Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Hugh Jass said:

Fuggedaboutit.

 

7 minutes ago, henry bear said:

Fella tweeted various E Street members about Glastonbury 2019. SVZ replied ‘we’re ready’. 

 

Appreciated both of those.

I assume that's just an enthusiastic response rather than cause for rumours. Though Bruce & E Street would be the only Pyramid headliner I would make sure I see. In spite reviews on here of the last time they played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 1986 said:

 

 

Appreciated both of those.

I assume that's just an enthusiastic response rather than cause for rumours. Though Bruce & E Street would be the only Pyramid headliner I would make sure I see. In spite reviews on here of the last time they played.

There are people still in comas from the last time he played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

There are people still in comas from the last time he played.

What was the issue? Not enough hits or he was just boring to watch? I'm curious how a back catalogue like his can be such a let down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a great time but I'm a Springsteen fan and it was my 1st time seeing him plus my 1st G.

 

Just looking at the setlist and it started a bit slow but the  encore and last few songs were on point.

Loads around were waiting for Born in the USA and I was like he's wont play so a few left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Divein said:

I had a great time but I'm a Springsteen fan and it was my 1st time seeing him plus my 1st G.

 

Just looking at the setlist and it started a bit slow but the  encore and last few songs were on point.

Loads around were waiting for Born in the USA and I was like he's wont play so a few left.

I just looked at it and yeah maybe it starts bit heavy with "new" stuff but he hits the classics as well. Those three covers in the middle would slow it down for me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm by no means a big fan but had heard great things about his live show so went along quite excited. Was so bored. Really just one for the hardcore fans - and I stayed to the end. I've no doubt it was a great performance if you're a fan, but he was really just playing to the fans. And he went over curfew, it seemed to last for bloody ever. I think a good headline set should aim to be a bit more accessible.

Doubt they'd play again, though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

I'm by no means a big fan but had heard great things about his live show so went along quite excited. Was so bored. Really just one for the hardcore fans - and I stayed to the end. I've no doubt it was a great performance if you're a fan, but he was really just playing to the fans. And he went over curfew, it seemed to last for bloody ever. I think a good headline set should aim to be a bit more accessible.

Doubt they'd play again, though. 

Agreed, even the fans don't want to be surrounded by a bunch of bored people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone think we might get an early announcement of a headliner this year? Maybe just before or just after Ticket day.

I'm sure it has happened in previous years but I might be imagining it. We usually have quite a few announced acts before the big reveal in April?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
7 minutes ago, beau1 said:

Does anyone think we might get an early announcement of a headliner this year? Maybe just before or just after Ticket day.

I very much doubt we'll get anything before ticket day.

And while it seems quite possible that The Cure are signed and sealed and could be announced at any time from now, my guess is that they'll be held back for a long while so that the festivals that need to sell tickets on their appearance get a good shot at it - possibly until April.

Glastonbury don't need to announce early, and most if not all of the earlier announcements are driven by the band's wishes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, beau1 said:

Does anyone think we might get an early announcement of a headliner this year? Maybe just before or just after Ticket day.

I'm sure it has happened in previous years but I might be imagining it. We usually have quite a few announced acts before the big reveal in April?

You need the all hallowed thingy for dates and undiscernable patterns. Normally the legend slot is known quite early on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...