Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, fraybentos1 said:

Dunno if anyone saw the size of the crowd Chappell got at Austin City Limits the other day but it reinforced that if they have secured her followed by O Rod on the Sunday then it is absolutely huge. Some years the stars just align I guess. 

 

Austin City Limits in Texas, USA. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

Yes I know where it is. What's your point? Was just saying it's one of the biggest crowds ive ever seen

 

My point is that we are not in the USA and she's not pulling one of the biggest crowds you've ever seen at Glastonbury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fraybentos1 said:

Dunno if anyone saw the size of the crowd Chappell got at Austin City Limits the other day but it reinforced that if they have secured her followed by O Rod on the Sunday then it is absolutely huge.

 

 

 

5 minutes ago, stuie said:

 

My point is that we are not in the USA and she's not pulling one of the biggest crowds you've ever seen at Glastonbury. 

I didn't say she was gonna pull one of the biggest crowds at glastonbury though did I? I said it reinforced to me how popular she is currently that an non headliner could pack a field like that . You're arguing against something I never said. She will get a huge crowd is she plays though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, efcfanwirral said:

I think many younger attendees would not call Pulp interesting or exciting! 

 

I consider myself young and I'd love to see Pulp at Glasto, even though I saw them a few months ago. 

 

Anyway, I understand that booking a lineup the size of Glastonbury is complex and there are many factors to consider. But for me, it's rare and quite unusual that there are subs like Chappell who could draw a bigger crowd than a hideliner like the 1975. But maybe I'm underestimating them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jamm said:

In two minds. Love Muse, would definitely be there with bells on but have seen them on the Pyramid already and a handful of other times.

I'm the same on having seen them on there twice before, but I'll be right down the front if they do play and they'd be the one I look forward to the most. Currently hoping for something, anything, else from them next summer as all their gigs are Glastonbury week currently.

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, fraybentos1 said:

It's 6 months out from the festival. Just cause The 1975 aren't about right this minute doesn't mean they won't be by the summer. I feel like it is better when Glasto gets bands on the start of a fresh ear than the end of an old one personally.

 

Anyway with the rumoured subs it is already clear the Pyramid will be vastly stronger than last year. And that's before you even consider the newest chat of Sabrina Carpenter being in talks.


What are the rumoured subs? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, fraybentos1 said:

It's 6 months out from the festival. Just cause The 1975 aren't about right this minute doesn't mean they won't be by the summer. I feel like it is better when Glasto gets bands on the start of a fresh ear than the end of an old one personally.

 

Anyway with the rumoured subs it is already clear the Pyramid will be vastly stronger than last year. And that's before you even consider the newest chat of Sabrina Carpenter being in talks.

Each to their own and all that but I watched PJ Harvey, LCD and Little Simz and didn't see any of the pyramid headliners. I was really happy with the subs last year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chip Batch said:

Each to their own and all that but I watched PJ Harvey, LCD and Little Simz and didn't see any of the pyramid headliners. I was really happy with the subs last year.

 

Saw the LCD set on TV and it’s such a shame they didn’t have longer.

 

Really they’re a their own show or headline act, let them really dive into the more marauding songs. They were great at APE.

 

40-60 minutes doesn’t do them justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, RosaAG said:

 

I consider myself young and I'd love to see Pulp at Glasto, even though I saw them a few months ago. 

 

Anyway, I understand that booking a lineup the size of Glastonbury is complex and there are many factors to consider. But for me, it's rare and quite unusual that there are subs like Chappell who could draw a bigger crowd than a hideliner like the 1975. But maybe I'm underestimating them.

 


I don’t like The 1975 and won’t be watching but they’ll get a big crowd for sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jamm said:

Matt Healy does something misogynistic / racist - some other from of ist -> 1975 get pulled and replaced with Muse.

 

In two minds. Love Muse, would definitely be there with bells on but have seen them on the Pyramid already and a handful of other times.

 

I want a night away from the Pyramid though!

Seem to remember the first I heard of The 1975 was opening for Muse at the Arsenal FC stadium in 2013, albeit on the second night whereas I went to see Bastille on night one instead.

 

I was under the assumption Muse will turn up somewhere else in the UK tbh. If less sure as to what given many of the places I thought they might surface have released line-ups without them on.

Edited by charlierc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jamm said:

Saw the LCD set on TV and it’s such a shame they didn’t have longer.

 

Really they’re a their own show or headline act, let them really dive into the more marauding songs. They were great at APE.

 

40-60 minutes doesn’t do them justice.

They had 75 minutes on the bill, but wish it had been 75 hours. They were so good. Actually the only act I saw on the Pyramid this year other than Femi Kuti. So much amazing stuff going on across all the other stages throughout the fest though, so didn’t feel like minimal Pyramid impacted my fest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, fraybentos1 said:

Dunno if anyone saw the size of the crowd Chappell got at Austin City Limits the other day but it reinforced that if they have secured her followed by O Rod on the Sunday then it is absolutely huge. Some years the stars just align I guess. 

 

 things change so fast these days- If you'd said 12-18 months ago that Sabrina, Chappell and Charli XCX would be some of the bigggest names they could book, people would think you're mad. Who gives a f**k if Neil young gets a medium sized crowds if you have other bookings like that. Plus if Michael wants him headlining thats as good a reason as any.


 

you mean Lolla. Acl is only 80,000 people. Lolla is 120,000. Ive been in that field when it was packed for Radiohead in 2008 at their essential peak for arguments sake. The Chappell crowd was larger. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, hjwright said:

I love popping on to this thread every few days. 
 

theres always a new headliner combo that everybody is 100% confident on.

 

it's all solid info, until the next solid info! 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...