though

Yeah of course it's sad someone died. I didn't like the guy from what I've heard of him but I didn't know him and of course sad for the family.

But the blanket coverage was insane. Let one channel do it for the weird royalists and let the rest of us crack on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, maelzoid said:

The blanket coverage was nuts. But I didn't complain myself. As someone who doesn't pay the TV license, I don't feel it's my place to complain about the BBC. It does highlight how different people's attitudes to the BBC are, I think some people hold them to a higher standard than they do other broadcasters, because they are seen as 'nationalised'.

I pay a licence fee so that's part of why I complained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incidentally the whole Phil issue nearly started an argument with my dad when I saw him for the first time since August on Saturday! My dad was saying how respectful he thought it was that Planet Rock switched to slow reflective songs. The Duke loved a bit of Dire Straits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, maelzoid said:

The blanket coverage was nuts. But I didn't complain myself. As someone who doesn't pay the TV license, I don't feel it's my place to complain about the BBC. It does highlight how different people's attitudes to the BBC are, I think some people hold them to a higher standard than they do other broadcasters, because they are seen as 'nationalised'.

I think they have to be.  If you want to watch or record live tv on any platform (including the streaming subscription services) then you have to pay for a licence.  Their remit and responsibilities are also markedly different from private broadcasters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Same’s happened at MSG recently with Rush and Phish alternating nights. I guess each band has its own unique production so their riggers will be kept busy
    • The rumour was uk arena tour late this year.  Same as Charli xcx cant be announced until Reading headline is done.   
    • Latest from the sun at least is that harry is still headlining but Olivia has turned down a spot next year to work on new music and hope for 2028.   So they can't have Fender, Fontaines, Harry, Olivia and Madonna. 
    • I mean I don't think EC and FFDP are borderline sub, they wouldn't be any lower now.   2025 is about as strong as Bloodstock gets yet this year only one headline would sub and the others would play 3rd down or lower.    Machine Head wouldn't sub at Download regardless of rarity, they don't sell enough tickets and I'm not sure Gojira would sub either. Their last UK tour was a mix of smaller arenas and academy dates. Ally Pally being the only London date, not even Wembley Arena. 
    • live music / main stage will generally end around 11pm but theres dj’s and late goings on right till 4am if you are so inclined.   Drinks are about £7.50 a pint probably and yes theres lots of mixed drinks / spirits / cocktails available to buy   wonderful festival, back for my third year in a row and 4th overall
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...