Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Euphoricape said:

That was me getting optimistic for 3 big electronic headliners. I didn't mean to post it as fact, I has assumed it was already heavily rumoured.

 

Fri- Underworld

Sat- Basement Jaxx

Sun- The Prodigy

 

That would likely be the first year I’d not seen a pyramid headliner if true 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jamm said:

Likewise with Muse, just a gut feeling, even as a Muse fan. They haven’t really done anything of note since the last appearance and even then there was a load of murmurs about it being a boring booking. Can see them returning if they don’t fall off as they’re still Stadium/Arena sized (within reason) but don’t see it next year, maybe they do R&L or maybe they just have a quiet one. But as @charlierc said that last headline was 2016, doesn’t feel that long ago at all!

Maybe the fact TV isn't that much more HD 8/9 years on and that 2020/21 being a musical (supermassive) black hole thanks to covid helps make it feel like it was sooner than it was.

 

Simulation Theory and Will of the People have a couple of alright songs - and ones that work well live - but they're already imo at the "new LP cuts and singles" stage where the new LP stuff is in one tour, out the next.

 

I'm not convinced by them for Glastonbury, and certainly don't feel like this thread necessarily has had a constant stream of people saying they'll do it. Even though the trail on what Muse are doing has gone quiet since announcing those 3 shows, it's a question of where they might wash up here. BST Hyde Park still has 2/3 gigs to fill from what I recall, hence pondering if that might be a place. Someone also suggested them for that new Come Together thing up in Newcastle, though that could just be wishful thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CantWaitForGlasto22 said:

My ideal of those being discussed would be Pulp/Lady Gaga/Sam Fender. Suspect I will be 0/3 on those, but nice to dream… 

Feel like Fender is gonna prioritise his stadium stuff tbh.

 

Is the buzz that Gaga isn't around next year?

 

Pulp are touring given Bilbao BBK and Tramlines announced them but no idea what else they might do. I like the idea of them doing a Different Class in full tour - best album of the 90s imo. But it's tricky to know what else they're up to yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Maybe the fact TV isn't that much more HD 8/9 years on and that 2020/21 being a musical (supermassive) black hole thanks to covid helps make it feel like it was sooner than it was.

 

Simulation Theory and Will of the People have a couple of alright songs - and ones that work well live - but they're already imo at the "new LP cuts and singles" stage where the new LP stuff is in one tour, out the next.

 

I'm not convinced by them for Glastonbury, and certainly don't feel like this thread necessarily has had a constant stream of people saying they'll do it. Even though the trail on what Muse are doing has gone quiet since announcing those 3 shows, it's a question of where they might wash up here. BST Hyde Park still has 2/3 gigs to fill from what I recall, hence pondering if that might be a place. Someone also suggested them for that new Come Together thing up in Newcastle, though that could just be wishful thinking.

Simulation Theory and Will of the People had their detractors but agreed there’s a handful of good tracks across them. Even went to the Simulation Theory tour and had a blast. Dates didn’t work out on WOTP for me though.

 

Do they necessarily have to do any UK dates next year though? They could just do a few fleeting dates across the summer in Europe and that be it. They did R&L 2017, but they’re a bit more limited in headliner choice and it could get me there on a day ticket. Mind you R&L day tickets are extortionate these days.

 

Also looks like I misjudged that Come Together thing! I thought it was a standard 3-day event, but looks like they’re trying to do a Northern BST type deal focused on individual days on a site. Robbie Williams and KoL aren’t for me, but at least shows some ambition for the size of act they’re getting. One to watch for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Someoni said:

So does this have any bearing on  things do we think?

Reading25-Portrait-Web-900x1125.jpg

In a word: No.

 

Chappell not being exclusive maybe? Wasn’t there talk that’s what they were trying for. Increased chance of her at Glastonbury I guess.

 

Other than that maybe Amyl, and a couple mid or down bill acts like Kooks cropping up somewhere but in the whole don’t think there’d be much overlap.

 

If Glastonbury was to get a heavier act on the Other stage give me Deftones over BMTH any day of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jamm said:

In a word: No.

 

Chappell not being exclusive maybe? Wasn’t there talk that’s what they were trying for. Increased chance of her at Glastonbury I guess.

 

Other than that maybe Amyl, and a couple mid or down bill acts like Kooks cropping up somewhere but in the whole don’t think there’d be much overlap.

 

If Glastonbury was to get a heavier act on the Other stage give me Deftones over BMTH any day of the week.

Bmth is someone I've not seen yet. Thr drummer is phenomenal 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

They never share headliners in the same year but some Reading headliners have appeared lower down the Glastonbury bill.

 

Indeed, especially since R+L started pretending that they had 2 headliners per day.

 

Lewis Capaldi was one example, quite recently, although I think he ended up pulling out of R+L

Edited by incident
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, incident said:

 

Indeed, especially since R+L started pretending that they had 2 headliners per day.

 

Lewis Capaldi was one example, quite recently, although I think he ended up pulling out of R+L

Yeah that was when Lewis was a second stage head before The Killers during the dual main stage experiment that has since been canned.

 

Looks too like they've canned the 6 headliners idea. Hozier & Chappell Roan appear to be co-heads but BMTH & Travis Scott seem to be standalone bill-toppers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Jamm said:

Do they necessarily have to do any UK dates next year though? They could just do a few fleeting dates across the summer in Europe and that be it. They did R&L 2017, but they’re a bit more limited in headliner choice and it could get me there on a day ticket. Mind you R&L day tickets are extortionate these days.

Well it's a moot point now given the Reading and Leeds line-up is out with no Muse on it.

 

I am aware that the possibility is there - the 2024 tour schedule is literally just two Middle East concerts. But feels like in theory at least the machine would be more active than just the 3 European shows announced so far (although a Brazil date was being rumoured on their Reddit) and if they are going to be in the area, why not throw in a show in the UK?

 

Guess we'll find out though. Like you say, not an obligation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sorcha17 said:

"Chappell Roan will be making the victory lap off the back of the phenomenal slowburn success of her debut album ‘The Rise And Fall Of A Midwest Princess‘, appearing at R&L as an English headline exclusive."

From the NME article - very odd wording there on the exclusivity.

So we think that potentially means a show in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland in the week before R&L?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, charlierc said:

So we think that potentially means a show in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland in the week before R&L?

I think it means playing another english festival but not headlining (glasto)

 

People might cry for me mentioning rumours from the discord again but been said for a couple weeks there that she is subing O Rod on the sunday. This is now way more likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...