Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Ayrshire Chris said:

Pre 2019 festival Emily was very committed to having 50% of female acts, she mentioned it several times in interviews. It would be surprising if one headliner isn’t female. Dua is an obvious choice but who knows what is planned. 

It’s 50% of acts over the festival though right? 

Dua or Taylor would have made this years trio pretty balanced, but if they’re not available then what can you do?

There’ll be plenty of females headlining other stages and in prominent slots. 

Edited by nikkic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nikkic said:

It’s 50% of acts over the festival though right? 

Dua or Taylor would have made this years trip pretty balanced, but if they’re not available then what can you do?

There’ll be plenty of females headlining other stages and in prominent slots. 

Exactly, and if you can have the likes of Lizzo, Lana Del Rey and Doja Cat in big prominent spots (sub or headline other) then it still looks female strong 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Hours of fun 

8CCCC959-5ED5-4FD2-80C4-35D21A918280.jpeg

09750ECA-9603-489E-81D6-950661F28327.jpeg

B665F5F7-24FA-4601-9132-596CC2465DE8.jpeg

E7C68E32-4080-45E2-BB02-35C95F008748.jpeg

Did we get the answer to this? Old Black Pain Show? Gawd knows, I’m tired.

I really like AM. Does that make me really un-cool? I also love Mardy Bum. Maybe it reminds me of an easier time, when I wasn’t really an adult with loads of responsibility, dunno 🤷🏼‍♀️. Anyway what I’m hearing is they’re an absolute snooze fest live and although I don’t mind the new albums I don’t want to listen to them live, prefer them for a chilled evening at home. So s0d them. Elton on el pointio is enough for 1 festival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

I don't think liking or disliking AM is cool or uncool. If you like em, great. Always find it weird when people say it's snobbish not to like a band. I've always thought they're shit but very happy to go watch something else.

I caveat my confession with the fact that there isn’t much out there that I don’t like aside from heavy metal or heavier rock type stuff. 

But you are right. We’re all cool here 😎 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, sisco said:

Exactly, and if you can have the likes of Lizzo, Lana Del Rey and Doja Cat in big prominent spots (sub or headline other) then it still looks female strong 

Truth.

I’d actually say it’s more of a statement to fill the undercard with exciting new female acts rather than give prominent slots to the likes of The Libertines.

The more that happens, the greater the pool for female headliners in years to come. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nikkic said:

It’s 50% of acts over the festival though right? 

Dua or Taylor would have made this years trio pretty balanced, but if they’re not available then what can you do?

There’ll be plenty of females headlining other stages and in prominent slots. 

Brace for the angry mob on social media

For a festival like glastonbury booking essentially 3 acts out of the 5 or so biggest touring that year, the female headliner pool is usually 1/2 people. Leaves them in a very tough spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nikkic said:

It’s 50% of acts over the festival though right? 

Dua or Taylor would have made this years trio pretty balanced, but if they’re not available then what can you do?

There’ll be plenty of females headlining other stages and in prominent slots. 

Yes that’s true, it’s just that the pyramid headliners are the acts that get the attention of the media, but let’s face it who gives a toss what they say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LivOctober said:

Florence and the Machine has a big gap in the tour schedule over the Glasto weekend...

Screenshot_20221203-114435.png

I'm of the mind she can't be completely ruled out due to the GSH but she's very unlikely. I know she wouldn't be too popular a choice here, but she's still big enough to do it (Dance Fever hit #1, pretty much sold out two nights at the o2) and is known for putting on great live shows, but I imagine there's a fair few on the list ahead of her.

If not 2023, I do think she'll headline again in the future though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LivOctober said:

Florence and the Machine has a big gap in the tour schedule over the Glasto weekend...

Screenshot_20221203-114435.png

she was also rumoured for 2021 and she doesn't seem to be doing any other UK festivals other than Boardmasters which was probably just bc of the canceled 2019 event. I think she's a bit small for the headline position but she'd put on an amazing show and is more likely than Dua (who has very publicly said that she's finished touring FN and plans to be in the studio for the next few months). Bey or Rih could still swoop in though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Acid_Haze said:

Beyonce saturday headliner??? She'd go down a storm and she has a UK summer stadium tour in the pipeline for next year.

I was thinking this earlier. AM/Queen B/Elton would be one for the ages. Slim chance I reckon but wow, if it happens, Amen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...