Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

Now IS this what's happening for April? Or are we opportunistically blaming an expected drop in vaccines on the EU to deflect? 

This issue is apparently unrelated to the EU playing hardball. This particular issue is because of manufacturing issues in India relating to the Oxford jab.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

 

One for @Toilet Duck, but I think the 80% drop of hospitalisation is measured against a control group who've not had the vaccine as opposed to against a control group of people who tested positive without the vaccine.

That's pretty much how they have been defining effectiveness, 100 unvaccinated people hospitalised, 20 vaccinated people with similar characteristics hospitalised, vaccine is 80% effective at preventing hospitalisations...(it's not as clean a measure as efficacy in a randomised trial, but it is the real impact of the vaccine in practical terms when you define what outcome you want it to reduce)...Everyone's risk reduces if the vaccine suppresses transmission as there's less of it about (so the questions about how many people would end up infected at Glastonbury for example can't really be worked out simply by looking at the number of people there and the effectiveness of the vaccine, as it entirely depends on the prevalence of the virus, how many of those in attendance are vaccinated, host factors like co-morbidities, age etc and, I guess, intrinsic properties of the virus itself...as we've seen, some variants spread a bit more easily than others!). So, theoretically, the "effectiveness" of the vaccines will improve as more people are vaccinated since herd immunity contributes to the overall impact of their use. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was just talking to a mate in the US who had his second jab of the Pfizer vaccine on Monday (for some reason they haven't changed to a 12 week gap out there and are sticking with 3 weeks) and I'm told that the second shot of Pfizer has AWFUL side effects. 

 

For nearly a full 24 hours he was oscillating between having to lie under his duvet with 3 layers on, and having to drink ice cold water because his temp was 102.5F. 

 

He did wake up this morning feeling normal but for reference this guy is 26, has one medium risk health condition and had no side effects from the initial shot in late February.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

Was just talking to a mate in the US who had his second jab of the Pfizer vaccine on Monday (for some reason they haven't changed to a 12 week gap out there and are sticking with 3 weeks) and I'm told that the second shot of Pfizer has AWFUL side effects. 

 

For nearly a full 24 hours he was oscillating between having to lie under his duvet with 3 layers on, and having to drink ice cold water because his temp was 102.5F. 

 

He did wake up this morning feeling normal but for reference this guy is 26, has one medium risk health condition and had no side effects from the initial shot in late February.

I’m a similar age to your friend and I’ve also had my second Pfizer jab and I was pretty much fine. I felt tired the following day and had a temperature for a few hours but that was about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had my 1st AZ jab yesterday- arm is fine but had to go to bed this afternoon as felt completely washed out and a bit shivery - couldn’t focus on working. Feel ok now just tired ( slept for 4 hours earlier). Am feeling cautiously optimistic and planning a few things for end July/August and next year just to have something to look forward to. Just glad I have been able to work at home all through the last year, although has been lonely living on my own and am now so over MS teams meetings or trying to deliver virtual training- I need to be in a room with other people!! It’s been a weird year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

The resident of Tanzania a covid skeptic has died of covid.

One thing we've learnt over the past year is that it seems covid-sceptical politicians are particularly susceptible to covid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr.Tease said:

One thing we've learnt over the past year is that it seems covid-sceptical politicians are particularly susceptible to covid

how many have we had ? boris , trump , bolsanaro , macron (not a sceptic ) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ryan1984 said:

Crazy idea but as a journalist, maybe he could try and find out?

Peston is really one of the worst journalists, thick and happy to be manipulated shamelessly (or its possible he's so thick he's genuinely not aware when this happens) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

 

She's really making Person look like a right prick by providing some actual information.

Peston's given up- he's now taken to asking people on twitter to tell him what's happening :

 

Edited by Mr.Tease
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, crazyfool1 said:

how many have we had ? boris , trump , bolsanaro , macron (not a sceptic ) 

Doug Christie and a few other fellow right wing horrors in the US too! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Not quite, but he had been in denial shortly before he caught it, going round shaking people's hands and all that.

Yeah that wasn’t great. I still maintain that the “blame” of the first wave falls more on the scientists who were treating it as a flu pandemic and did not advise the government to use a lockdown. To an extent it was just misfortune that we were incredibly well prepared for a pandemic... just not an airborne one.

 

The second wave is squarely on Boris though. The scientists told him to lock down in that instance and he baulked for weeks if not months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...