Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

So what happened to the Oxford medicine that was just ready to drop into vials ? We are way short on the quantaties reported ready to go aren’t we ? 

4 million in vials ready to go once the batches are approved. 15 millions ready to put in vials. And then probably more Pfizer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/31/2020 at 10:34 AM, zahidf said:

Some of the stuff can be used. But the keeping people locked up in apartments at gunpoint is basically the main way they did it, and cutting down on all reporting on the issues.

They’re essentially having the same rules we do, they are just enforcing them

 

On 12/31/2020 at 11:41 AM, efcfanwirral said:

 

Problem with this is the same reason it actually would have been worse under Labour - the country is pro "freedom" so any attempts to lock down before there is overwhelming evidence that you definitely need to is going into the realms of authoritarian. For the Tories and their supporters, who make up the majority of this country, there needs to be numbers to support it 

If it'd been Labour trying to lock down in anticipation of something happening then compliance would've been too low and it could've been seen by many as the communists enacting the plan of control that they wanted to do anyway. This country was always a lost cause for stopping this virus because of the public. 

The stupidity and selfishness of many of the people in this country is why we are where we are. The majority don't believe in government control or being told what to do in any way, so no government could've stopped this without hugely authoritarian measures. The deaths and cases was inevitable here - lockdown too early and nobody complies and lock down hard too often and you'd probably end up with civil unrest and less restrictions overall. And those are the only options - we won't even accept proper quarantine of travellers so I dont know what chance we have in every day life 

Labour would have offered people money to isolate and I would posit as a nation we like free stuff more than freedom!

 

20 hours ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

No worries. I think it's too simplistic to think the government (as a collective)  didn't see increases coming with things like the return to university they would have seen it and they would have felt they could mitigate the risk due to the ages of those getting infected not increasing the pressure on the hospitals. Due to the demographics involved. 

The rationale behind eat out to help out was make hay whilst the sun shines - we don't know how many businesses have survived this long because of that scheme at the time that decision was made we coped with any increase it brought about. When you judge the decisions in the context of the time they were made they haven't been disastrous in the grand scheme of things (unlike the nursing home decision). 

A friend of mine is convinced his business would have gone under without the tiers because it allowed him some time to open and make some money to make some bills. Now he is back under Tier 4 he is worried for his businesses future again. He will not be alone. 

Personally I think the biggest mistake they have made lately has been London and the South East avoiding T3 after the November lock down why this decision was made we'll probably never know and how much of this increase down there now is actually attributed to the new strain. The way people move around the capital cannot have helped - but as I've said hindsight is a wonderful thing. 

To all intents and purposes the country is in a November style lockdown we will see in the next few weeks if it's harsh enough or not.

Obviously there are a few areas that aren't the majority of which have been under T3 restrictions for a long time. Does this show that T3 is in fact the balancing point between the economy and controling the virus? Are the tiers about right and it's just how we are allocating the tiers that needs refining?

Decisions are made at a point in time based on the information and the situation at that point in time. They are then judged in the context of what we know now, not what we knew then. 

I think it’s fair to say the government are balancing a number of priorities, including keeping people safe and the economy. Unfortunately one of the priorities they are also balancing is “how can we help our rich mates get richer from this?”

That’s the major problem. They will get some things wrong but have left themselves no margin for error by throwing money at their mates to do fuck all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

So what happened to the Oxford medicine that was just ready to drop into vials ? We are way short on the quantaties reported ready to go aren’t we ? 

We’re short on the vials. AZ say they have 5 million doses ready to go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, crazyfool1 said:

Just seems like numbers are slipping maybe alcohol is still hitting me 

I think you’re right, looked into it and there are 4m doses ready but not enough glass vials, hopefully it’s something they can sort out as that would be mega frustrating if it’s what ends up holding it back!

The telegraph does say there are definitely now a million ready for Monday, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BobWillis said:

We’re short on the vials. AZ say they have 5 million doses ready to go. 

 

1 minute ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

I think you’re right, looked into it and there are 4m doses ready but not enough glass vials, hopefully it’s something they can sort out as that would be mega frustrating if it’s what ends up holding it back!

The telegraph does say there are definitely now a million ready for Monday, though.

Cheers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, crazyfool1 said:

Just seems like numbers are slipping maybe alcohol is still hitting me 

More like slipped! Huge numbers of doctors and nurses caring for covid patients still not been vaccinated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Gran is in her mid 90s and her care home said they aren’t getting any vaccine till February. They haven’t had a single case in their home so they reckon it’s because the government think they don’t need it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Sasperella said:

Hi Lycra! I always appreciate reading posts from you, Toilet Duck and others with a bit more inside knowledge 🙂

I keep hearing people say "reinfection is incredibly rare", but surely it would be at the start of a pandemic? It seems kind of obvious that as immunity wears off over time, we could start seeing people who were infected at the beginning becoming reinfected. There is going to be little evidenc yet, but we do know that people can be reinfected...so presumably over time the number of cases will increase?

What people really mean when they say reinfection is rare is that symptomatic reinfection is (so far) rare (we really don’t know how many people get reinfected but remain asymptomatic). Given the repeated exposures to large viral loads frontline healthcare staff face, I’d be surprised if they didn’t get reinfected. But, as @Lycra says, at that point, you hope our immune response kicks in and stops it before it progresses to disease (and so far, our immunological memory looks robust out to 8 months and growing). Even those that get vaccinated can still pick it up, but again, the protection from the vaccine is intended to prevent it getting a foothold (Which is exactly what we see in the trial data). Our immune response is complex, lots of things influence how well it works (including the time of day and the time of year, your general well being, sleep, alcohol consumption, loads of things). Frontline healthcare staff are flat out and probably looking after their patients better than they are looking after themselves, so if anyone is going to get a second bout of COVID, it’ll be them. They were asked to go into harms way with inadequate PPE at the start of this, now they are being asked to deal with it without vaccination (I know it is coming, but as quickly as possible would be better!). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Wayhey, the Brexit bonus!

Yeah, just a shame we've screwed over the women who are still in the EU. From the guardian:

...in 2016 – under pressure from the then prime minister, David Cameron, the European parliament had voted unanimously to start the regulatory process to allow any EU country to abolish any tampon tax.

“That process has since gone cold, because we then left the EU and we were the ones pushing for it,” said Coryton. “So if anything, actually, Brexit has made it worse, because if we were to have stayed in the EU, then this piece of legislation would have gone through… then any EU member would be able to axe the tax, not just the UK.”

And from the same article:

Since 2015 the £15m funds the tampon tax has raised in the UK have been directed to women’s refuges and domestic abuse charities. “The tampon tax has long been a symbol of policymaking based around men’s needs, so removing VAT is symbolically important,”’ said Mary-Ann Stephenson of the Women’s Budget Group. “But the tampon tax money has been an important source of funding for the women’s sector – the government needs to be clear about what will replace it.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

What people really mean when they say reinfection is rare is that symptomatic reinfection is (so far) rare (we really don’t know how many people get reinfected but remain asymptomatic). Given the repeated exposures to large viral loads frontline healthcare staff face, I’d be surprised if they didn’t get reinfected. But, as @Lycra says, at that point, you hope our immune response kicks in and stops it before it progresses to disease (and so far, our immunological memory looks robust out to 8 months and growing). Even those that get vaccinated can still pick it up, but again, the protection from the vaccine is intended to prevent it getting a foothold (Which is exactly what we see in the trial data). Our immune response is complex, lots of things influence how well it works (including the time of day and the time of year, your general well being, sleep, alcohol consumption, loads of things). Frontline healthcare staff are flat out and probably looking after their patients better than they are looking after themselves, so if anyone is going to get a second bout of COVID, it’ll be them. They were asked to go into harms way with inadequate PPE at the start of this, now they are being asked to deal with it without vaccination (I know it is coming, but as quickly as possible would be better!). 

Ah thank you - of course, 'symptomatic reinfection'! This makes more sense now 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

I think you’re right, looked into it and there are 4m doses ready but not enough glass vials, hopefully it’s something they can sort out as that would be mega frustrating if it’s what ends up holding it back!

The telegraph does say there are definitely now a million ready for Monday, though.

Glass vials shortages was flagged as a possible issue regarding the challenges should a vaccine be found months ago (I remember reade the article) - you'd hope they'd have plenty of forewarning about this and have taken steps, but then again... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...