Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, nikkic said:


It’s obviously very dependent upon musical tastes, but I think ending the night with a party is fairly easy if you look outside the main 5 stages. 
 

Always something going off with Arcadia, IICON etc 

 

The night beginneth after the headliners of the main stage finisheth 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SirPsychoSexy said:

Reading through this and there are some right entitled snobs in here! Are people forgetting the concept of a festival?  Multiple stages, multiple acts to pick from.  If you don’t like a headliner you have the choice to go elsewhere.   

 

Well thank you @SirPsychoSexy that is brand new information!

 

P.S. You sound nice 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Talcroft said:

Apart from them being bilge, this is my main concern. They're not 'doing' anything - they don't feel current or interesting in any way. Last album was 2022 and on an indefinite hiatus... Just doesn't make sense to me as a booking. Is it reactionary post-Sza to just go safe? 


They make total sense, they are currently one of the biggest UK acts around, sold out their last tour here & had sell out dates over in the US including MSG.   Plenty of hits, so much so that some popular hits would have to be omitted from the set list because there’s that many to choose from, & its highly likely that they would have a new single to promote so it would probably be the start of their next album cycle followed by another tour.  
 

And the great thing about Glastonbury is there are other stages to choose from if they’re not your cup of tea, as after all music is subjective.  
 

I have no doubt they would pull a big crowd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Muse headlining a french festival - HellFest on Friday 20th June, maybe increases the odds of a glastonbury visit. Actually doing quite a few festivals, ending up in Norway on 25th June. Then nothing else mentioned

Edited by Squonk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Squonk said:

Muse headlining a french festival - HellFest on Friday 20th June, maybe increases the odds of a glastonbury visit. Actually doing quite a few festivals, ending up in Norway on 25th June. Then nothing else mentioned

That would be lovely!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, SirPsychoSexy said:

Reading through this and there are some right entitled snobs in here! Are people forgetting the concept of a festival?  Multiple stages, multiple acts to pick from.  If you don’t like a headliner you have the choice to go elsewhere.   
 

 

Username checks out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Squonk said:

Muse headlining a french festival - HellFest on Friday 20th June, maybe increases the odds of a glastonbury visit. Actually doing quite a few festivals, ending up in Norway on 25th June. Then nothing else mentioned

Matt Healy does something misogynistic / racist - some other from of ist -> 1975 get pulled and replaced with Muse.

 

In two minds. Love Muse, would definitely be there with bells on but have seen them on the Pyramid already and a handful of other times.

 

I want a night away from the Pyramid though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's 6 months out from the festival. Just cause The 1975 aren't about right this minute doesn't mean they won't be by the summer. I feel like it is better when Glasto gets bands on the start of a fresh ear than the end of an old one personally.

 

Anyway with the rumoured subs it is already clear the Pyramid will be vastly stronger than last year. And that's before you even consider the newest chat of Sabrina Carpenter being in talks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was the actual information that led us to the 1975 conclusion? Because I agree with someone who said earlier that it doesn't really make sense if they're on indefinite hiatus, don't have much going on at the mo and have no shows booked around then?

Not impossible of course, I'm sure its happened over the years, but doesn't quite feel as concrete when framed like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And on the topic of people whinging about other people whinging, it's borderline £400! I think you're entitled to your own view when there's that much of your own money being put in. I personally don't care about the line-up as I've been enough now that I'm just buzzing to be back on the farm, but if I wasn't and had committed to spending £375 on a ticket + Car Park Pass + Travel Arrangements + Camping Equipment + Spending Money etc on 6 headliners I actively dislike - I'd have a big whinge on a forum too.

 

There is of course the option of forfeiting £75 during a cost of living crisis, but I think most will chance their luck. Let people be raging they're spending their hard-earned money on a line-up they hate, and just reassure them they'll be grand. Chill. The last two years have been a drop-off, in my opinion, after the 50th in terms of objective household name star power and bucket list acts, but maybe that's the way it's going and that is fine by me personally. But it's also fine if you're gutted because you wanted to see at least one of your favourite "Triple A" acts. Personally, I hope they're all bad info x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunno if anyone saw the size of the crowd Chappell got at Austin City Limits the other day but it reinforced that if they have secured her followed by O Rod on the Sunday then it is absolutely huge. Some years the stars just align I guess. 

 

 things change so fast these days- If you'd said 12-18 months ago that Sabrina, Chappell and Charli XCX would be some of the bigggest names they could book, people would think you're mad. Who gives a f**k if Neil young gets a medium sized crowds if you have other bookings like that. Plus if Michael wants him headlining thats as good a reason as any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ac123 said:

What was the actual information that led us to the 1975 conclusion? Because I agree with someone who said earlier that it doesn't really make sense if they're on indefinite hiatus, don't have much going on at the mo and have no shows booked around then?

Not impossible of course, I'm sure its happened over the years, but doesn't quite feel as concrete when framed like that.

At least 3 good sources saying it. Replaced Fred Again apparently. 

 

indefinite hiatus is a very dramatic way of saying 'between albums'. They never leave long between albums. Also it is only december 2024

 

6 minutes ago, ac123 said:

There is of course the option of forfeiting £75 during a cost of living crisis

thought you got 50 quid back? so it's 25 quid outlay if you hate the lineup that much and give up your tix

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, fraybentos1 said:

At least 3 good sources saying it. Replaced Fred Again apparently. 

 

indefinite hiatus is a very dramatic way of saying 'between albums'. They never leave long between albums. Also it is only december 2024

 

thought you got 50 quid back? so it's 25 quid outlay if you hate the lineup that much and give up your tix

Ah okay, fair play on the 1975, just thought it was worth checking!

On the refund, I'm not sure actually! I always assumed it was a full deposit that you lost, but I've never gave my tickets up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ac123 said:

Ah okay, fair play on the 1975, just thought it was worth checking!

On the refund, I'm not sure actually! I always assumed it was a full deposit that you lost, but I've never gave my tickets up.

I'd like to think that no one has ever given up their ticket purely on the strength (or lack of) of the Headline acts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ac123 said:

What was the actual information that led us to the 1975 conclusion? Because I agree with someone who said earlier that it doesn't really make sense if they're on indefinite hiatus, don't have much going on at the mo and have no shows booked around then?

Not impossible of course, I'm sure its happened over the years, but doesn't quite feel as concrete when framed like that.

 

You think they wouldn't want to headline the G as a one-off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

You think they wouldn't want to headline the G as a one-off?

Of course they would, as would any British act. But in a headliners forum where we're looking for clues as to who is playing, I was just curious as to the lack of clues for them. But if there's three good sources, there's three good sources. Fair play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

It's 6 months out from the festival. Just cause The 1975 aren't about right this minute doesn't mean they won't be by the summer. I feel like it is better when Glasto gets bands on the start of a fresh ear than the end of an old one personally.

 

Anyway with the rumoured subs it is already clear the Pyramid will be vastly stronger than last year. And that's before you even consider the newest chat of Sabrina Carpenter being in talks.


Where are we up to with subs now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jamm said:

Matt Healy does something misogynistic / racist - some other from of ist -> 1975 get pulled and replaced with Muse.

 

In two minds. Love Muse, would definitely be there with bells on but have seen them on the Pyramid already and a handful of other times.

 

I want a night away from the Pyramid though!

 

Muse would be a fantastic headliner. I don't really get The 1975 - decent band but a nothing pick for me. Maybe I'm just getting old!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Talcroft said:

Apart from them being bilge, this is my main concern. They're not 'doing' anything - they don't feel current or interesting in any way. Last album was 2022 and on an indefinite hiatus... Just doesn't make sense to me as a booking. Is it reactionary post-Sza to just go safe? 

For me I think The 1975 coming on and doing some experimental new music would lead to the same complaints but afterwards. Them coming on and doing a full greatest hits set sounds like the perfect thing, people would know every single song. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...