Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, eFestivals said:

no, not really.

I just think it's highly likely that 'headlining' (if they are) would have been part of any gossip he heard about them playing, and it would have also been likely to be repeated too.

Remember, when he said it, he was saying it as something of interest to his listeners - and 'headlining' would certainly be of interest to them.

No, not really.

The 18 year olds listening to Radio 1 don’t give a fuck whether The Strokes are headlining or subbing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was interesting in that Emily interview with George Ezra how she told him that Kylie was playing prior to it being announced, I know it only sounded like a day or two but she's clearly not completely averse to telling people stuff. You can easily see how people like Grimshaw get to hear some pretty solid rumours.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

Let's also not forget the production folks behind her shows are obviously ultra talented in what they do so to alter it so it fits in to the staging at the festival is part of the job!

I'm in agreement with this.  I haven't seen her Vegas show, but I'm certain it's nothing that couldn't be adapted fairly easily to the Glastonbury stage.  She is active, so its not like she has to rehearse a band / group of dancers etc out of nowhere.  In terms of motivation to do it, if she's planning a tour after the Vegas residency, what better advertisement than knocking it out of the park on the Pyramid Stage?  I'm convincing myself here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
4 minutes ago, Bradders said:

No, not really.

The 18 year olds listening to Radio 1 don’t give a fuck whether The Strokes are headlining or subbing.

yeah, because there's never a big deal about Glastonbury headliners, or large festival headliners in general.

Which is why you don't care if they're headlining or not.

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

yeah, because there's never a big deal about Glastonbury headliners, or large festival headliners in general.

Which is why you don't care if they're headlining or not.

:P

Yeah but I’m not a normal person, I’ve been on your website discussing this shit for 13 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, swede said:

The Strokes subbing Arctic Monkeys, that's my prediction. AM are about to go back out on tour until April, still cant see why it couldn't be them headlining.

Their website has them finishing touring in April.  Have they announced further dates?

Edited by Username taken
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Scotdy said:

It must be The Who. In the middle of a tour, free that weekend, playing Wembley Stadium the week after Glastonbury and would shift a load of late tickets if the put in a good performance on BBC. A 4 year gap is more than when Coldplay have headlined. 

It won't be The Who. Having them back in 2015 was daft, having them yet again in 2019 would just be ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Strokes are the May's deal of headliners. The house of efests cannot agree who it is, but we agree it's not them, aside from a few useless lunatics who won't let the idea go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't get the Gaga thing. 

Am I right in thinking the main reason for thinking it could be her is because it's likely Bradley Cooper will be playing The Park? If there's nothing else substantial then there's really as much (or as little) chance of it being her as it is any of the other unlikely suggestions. She just feels more realistic cause she's got a lot of support on these boards and keeps getting mentioned in hope rather then expection.

Edited by SwedgeAntilles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

I really don't get the Gaga thing. 

Am I right in thinking the main reason for thinking it could be her is because it's likely Bradley Cooper will be playing The Park? If there's nothing else substantial then there's really as much (or as little) chance of it being her as it is any of the other unlikely suggestions. She just feels more realistic cause she's got a lot of support on these boards and keeps getting mentioned in hope rather then expection.

True but there's nothing substantial for any of the others in the frame either. 

 

So until then we are all guessing/hoping. 

Edited by Doug85
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

I really don't get the Gaga thing. 

Am I right in thinking the main reason for thinking it could be her is because it's likely Bradley Cooper will be playing The Park? If there's nothing else substantial then there's really as much (or as little) chance of it being her as it is any of the other unlikely suggestions. She just feels more realistic cause she's got a lot of support on these boards and keeps getting mentioned in hope rather then expection.

I think there are a few little things that in isolation mean little but when added together - Cooper, the gap in her Vegas residency, her strange "am I allow to talk about that?" last festival, the cancelled tour from last year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don’t want it to be strokes personally. But. 

Could stormzy, cure, strokes fit the Micky Eavis comment of 2/3 never played [headlined] before? Or is that pinch of salt? 

I agree, that could still be the likes of Madge, LDR, Gaga etc. 

Just a thought!

do agree with Neil though, if radio one had info of a headliner, grimshaw would break his neck to make sure it was ‘headliner’ gossip, makes good radio I presume ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...