Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Quark said:

Always seemed to be in a minority on this, but I loved Outlaw Pete

Fair enough. But if we’re taking about Bruce’s epics, I do hate Outlaw Pete, but probably more because of what it’s not; Jungleland, Backstreets, incident, NYC serenade, Rosalita or Racing in the Street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

The deep cuts and Bon Iver covers Kanye played were by a distance the worst received parts of the set. Ultimately hits are what the crowd comes for so it makes sense to just get on with playing them. 

Yep, take out the 15minute Bon Iver cryfest and the Kanye set was pure bangers

 

Stronger
Power
Niggas in Paris(JAY Z & Kanye West cover)
Black Skinhead(Aborted and re-started due to stage invader)
All Day(Kanye West feat. Theophilus London, Allan Kingdom & Paul McCartney cover)
Cold as Ice(Foreigner song)
Cold(Kanye West feat. DJ Khaled cover)
Clique(Kanye West, Jay-Z & Big Sean cover)
I Don't Like(Chief Keef cover) (Remix)
Mercy(Kanye West feat. Big Sean, Pusha T & 2 Chainz cover)
New Slaves
Blood on the Leaves
Heartless(verse 2 and 3 were performed)
I Wonder(first time since 2013)
FourFiveSeconds(Rihanna and Kanye West and Paul McCartney cover) (Kanye solo live debut)
Woods(Bon Iver cover)
Lost in the World(with Justin Vernon) (Extended version. 1st time… more )
Hold My Liquor(with Justin Vernon) (first time that he performed… more )

No Church in the Wild(JAY Z & Kanye West cover) (Kanye solo live debut)
Jesus Walks
Diamonds From Sierra Leone
Bound 2
Runaway
Only One(Kanye West featuring Paul McCartney cover)
Touch the Sky(Aborted and re-started)
All of the Lights
Good Life
Bohemian Rhapsody(Queen song) (Kanye / crowd singalong until… more )
Can't Tell Me Nothing


Encore:
Gold Digger
All Falls Down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Exactly - people talk about headline sets as if they will be something more than that. It will be what the artist does 90% of the time. Their current show with a few more hits thrown in.

Doing something special for glastonbury is a bit of a nothing point. I don’t know what people mean. You compare their usual sets to their glastonbury set and it’s pretty much the same set aside from maybe one or two more hits than usual.

Monkeys got out strings last time they played and are meant to be again this time, they only do it for glasto. That’s the sort of thing people mean

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, AnonAnon said:

Yeah, namely Billie and Stormzy had about an hour of recorded material between them and, as big as they are, and I do think Billie in particular is legitimately an incredibly talented singer and writer in her genre, it just felt 'too soon'.  

Both Kendrick and Billie's sets felt 'short' last year, with weak spots because a larger % of the set is taken up with 'album filler' or 'deep cuts' than knock out tracks.  

That's no sleight on them, I have  records by each of them, it's just a tall ask.  There are very few artists in history who could fill what is traditionally a two/three hour slot with their first two albums of material.  Bob Dylan would've done an hour of niche folk covers and then admittedly pretty decent hour of his early songs, as an example.

It's why I sort of believe you need at least 5 maybe even 6 albums to headline the pyramid.  At least that way you're guaranteed between 10-20  A grade songs per set. 

So then you wouldve not had Arctic Monkeys, Coldplay, Radiohead, Billie, Stormzy, Arcade Fire, Travis, Ed Sheeran , Adele and a lot of others headline  when they did because you thought they needed to keep proving they were "worthy" cause you have to have a lot of songs. Yeah ok, so you wouldve had a really small pool of artists to even try and book if thats your rule. You also wouldve had lots of acts end up headlining not in their prime cause of this thinking.  So yeah, Guns N Roses and Elton pretty much are the right acts you could have headline this year cause there was nobody else available via your criteria. So Dua or Sam Fender will have to wait til theyre in their 30's to headline even though theyre on the path. 
 

At minimum its 3 albums. Or going into album 3. Obviously exceptions happen and theyre rare anyway. Harry Styles apparently wont qualify for a while even though he will keep on selling out stadiums with just the 3 releases he even has. 

Edited by Suprefan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always like it when headliners do ‘something’ to mark the occasion. Off the top of my head from the years I’ve been going:

Jay Z - Oasis cover walk on

Muse - had the Edge join them

U2 - had a video link from space 

Coldplay (2011) - turned the pyramid different colours

Arctics - used strings 

Stones - reworked Factory Girl into Glastonbury Girl. Also played 2,000 Light Years for the first time in years in a nod to the arctics

Mumfords - invited a load of guests for a big singalong 

Kanye - had the crane 

Coldplay (2016) - had the bracelets, although I think they used these in their tour too

Radiohead - hits setlist

Stormzy - special guests and the ballet dancers

Killers - special guests

The Cure - hits setlist (although that might be common, I’m not sure)

McCartney - special guests

Kendrick - unique setlist and show 

 

Any I missed?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mike46 said:

I always like it when headliners do ‘something’ to mark the occasion. Off the top of my head from the years I’ve been going:

Jay Z - Oasis cover walk on

Muse - had the Edge join them

U2 - had a video link from space 

Coldplay (2011) - turned the pyramid different colours

Arctics - used strings 

Stones - reworked Factory Girl into Glastonbury Girl. Also played 2,000 Light Years for the first time in years in a nod to the arctics

Mumfords - invited a load of guests for a big singalong 

Kanye - had the crane 

Coldplay (2016) - had the bracelets, although I think they used these in their tour too

Radiohead - hits setlist

Stormzy - special guests and the ballet dancers

Killers - special guests

The Cure - hits setlist (although that might be common, I’m not sure)

McCartney - special guests

Kendrick - unique setlist and show 

 

Any I missed?

 

 

Arctic monkeys in 2007 covering  ‘diamonds are forever’ in a nod to Shirley basseys legends slot and also bringing out dizzee rascal for ‘temptation greets you like a naughty friend’

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mike46 said:

I always like it when headliners do ‘something’ to mark the occasion. Off the top of my head from the years I’ve been going:

Jay Z - Oasis cover walk on

Muse - had the Edge join them

U2 - had a video link from space 

Coldplay (2011) - turned the pyramid different colours

Arctics - used strings 

Stones - reworked Factory Girl into Glastonbury Girl. Also played 2,000 Light Years for the first time in years in a nod to the arctics

Mumfords - invited a load of guests for a big singalong 

Kanye - had the crane 

Coldplay (2016) - had the bracelets, although I think they used these in their tour too

Radiohead - hits setlist

Stormzy - special guests and the ballet dancers

Killers - special guests

The Cure - hits setlist (although that might be common, I’m not sure)

McCartney - special guests

Kendrick - unique setlist and show 

 

Any I missed?

 

 

Good list, but re: Kanye, I’m not a huge fan so maybe someone who is can confirm, but it was a cherry picker he had and I’m pretty sure on his tour he got on top of his light rig which wasn’t possible at Glasto, so this was just to try and replicate that, so nothing special to Glasto as such.

Edit: Yeah:

EC74E634-3470-436D-BFB0-652DABD31935.webp

Edited by Jose Pose
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jose Pose said:

Good list, but re: Kanye, I’m not a huge fan so maybe someone who is can confirm, but it was a cherry picker he had and I’m pretty sure on his tour he got on top of his light rig which wasn’t possible at Glasto, so this was just to try and replicate that, so nothing special to Glasto as such.

Edit: Yeah:

EC74E634-3470-436D-BFB0-652DABD31935.webp

Ah fair enough! I’m not au fait with a lot of these headliners outside of the festival so might be a few tenuous ones on that list that are actually pretty standard for their shows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Exactly - people talk about headline sets as if they will be something more than that. It will be what the artist does 90% of the time. Their current show with a few more hits thrown in.

Doing something special for glastonbury is a bit of a nothing point. I don’t know what people mean. You compare their usual sets to their glastonbury set and it’s pretty much the same set aside from maybe one or two more hits than usual.

Kendrick’s set was unique to Glastonbury (yes, there was an Italy gig that was a practice run).

I was there and was also at his O2 gig, which was a huge production with props, effects, catwalk staging, a massive glass box… none of that would fit on the Pyramid stage.

It was obvious to anyone watching that night the amount of thought and craft that had gone into that show. The staging, the lighting, the set list, the costumes, the choreography, the crown… it was all designed to get the best out of the space they had.

That’s why it was special to Glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, mike46 said:

I always like it when headliners do ‘something’ to mark the occasion. Off the top of my head from the years I’ve been going:

Jay Z - Oasis cover walk on

Muse - had the Edge join them

U2 - had a video link from space 

Coldplay (2011) - turned the pyramid different colours

Arctics - used strings 

Stones - reworked Factory Girl into Glastonbury Girl. Also played 2,000 Light Years for the first time in years in a nod to the arctics

Mumfords - invited a load of guests for a big singalong 

Kanye - had the crane 

Coldplay (2016) - had the bracelets, although I think they used these in their tour too

Radiohead - hits setlist

Stormzy - special guests and the ballet dancers

Killers - special guests

The Cure - hits setlist (although that might be common, I’m not sure)

McCartney - special guests

Kendrick - unique setlist and show 

 

Any I missed?

 

 

Coldplay did a few things in 2016. They got Barry Gibb and Michael Eavis on to sing and also covered Viola Beach. 

Florence covered Times Like These by Foo Fighters in 2015.

Arcade Fire did a thing on that tour where their bobbleheads came on stage and before the encore and music played. For Glastonbury they had Wonderwall, 99 Problems, Common People and a few others since it was Glastonbury. 

They’d done this a couple of times before but Kasabian brought Noel Fielding or Vlad the Impaler. They also covered Crazy by Gnarls Barkley for some reason, which I think was their first time doing it live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kingcrawler said:

Coldplay did a few things in 2016. They got Barry Gibb and Michael Eavis on to sing and also covered Viola Beach. 

Florence covered Times Like These by Foo Fighters in 2015.

Arcade Fire did a thing on that tour where their bobbleheads came on stage and before the encore and music played. For Glastonbury they had Wonderwall, 99 Problems, Common People and a few others since it was Glastonbury. 

They’d done this a couple of times before but Kasabian brought Noel Fielding or Vlad the Impaler. They also covered Crazy by Gnarls Barkley for some reason, which I think was their first time doing it live.

Great additions! Completely forgot about that Viola Beach cover, that was beautiful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Doing “something special” isn’t just about wheeling some guests out.

As I said about Kendrick, he wrote and prepared a show specifically for that stage.

Agree to an extent, but then compare Miley's Primavera set to her Glastonbury one:

Screenshot_20230122_102320_Chrome.thumb.jpg.e385884d6a81fb2e5eddffbd2c2418d6.jpgScreenshot_20230122_102412_Chrome.thumb.jpg.54daf3bc14f21a1c071a7126e1e5fe42.jpgScreenshot_20230122_102420_Chrome.thumb.jpg.1cf69b95deac6cecbc9d6fa06626ab76.jpg

She clearly changed everything up for Glastonbury, went full on rock and shipped over Lil Nas X and her old man for her 3rd down slot. She knew the significance and did something special for it. It'd be more surprising these days if a headliner didn't bring out a guest or two.

Edited by kingbadger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Suprefan said:

At minimum its 3 albums. Or going into album 3. Obviously exceptions happen and theyre rare anyway. Harry Styles apparently wont qualify for a while even though he will keep on selling out stadiums with just the 3 releases he even has. 

Tbf I think the challenge with getting Styles on that stage isn't so much that and more that he seems to just always be elsewhere that weekend. Maybe 2024 they'll get lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mike46 said:

U2 - had a video link from space 

I think that was a regular bit on the U2 360 Tour in 2011 giving that Bono knew the astronaut in question. Though it's also fair to note that the tour they had at that time would've been impractical to bring to Glastonbury given both that it used a fucking massive stage designed for stadiums and that all the apparatus for it was in the USA as Glasto was plonked in-between 2 US stadium shows.

I think the setlist idea was right - started with 5 Achtung Baby songs with Zoo TV style imagery, then Joshua Tree Tour opening, 2000's hits, Live Aid set and then a few odds & sods at the end. What they got wrong imo was thinking they could just fly in from a US show on a Wednesday night, do Glasto on the Friday, then back on a Sunday. Even if it was pissing it down, I doubt it was exactly fresh. That and looking back at it, they were out of sync with the backing track on the opening song, making it a bit of a messy start.

Someone said they think U2 could do another crack at this but that it would be funny if it was as rainy, which... fair. I think they themselves would be amused to come back only to get soggy again.

Edited by charlierc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...