Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Copperface said:

That's fair enough and your choice. You might be disadvantaged by that choice, but it's your choice to make. 

That in itself is a whole other argument. 

I just think we will see a decrease in the uptake as we look to roll it out to younger people - who are far less impacted if they catch Covid than other cohorts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

That in itself is a whole other argument. 

I just think we will see a decrease in the uptake as we look to roll it out to younger people - who are far less impacted if they catch Covid than other cohorts. 

Well then we won't get out of it and its the anti vaxxers fault.

I dont see any evidence of younger people being a lot more anti vaccine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

Its possible to be sceptical of the current vaccines and not be anti vaccines. 

I think it's a big disingenuous to discount the other worries people have about the vaccines due to there being no data around things impact in fertility etc... I'm not keen on the idea of a jab myself and I'm really not keen on my son having it he's 10 and got his whole life to live and Covid is of such a minute risk to him it almost doesn't feel worth it with such little information. He's had all his other injections which have stood the test of time. 

I'm not sure there's ever been a case of a vaccine impacting fertility though.  You're right that Covid is little risk to him and by the time that he's due to have the vaccine hopefully the majority of the population will have have already had it

Edited by Chawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Chawk said:

I'm not sure there's ever been a case of a vaccine impacting fertility though.  You're right that Covid is little risk to him and by the time that he's due to have the vaccine hopefully the majority of the population will have have already had it

This stuff is so new we don't have the first notion of any long term effects of it - it's simply not been around long enough to test the theory. 

With all these things now it's there I'm sure there will be hundreds of studies by academics all around the world into the various impact this vaccine and indeed the illness itself has on things like fertility and all manner of other things. 

I'm just not to keen on being the test pilot.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

This stuff is so new we don't have the first notion of any long term effects of it - it's simply not been around long enough to test the theory. 

With all these things now it's there I'm sure there will be hundreds of studies by academics all around the world into the various impact this vaccine and indeed the illness itself has on things like fertility and all manner of other things. 

I'm just not to keen on being the test pilot.

Why do you keep mentioning fertility?

I don't think anyone halfway credible is even contemplating that there might a link there, and I'm not convinced anyone worth listening to will even bother to study it unless as a response to or pre-emption of some Andrew Wakefield style bullshit / scaremongering . There was initially advice not to give the Pfizer jab to pregnant women, but that's because the scientists are if anything being over cautious not because there was any specific concern.

That's not to say there can't ever be a link - but given that the vaccines fundamentally work by simulating (a non infectious) part of the virus, it's extremely likely that if any issues are discovered down the line then the manifestation in the vaccine would be no worse than you could get from the virus itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Bunch of twats

 

2 things, what’s an A&E SHO?

And I wonder if cameras were allowed in the ICUs if that would help with this kind of thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

2 things, what’s an A&E SHO?

And I wonder if cameras were allowed in the ICUs if that would help with this kind of thing?

Job title.

And they have been at various points - doesn't seem to impact on thick people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, incident said:

Job title.

And they have been at various points - doesn't seem to impact on thick people.

I don’t think we’ve seen in ICUs like they did in Italy, have we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...