Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

what is that statement based on exactly?

The fact that Neil refrains that Glastonbury doesn't offer as much for their headliners as (lets say) reading and leeds would?

I can't see any of that trio being pissed at the fee, therefore Glastonbury wouldn't have to shell out a greater portion of money for one act, meaning that they have more money to spend on acts that aren't headliners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

i'm assuming Coldplay and Flo's love of the festival. don';t see why Grohl would take a lower fee

Yeh why would flo take a lower fee? Coldplay only made that offer due to having extreme wealth thanks to being the Biggest Band In The World.

Flo is nothing like in their position (although admittedly her massively posh and wealthy family probably have a higher net worth than coldplay)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that Neil refrains that Glastonbury doesn't offer as much for their headliners as (lets say) reading and leeds would?

I can't see any of that trio being pissed at the fee, therefore Glastonbury wouldn't have to shell out a greater portion of money for one act, meaning that they have more money to spend on acts that aren't headliners.

Make anote of the day and time - I agree with this other Matt!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that Neil refrains that Glastonbury doesn't offer as much for their headliners as (lets say) reading and leeds would?

I can't see any of that trio being pissed at the fee, therefore Glastonbury wouldn't have to shell out a greater portion of money for one act, meaning that they have more money to spend on acts that aren't headliners.

so you mean they will be offered the same amount of money as any other headliners ever are (the stones excepted), meaning the undercard will in fact be exactly the same as any other year.

I see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh why would flo take a lower fee?

I can imagine flo being more of an act that's desperate to say she's headlining glastonbury.

I don't think she's big enough, or has enough autonomy to only chase the big paycheques... I can't see her ever turning down the offer to headline glastonbury... ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so you mean they will be offered the same amount of money as any other headliners ever are (the stones excepted), meaning the undercard will in fact be exactly the same as any other year.

I see.

It's conjecture but I doubt the stones are the only headliner that glastonbury has shelled out for, too many acts have headlined glastonbury that would probably want a bit more than the standard fee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one else raised an eyebrow at the NME caning their article about why she should headline? Worthy HQ buttering people up.

I'd like to think Worthy HQ would be rather embarrassed if they asked the NME to put that out there!

It's only a matter of time before the likes of george michael are yearned for.

They did that last year didn't they? When Neil had Wham as a rumour!

It's conjecture but I doubt the stones are the only headliner that glastonbury has shelled out for, too many acts have headlined glastonbury that would probably want a bit more than the standard fee.

Except the only real fact we have around what the Stones were payed is that Michael said they got the same fee as every other headliner gets at Glastonbury?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't offer as much. So it would be the same whoever headlines. That's the point.

Coldplay once reportedly did it for free. Thats an exception

well no, it wouldn't, because it's not a standard headliner fee.

fees will be negotiated and bands will have their own standard fee, and that will budge based on a variety of factors.

in some cases Glastonbury will be able to match that relatively easily, or in other cases may have to work to a compromise.

as such there are probably plenty of headline level acts who were approached/had talks but subsequently didn't play.

if it was just "here's the headliner fee", then booking headliners would be a piece of piss.

Edited by ghostdancer1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Ah, that is interesting and ruins my theory a bit!!   I think my point just about holds though, and coming full circle on this discussion, being a sizable band such as Muse and not being able to sell out two O2 dates very quickly or at all doesn’t fill me with confidence that they be able to do a decent job selling a stadium tour…although maybe if Muse do something about their pricing, maybe they can!
    • I’ve said it elsewhere too but Emily Eavis said a 2028 headliner was booked, to me that’s only going to be someone the size of Oasis or Taylor Swift
    • Christ didn't even see that! 
    • It does feel very bland. It would certainly spell another year (my third, I think) away from Pyramid headliners for me. That doesn't mean they aren't worthy, though. I don't follow what any of them are up to, as it isn't my thing. Good luck to them.   You would think coming off a fallow year, they would want one big hitter. 'Big hitter' is obviously open to debate, but that was/is Madonna. Let's have it right. The eggs have gone in that basket, and it seems (as far the rumours go) that it's blown up. So now you're left with another plan B/replacement headliner.   I'm still of the opinion that Oasis will do it, before the Oasis thing is all said and done. Probably 2028, if they can come to an agreement. It may transpire that 2027 is bland (or at least to some of us), and 2028 is a bit... wild.   Again, though, none of us categorically know ANY of the headliners, as it stands.
    • Second go.....    Still f**king fantastic - Well done WIlliam Orbit -  Bugman & Trimm Trabb mega tracks - No Distance Left To Run hauntingly Beautiful  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...