Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Because there have been no rumours whatsoever of her headlining Glastonbury 2023.

RHCP having never touched Glasto and playing a festival in Belgium a week before is as worthwhile to me as us already knowing a worldwide Beyonce tour is due to be announced, but fair enough. Mostly me hoping. Would take Rihanna though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BenG92 said:

RHCP having never touched Glasto and playing a festival in Belgium a week before is as worthwhile to me as us already knowing a worldwide Beyonce tour is due to be announced, but fair enough. Mostly me hoping. Would take Rihanna though. 

If a tour gets announced and there's a GSH she can go on to the possibilities list.

RHCP are there because they're a massive, headliner sized act who will be in Europe and free that weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might have missed a reason why she can't play but wonder if Dua Lipa can headline one night and Elton the other and they combine for their song on one of the nights? I guess it would make most sense for him to come on during her set as he'll have a hard enough job fitting all his songs into his own set let alone adding collabs (even if that collab is already a cover of his song).

AM - Elton - Dua Lipa is a great set of headliners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

If a tour gets announced and there's a GSH she can go on to the possibilities list.

RHCP are there because they're a massive, headliner sized act who will be in Europe and free that weekend.


They are, but the Eavis clan were still holding their 29 year long RHCP grudge strong as recently as 3 years ago, honestly I think Beyonce with no announced dates is still more likely than them at this point. But I guess that's something impossible to measure, they could change their mind overnight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DareToDibble said:

Might have missed a reason why she can't play but wonder if Dua Lipa can headline one night and Elton the other and they combine for their song on one of the nights? I guess it would make most sense for him to come on during her set as he'll have a hard enough job fitting all his songs into his own set let alone adding collabs (even if that collab is already a cover of his song).

AM - Elton - Dua Lipa is a great set of headliners.

No chance Reg is sticking around to do one song the next night… much more likely that Dua doesn’t headline and appears in his set to tee up her return I. 2024

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, GrumpyRaver said:

No chance Reg is sticking around to do one song the next night… much more likely that Dua doesn’t headline and appears in his set to tee up her return I. 2024

Fair point. Taken this long to get him to headline, seems unlikely he would then do 2 nights 😄 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, brettredmayne said:

Supporting pink, no where near a headliner

I'm inclined to agree. 15 years ago, totally could have but since she left the UK/leaned more into US media etc, she's fallen off the radar a bit in terms of mainstream. 

 

Also, she hasn't released a solo album since 2017 which was a Xmas album, 2016 for a studio album, and No Doubt's last album was 2012. She did release a couple of songs in 2020, but no album.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

She's no headliner if she's only a support at Hyde Park. 

This year's subs at Hyde Park included Stereophonics, Pixies, Nile Rogers and Plant & Krauss. Any of them headlining?

Not sure she's even a sub to be honest.

She's a legend though, isn't she?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

She's no headliner if she's only a support at Hyde Park. 

This year's subs at Hyde Park included Stereophonics, Pixies, Nile Rogers and Plant & Krauss. Any of them headlining?

Not sure she's even a sub to be honest.

Skippy has argued for this dangerous renegade a few times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 09matthewsw said:

And people think Blur are ruled out because they’re in Dublin the day before. 🤦‍♂️ 

No, people think Blur are ruled out as their Wembley date is being touted as their only UK appearance in 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...