Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Gorillaz


gmb1992

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Zacko said:

Can somebody remind me, were Gorillaz originally meant to sub that year? Or were they not playing at all and drafted in?

Honestly can't remember. 

Weren't playing at all, had a month to get their shit together. I think by that point they'd announced their winter arena tour so were probably starting to rehearse for that to get it ready but its kind of fair their show was about half baked. The album came out in March beforehand but them only being on the line-up for a month was a big factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass said:

Had U2 played as they were supposed to in 2010 would Gorillaz have gotten the call in 2011?

Really interesting question that. 

Just looking at other 2011 headliners, I wonder if we would have got Arctics or the Foos instead? Both headlined T in the Park that year. 

That would then mean 2013 wouldn't have had Arctics, and so on and so forth...we're through the looking glass here people!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zacko said:

Really interesting question that. 

Just looking at other 2011 headliners, I wonder if we would have got Arctics or the Foos instead? Both headlined T in the Park that year. 

That would then mean 2013 wouldn't have had Arctics, and so on and so forth...we're through the looking glass here people!  

Arctics played in 2007 so I doubt they’d have been back so soon. Foos maybe, the fest were after them for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, grilladelphia said:

went up late to see them at Boomtown and it was the most rammo ive ever seen the Lions Den stage, so much so I sacked it off.. slight regret there

Aye, it was rammed and I think the atmosphere really helped - a lot of people up for a massive party!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, grilladelphia said:

went up late to see them at Boomtown and it was the most rammo ive ever seen the Lions Den stage, so much so I sacked it off.. slight regret there

I did the opposite, I was right in the mix (see pic) for the set but needed the toilet 40 odd minutes in. I went and then couldn't be bothered with the hassle of getting back to where I was so caught the end of Enter Shikari. 

 

IMG_20180811_211937649.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prior to 2010 Gorillaz had performed a literal handful of live dates.  Working out how to "do" the band live, during headline sets at Coachella and Glastonbury, seems crazy in hindsight.

There's a deliberate decision with their setlists to withhold the biggest songs til towards the end (based on Talking Heads' approach to Stop Making Sense, apparently) .  You have to obviously be very good for this approach to pay off.  You can't really afford too many filler tracks, and you need to get any guests on and off stage as efficiently as possible.  As mentioned, they are now a live juggernaut with a fantastic band, but it took almost a decade to get it right.  It's a complex band I can't see them at Glastonbury except as part of a major tour planned a long time in advance.  Could be several years away.  And they won't get to headline the Pyramid again.

I would agree that Demon Days and Plastic Beach are the two best albums.  I would also add that, given the "virtual band" angle, I think the "production" of the live show is arguably a bit uninspired (a big huge screen), and lags behind the likes of U2.

Edited by Johndenis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hugh Jass said:

Had U2 played as they were supposed to in 2010 would Gorillaz have gotten the call in 2011?

Nah. At the time I remember thinking it was good timing for Damon as they’d have otherwise never got the call (to headline the Pyramid, anyway). Kind of in that little bit too small to headline/too big to sub position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vintagelaureate said:

I did the opposite, I was right in the mix (see pic) for the set but needed the toilet 40 odd minutes in. I went and then couldn't be bothered with the hassle of getting back to where I was so caught the end of Enter Shikari. 

 

IMG_20180811_211937649.jpg

yeah don't blame you! I did the same and went to see Shikari for some nostalgia vibes, they were pretty good as I remember but I was hammered by that point so who knows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gorillaz at Glastonbury was an odd one. In its own way brilliant and also a failure. Lots of reasons behind it obviously. 

Seem them since, most recently at Rock Werchter where they nailed it. Give them an Orher Stage gig and they’ll nail it with a partisan crowd. Albarn deserves The redemption. 

Edited by strummer77
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strummer77 said:

Gorillaz at Glastonbury was an odd one. In its own way brilliant and also a failure. Lots of reasons behind it obviously. 

Seem them since, most recently at Rock Werchter where they nailed it. Give them an Orher Stage gig and they’ll nail it with a partisan crowd. Albarn deserves The redemption. 

He was in great form with TGTB&TQ last year...I missed Gorillaz when they played the pyramid though. Was up at the park for Broken Bells and on my way to the pyramid to meet my mates when they texted to say they had all left and gone to see the Bootleg Beatles! Would happily see them on the Other over some of the suggested headliners though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gorrilaz at the time of Clint Eastwood were excellent, loved em, by the time they stood in to headline Glastonbury, they were a completely different band with the same name, pretentious, up themselves, incoherent wailing with a parade of guest slots to supposedly keep the audience interested. I left after Bobby Womack did a pointless appearance and tried to catch what was left of Groove Armada

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

The Song Machine stuff is turning out rather well isn't it?  Easily the best work since Plastic Beach.  The recent Blur quote has had a lot of discussion, but the interview it comes from is mainly talking about Gorillaz. Looks like he's going to keep going with song machine, so it's really anyone's guess which of his big projects will be up and running when live music finally gets going again.

https://www.musicweek.com/talent/read/damon-albarn-talks-gorillaz-the-future-of-the-music-biz-and-blur/081142

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

The Song Machine stuff is turning out rather well isn't it?  Easily the best work since Plastic Beach.  The recent Blur quote has had a lot of discussion, but the interview it comes from is mainly talking about Gorillaz. Looks like he's going to keep going with song machine, so it's really anyone's guess which of his big projects will be up and running when live music finally gets going again.

https://www.musicweek.com/talent/read/damon-albarn-talks-gorillaz-the-future-of-the-music-biz-and-blur/081142

Really good. It seems like they’ve found their mojo again and the focus seems really refined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think as a project Gorillaz really works best operating on the fringe. By the time Humanz came out it was so hyped it seemed like he didn't know where to go with it with all the expectations. Similarly the Glastonbury set suffered a bit because of the expectations on Albarn and him reacting to his set the year before (among other things).

They've been back for a while now, found a groove to work in again, the live shows on YouTube look really great, looking forward to hearing the rest of this Song Machine stuff. I love em but struggled to keep the enthusiasm throughout the entirety of Humanz and The Now Now only really gets plays coz someone bought it me as a gift and I like throwing it on in the summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...