Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Plans that they were totally allowed to make A FEW DAYS AGO.

If you’re not in this situation (trying to leave London before going to Tier4) I honestly think you have no opinion on the matter. 

I don’t want to be a dick but were those trips happening now really “allowed” a few days ago if you’re following the advice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I can never tell whether Lucas was aware that was an absolute statement when he wrote it or not.

I don't think Lucas was aware of very much when putting together the prequels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Radiochicken said:

I don’t want to be a dick but were those trips happening now really “allowed” a few days ago if you’re following the advice?

Indeed. They may have been allowed a few days ago, but as we have all being saying on here for about a week - those plans would have been fucking stupid.

Of course the government has fucked up, but it's a pandemic, there's plenty of opportunity for us all to fuck this up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Their choice and you’re wrong to tut them for it if it’s a decision you haven’t had to make yourself. 

Maybe, but not the point. They shouldn't be absolved of the responsibility of their choices just because we have a shit government.

Also

Quote

The thing is, I do actually have a lot of sympathy for people doing what you're advocating. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who has seen even a few of my posts recently might be aware of just how important the opportunity to see my parents was to me.

After talking to my Mum earlier, it's off. I might have still been persuaded to go down - as my partner and I have been isolating, could get tested, drive down etc. - but I think my Mum just wants to be able to look her not-yet-retired former NHS colleagues in the eye and say that we did all we could to get this over with as fast as we can.

I'm not trying to make out I'm a martyr - and if I didn't live with my boyfriend or I was alone I'd undoubtedly make a different decision - but any sweeping statememts about whether people are "doing the right thing", or "falling for the Tories strategy" or whether or not they care or do not care about seeing their family enough, are quite frankly bullshit. 

This situation is shit for everyone. I have been furious at the government before. I've been disgusted. I've been apoplectic with rage. I've cried. I've never had my heart broken by them before, so this is new, and I will add it to the long list of grievances I have with them and their policies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really would like to be a fly on the wall and understand just what the fuck the strategy/thought process behind this government is, with regards to COVID. It's been clear as day there literally hasn't been one at all and they have been terrified of making decisions.

Ultimatley thats what you get for voting in a conservative government, they don't actually want to govern.

Edited by MrBarry465
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WestCountryGirl said:

Anyone who has seen even a few of my posts recently might be aware of just how important the opportunity to see my parents was to me.

After talking to my Mum earlier, it's off. I might have still been persuaded to go down - as my partner and I have been isolating, could get tested, drive down etc. - but I think my Mum just wants to be able to look her not-yet-retired former NHS colleagues in the eye and say that we did all we could to get this over with as fast as we can.

I'm not trying to make out I'm a martyr - and if I didn't live with my boyfriend or I was alone I'd undoubtedly make a different decision - but any sweeping statememts about whether people are "doing the right thing", or "falling for the Tories strategy" or whether or not they care or do not care about seeing their family enough, are quite frankly bullshit. 

This situation is shit for everyone. I have been furious at the government before. I've been disgusted. I've been apoplectic with rage. I've cried. I've never had my heart broken by them before, so this is new, and I will add it to the long list of grievances I have with them and their policies.

Out of upvotes. Fantastic post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WestCountryGirl said:

Anyone who has seen even a few of my posts recently might be aware of just how important the opportunity to see my parents was to me.

After talking to my Mum earlier, it's off. I might have still been persuaded to go down - as my partner and I have been isolating, could get tested, drive down etc. - but I think my Mum just wants to be able to look her not-yet-retired former NHS colleagues in the eye and say that we did all we could to get this over with as fast as we can.

I'm not trying to make out I'm a martyr - and if I didn't live with my boyfriend or I was alone I'd undoubtedly make a different decision - but any sweeping statememts about whether people are "doing the right thing", or "falling for the Tories strategy" or whether or not they care or do not care about seeing their family enough, are quite frankly bullshit. 

This situation is shit for everyone. I have been furious at the government before. I've been disgusted. I've been apoplectic with rage. I've cried. I've never had my heart broken by them before, so this is new, and I will add it to the long list of grievances I have with them and their policies.

Good on you. For what it's worth I think you've made the right decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I think I'm done here. Posters are on here slaughtering each other for having differing opinions on how to deal with the most difficult decisions many of us have ever had to make in our lives. I thought you were all better than that when I joined this community a few months ago. You are all falling into the trap that the Tories are praying for.

I might come back in the new year if people start being nicer to each other - we'll see!

To all the lovely people on here who look out for each other, merry Christmas and a happy new year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WestCountryGirl said:

Anyone who has seen even a few of my posts recently might be aware of just how important the opportunity to see my parents was to me.

After talking to my Mum earlier, it's off. I might have still been persuaded to go down - as my partner and I have been isolating, could get tested, drive down etc. - but I think my Mum just wants to be able to look her not-yet-retired former NHS colleagues in the eye and say that we did all we could to get this over with as fast as we can.

I'm not trying to make out I'm a martyr - and if I didn't live with my boyfriend or I was alone I'd undoubtedly make a different decision - but any sweeping statememts about whether people are "doing the right thing", or "falling for the Tories strategy" or whether or not they care or do not care about seeing their family enough, are quite frankly bullshit. 

This situation is shit for everyone. I have been furious at the government before. I've been disgusted. I've been apoplectic with rage. I've cried. I've never had my heart broken by them before, so this is new, and I will add it to the long list of grievances I have with them and their policies.

My heart goes out to you, I know many many people who are in the same situation as you now, it really doesnt help for me either we were told to sacrifice so much so thay we could allow this to happen in some form and now it has been so cruelly snatched away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

A worrying number of Twitter comments seem to be calling for outdoors mask mandates. That is pushing things way too far...

Why? Spain have had this for months and been told they will have it throughout next year, those blaming the British government for causing this need to think about almost every other european country that has very similar restrictions in place. Are all those governments equally incompetent? How have they managed to come up with a similar strategy despite having differing levels of covid and different "strains"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gingerfish79 said:

Some videos circulating on Twitter showing London train stations completely rammed as selfish, irresponsible idiots try to get out before the morning. 

Just drove back from work and the traffic out of London is horrendous. Clearly people are going to their bubbles now rather than next week.

Who else will be in tier 4 for Christmas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gizmoman said:

Why? Spain have had this for months and been told they will have it throughout next year, those blaming the British government for causing this need to think about almost every other european country that has very similar restrictions in place. Are all those governments equally incompetent? How have they managed to come up with a similar strategy despite having differing levels of covid and different "strains"?

Outdoor mask mandates clearly do very little to control spread. Spain had awful numbers when it had the mandate and good numbers when it still had it. The masks outside didn’t control transmission.

 

Outdoor masks are a pointless invasion of freedom. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an absolute disaster for me. I don't even know how to begin to explain just how much this has messed up my plans and my head. There are people that I need to see. Like reslly need to see. I don't know what to do. 

 

And before I get shat on, I know how bad the situation is. But I have been given guidance and I've planned for that guidance. Damn. 

Edited by Freddyflintstonree
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

Outdoor mask mandates clearly do very little to control spread. Spain had awful numbers when it had the mandate and good numbers when it still had it. The masks outside didn’t control transmission.

 

Outdoor masks are a pointless invasion of freedom. 

So why do you think the Spanish government have mandated them for the next 12 months? Are they stupid or do they have another reason other than disease suppression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...