Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Homer said:

Surely EVERYONE knows The Strokes' first album?

For reasons that I now can't quite remember (although, I suspect it's because at the time I was an obnoxious 16/17 year old metaller), I have it in my head that I hate The Strokes. I know the name of the album and that stupid/iconic album cover which was literally everywhere for years, obviously, but couldn't name any of their tunes....

Mentioned this to my Glastonbury chum the other day, who said "what, not even "Last Night"?". 

"Oh yeh, I really like that song!" Probably always did on the sly as well tbh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the people who think The Strokes only have one song (Last Nite), there's a few you might recognise from films, TV shows and ads (or any indie club night since 2001). They're one of those bands that seem to be used a lot. Try Someday and Reptilia first - strong chance you'll recognise them within seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldnt mind catching the Strokes is they played... but they are very much not Glasto pyramid headliners. Glasto has already used up its "questionable headliner" by booking Stormzy... booking the Strokes as well is pushing it. Unless they broke as fuck and saving money to pay mega acts next year? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Homer said:

Surely EVERYONE knows The Strokes' first album?

A turn of the century coffee table favourite along with Play by Moby, Come Away With Me by Norah Jones, On How Life Is by Macy Gray, All That You Can't Leave Behind by U2, White Ladder by David Gray and Life For Rent by Dido. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, clarkete said:

This thread is like an old and well loved piece of vinyl.  Every now and then it gets stuck in a groove and plays the same section again.

Or like the Brexit debate where everyone keeps repeating their entrenched views but no one is changing opionion because no one is listening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still got an inkling that it’s Gaga for the final headliner. Big marquee name. Female presence at the top of the lineup. Gap in her schedule. Bradley Cooper says he’s playing a secret set/is there every year anyway - guaranteed crowd going ape when he comes out for Shallow/other Star is Born songs. And I just have a feeling...

Gambino to sub. Noel on Other.

Where that leaves The Strokes amongst our ever increasing number of upper tier acts I don’t know. On before The Cure as a special guest? Or dare I say it, co-headliner, if you will. I don’t know. Just not straight up headlining the Saturday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Nal said:

A turn of the century coffee table favourite along with Play by Moby, Come Away With Me by Norah Jones, On How Life Is by Macy Gray, All That You Can't Leave Behind by U2, White Ladder by David Gray and Life For Rent by Dido. 

White Ladder... that was a good album. He is still doing the rounds isnt he? ha 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, yosoyyoberdi said:

If The Strokes are to headline, which I still doubt, they won't be getting the quietest crowd for sure. That will be a competition between The Cure and especially Stormzy. 

I think The Cure will end up with the smallest crowd (depending on the 3rd headliner), they cant even sell out their own shows. People are underestimating how popular Stormzy is. He got a big crowd on the Other in 17 and that was before his Brits success etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically I know The Strokes because they've been on the wishlists of people on multiple music forums for several years now. When I looked them up last summer I realised I knew about three songs of them. With all the talk about them, I listened to This Is It in full for the first time (and the other albums), I think, a couple of weeks ago. Enjoyable, but don't immediately feel the urge to frequently listen to them, especially with loads of exciting new music.

Compared to other headliners of say, the last 5-10 years, I was always more consciously aware of them. But then I might be more familiar with Arcade Fire than the average person. Stormzy was already a stretch, but has maybe more to do with the genre. So my biggest 'concern' is The Strokes in between Stormzy and The Cure. The Strokes appears to me as a Other Stage headliner at best, or may be bumped up to Pyramid next to two huge names. Their main appeal right now seems the relative scarcity of gigs in recent years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, StupidDream said:

Their main appeal right now seems the relative scarcity of gigs in recent years?

Yeah. Their main appeal was that they dressed all cool and were from New York. If they were from Barnsley no one would've given a shit. 

2 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

They were bleak times.

Ooh ooh and the Eminem one with Stan on it when people thought they were cool hip hop fans because they knew the words to the shouty bit at the end. 

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Nal said:

Yeah. Their main appeal was that they dressed all cool and were from New York. If they were from Barnsley no one would've given a shit. 

Ooh ooh and the Eminem one with Stan on it when people thought they were cool hip hop fans because they knew the words to the shouty bit at the end. 

When you look at all the shit that was out there at the turn of the millennium - Dido, Toploader, nu-Metal, David Grey, Starsailor... it's no wonder The Strokes became so popular. There was literally fuck all else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JoBalls said:

But the difference is that Kasabian have quite a lot of big tunes. The Strokes would have to play Last Nite on repeat for two hours... ?

Staggering opinion that, possibly the most bizarre I've seen on here since The Strokes rumour kicked off

It's one thing not to like them but to claim they have one single, that's laughable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Homer said:

If people want to wilfully ignore this kind of stuff then it's their loss I guess!
 

 

I have long maintained on these pages that Juicebox is an absolute banger and their best effort by a mile. I like The Strokes, always have done, I just don't think they should be headlining Glastonbury in 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I'd say it's mostly within a limited age group.

The age group thing is a fair point. I think one of the reasons I love them so much is when I first started going out properly to bars and more importantly 'indie clubs', a handful of their tunes were played every night guaranteed. 12:51, Reptilia, Juicebox but to a name a few, it was part of that era. They're songs that will stay with me forever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

I have long maintained on these pages that Juicebox is an absolute banger and their best effort by a mile. I like The Strokes, always have done, I just don't think they should be headlining Glastonbury in 2019.

That's fair enough - I'm just not convinced that they're total shit. If they do headline, I'll def go see them though (prob need to get a ticket first).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...