Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, fraybentos1 said:

I thought it was 50k by Monday then could go as high as 100k after that ... I could be wrong.

As I say tho, Scotland is going down so no reason England won’t too 

 

1 hour ago, august1 said:

70,000 seemed to be the scenario based on the current rates a couple of weeks back, cases were going up slower so was always going to be too high

 

1 hour ago, BobWillis2 said:

Fairly sure I’ve seen it said cases would be 100k on/by the 19th

I read about Javid saying that cases could peak at 100k, didn't see the other stuff, so probably just missed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Uh oh... though it's unlikely IMO bojo will agree

No wonder people don't know what to believe - one minute its we need to learn to live with the virus, the next its saying we need to tighten regulations. One minute we're told how brilliant the vaccine rollout has been, the next they're saying we can't actually increase freedoms despite it.

I just wish they could be honest and say we don't know whats going to happen next, no one can. We can model our best predictions but even then it can't be perfect. There's enough uncertainty as there is so throwing out endless headline grabbing statements isn't going to help either 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matt42 said:

Truly think if there’s another lockdown we may start seeing rioting. 

Nah, they're making it abundantly clear they're going to fudge future stuff like they're doing with these current restrictions: just strangle certain businesses and pass the buck around rather than locking down. As long as the British public can get a pint somewhere, somehow, then they're not arsed enough to riot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Uh oh... though it's unlikely IMO bojo will agree

To be fair that’s the Mirror being sensationalist dickheads. He doesn’t say any such thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What’s stopping Chris from saying how he really feels?

My prediction is he doesn’t want to the guy that says we can’t save everyone. Just like the flu, even with all the medicine in the world and vaccines available we average about 200-300 deaths a week for it. I think he knows that there’s only so much that can be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

What’s stopping Chris from saying how he really feels?

My prediction is he doesn’t want to the guy that says we can’t save everyone. Just like the flu, even with all the medicine in the world and vaccines available we average about 200-300 deaths a week for it. I think he knows that there’s only so much that can be done.

He already said as much months ago 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

What’s stopping Chris from saying how he really feels?

My prediction is he doesn’t want to the guy that says we can’t save everyone. Just like the flu, even with all the medicine in the world and vaccines available we average about 200-300 deaths a week for it. I think he knows that there’s only so much that can be done.

Maybe he wants to hang around and save as many lives as he can ? If he goes too honest Boris dispenses with his services ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

 

I get the impression from those comments that he's not too keen on us relaxing all restrictions after seeing the most current data and this is he why of trying to say something without explicitly saying it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, crazyfool1 said:

Maybe he wants to hang around and save as many lives as he can ? If he goes too honest Boris dispenses with his services ? 

Nah, he won’t get rid of him! Even the most stupid general public will realise something’s up if witty ends up on indy sage!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, mcshed said:

As I said after the Waterstones announcement I suspect virtually everywhere will have signs asking you to "please wear a face covering" how strictly people take that is yet to be seen.

Looks like we're (YHA) going down the route of staff wearing them and guests requested to. We're getting rid of some ways we've operated and keeping others. Some of the ones we've kept are going to cause issues (nothing major, but will piss some people off now they aren't backed up by being 'official'). Will be interesting to see what happens now with different people's reactions/behaviour. It'll be like a live test of some of the differing views in this thread. Although if you are still pretty worried/cautious the maybe a 250 bed youth hostel isn't the place for you right now

Edited by philipsteak
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Ozanne said:

I get the impression from those comments that he's not too keen on us relaxing all restrictions after seeing the most current data and this is he why of trying to say something without explicitly saying it.

He's worried about hospitals being overwhelmed. Of course we'll have to live with a certain amount of deaths from it, can't get rid of the thing now, but health services need to be able to manage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Barry Fish said:

So if someone doesn't want to wear a mask what happens? Is it a request or a mandate in reality?

At the moment I don't know, I'm on my days off. Will get more detail when I'm back in. The all staff email from the ceo said something like 'strongly encouraged'. Whether that goes beyond a strongly worded sign I have no idea yet. 

Hospitality only got the new guidelines late on Wednesday night. Which was helpful. A lot of planning would have been done based on what was expected but still... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
    • Definitely. UKIP also used Merkel welcoming 1 million Afgans to Europe in 2015 during the brexit vote.   Politicians in other countries within the EU know the are going to lose voters to parties to the right of them over stuff like this and they've no control over it.
    • I think it will very much vary on who there is to book who they know will sell out a day.    They’ve co-headline and full headline stuff in future, there no reason at all they won’t do it again, even if it means cutting someone’s set by 15 mins or having a band less in a big bands day…   They’re not going to not book Foo fighters and instead get the equivalent of Florence and C&S just to not have a band do a big set…   …unless of course they think it will make them more money…
    • Maybe some right wing leaders like Meloni are just playing to their base, like Reform have been here talking about them ending up at Calais.
    • Citizenship via investment programs basically work by saying if you invest this much in our economy (say buy a property worth x) then we will either grant you citizenship or residency with a route to it. The EU has rules on how low countries can set the bar. Montenegro was one of the easier ones to get and they've had to tighten it up.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...