Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Homer said:

This whole episode tells us one thing: the PM really, really can't be bothered to actually do his own job.

I think he's aware that the more he's front and centre and open for scrutiny from opposition and journalists, the bigger a tit he's come across. He'd have tied himself up in all sorts of knots answering these questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Homer said:

This whole episode tells us one thing: the PM really, really can't be bothered to actually do his own job.

Correct, he wanted  desperately to be PM but can’t be arsed with the grave responsibility that goes with the job. Of course Cummings should go but it’s taken attention away from the distinct probability that the government dithered in starting the lock down and that has caused thousands of preventable deaths. If that is proved then the government, not just Cummings, has to resign. Those early days of public information being just wash your hands and sing happy birthday was woefully inadequate. The same goes for not shutting down air travel in the early days of the crisis. The death total in this country is disgraceful bearing in mind we are a developed nation with a brilliant NHS that has had to deal with the consequences of government inaction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

Floundering.

It’s very odd that the Transport Secretary is front and centre to answer all of these questions?

Almost indicates they don't like him! 

And Boris's absence is bizarre.  Before I criticise this I am aware he is someone who recently been in intensive care;   however if his absence has been due to health then that should be made clear that he is on restricted duties.  His absence throughout the majority of covid issues comes across as lazy, uncaring, and basically being an arse.  

Also watching the marr interview his answer on whether the decision was made to threat to life made me laugh out loud- a 4 year old cannot wash themselves......bloody hell the kid sounded on the precipice of existence!

Edited by basicminds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloody hell. Now Shapps seemingly saying it was okay to drive 30 miles to a tourist destination after an isolation period on Easter Sunday? He's all over the place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they're seemingly conceding the point he drove to Barnard Castle but arguing it was after the isolation period.

Firstly, that's still against guidelines and arguably worse, because he obviously just fancied a jolly over Easter.

Secondly, why was he still in Durham after he had recovered? Should he not leave his second home and return to London to, you know, continue his job? Seems to me like he just had a lovely Easter weekend with his parents and a nice day trip. When the nation was told NOT to see family or travel over that weekend.

And Shapps claiming he didn't have direct discussions with Cummings about this before appearing on various news channels. The incompetence and the compulsive lying is a staggering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jparx said:

So they're seemingly conceding the point he drove to Barnard Castle but arguing it was after the isolation period.

Firstly, that's still against guidelines and arguably worse, because he obviously just fancied a jolly over Easter.

Secondly, why was he still in Durham after he had recovered? Should he not leave his second home and return to London to, you know, continue his job? Seems to me like he just had a lovely Easter weekend with his parents and a nice day trip. When the nation was told NOT to see family or travel over that weekend.

And Shapps claiming he didn't have direct discussions with Cummings about this before appearing on various news channels. The incompetence and the compulsive lying is a staggering.

Weren't we instructed by a sit down boris not to go out over easter weekend as they were extra worried with time off/nice weather we would all go out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, philipsteak said:

So did Cummings' dad grass him up to Durham Police then? 

No he contacted them about a security matter ... perhaps he was seeking advice about locking Cummings in his room ... so he couldn’t travel !! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marr summed it up nicely by saying “You can keep Cummings or you can keep the policy intact.”
Which puts the ball firmly in Boris’ court of which matters more: Cummings or the safety of the nation? And I think we all know the answer to that one ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...