Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

So just easier on everyone to give the man the Legend Slot like he wants cos he knows he's better suited for it 

 

Yeah, he's better suited for the legend slot, there would be no conversation about if he's big enough - a nice sunny Sunday afternoon and it would be one for the ages.  Even Noel Gallagher would be loving it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would she even play the festival now? The only reason massive artists like her take the smaller financial offer of Glasto headline slot is to get the TV exposure to sell records to compensate for it surely?

 

She doesn't need the TV exposure as her records sell like hotcakes already. She's not my cup of tea at all but it's probably fair to say she's the biggest artist on the planet right now.  I think 2020 was it. That was the window for her and the pandemic saw to that. 

 

Personally I wouldn't mind it if she did play as if I got a ticket it would make it much easier to get a good spot at Other Stage or West Holts for the headline spot.

 

Maybe she will come back when her star has faded a bit towards the end of her career. I'm sure she probably will do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Benjsh said:

Why would she even play the festival now? The only reason massive artists like her take the smaller financial offer of Glasto headline slot is to get the TV exposure to sell records to compensate for it surely?

 

She doesn't need the TV exposure as her records sell like hotcakes already. She's not my cup of tea at all but it's probably fair to say she's the biggest artist on the planet right now.  I think 2020 was it. That was the window for her and the pandemic saw to that. 

 

Personally I wouldn't mind it if she did play as if I got a ticket it would make it much easier to get a good spot at Other Stage or West Holts for the headline spot.

 

Maybe she will come back when her star has faded a bit towards the end of her career. I'm sure she probably will do. 

She might just want to make it up as she wanted it checked of her list in any case? 
 

Pretty sure she was already asking a giga sum in 2020 in any case, even though her fandom went crazy since Covid. If I can be optimist, if she wants to do it I believe the money would even be less of a driver than it was in 2020. With her being a billionaire and all now.
 

Last names in the loop get me extra excited, curious to what it’ll turn out to be in the end! Afraid it’ll be until a poster drop again this year though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Benjsh said:

Why would she even play the festival now?


The only reason I can think of is that she previously agreed to do it, and she seemed to genuinely form a strong bond, not least with Billy Bragg. She’s made more than enough money off the Eras tour, that wouldn’t really be a primary motivation right now.

 

But more realistically, given the sheer effort she’s put into Eras, I’d think she’d be more in the frame for 2027/8. If they somehow manage to bag her for next year though, holy hell that’s a coup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

By reality, yeah.

 

If you read the article lede it's basically referring to a change in the bookies odds 

 

And as is so often the case, given that no bookie has been offering it as an active market for a couple weeks, it's based on entirely fictional odds rather than actual betting.

 

This is 100% a combination of a bookie (in this case Betway) looking for some free publicity and crap news outlets looking for clicks. Glastonbury and Taylor Swift each bring those things so why wouldn't they combine the two into one story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I struggle to understand why, once the bills are paid and the bank is full,

you wouldn’t want 100k fans in the pyramid field singing your hits back to you. I’d do it for free (if I was her) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, stuie said:

I struggle to understand why, once the bills are paid and the bank is full,

you wouldn’t want 100k fans in the pyramid field singing your hits back to you. I’d do it for free (if I was her) 

I guess we don’t know the affinity she may have or may not with the festival … probably none so she could have that feeling anywhere 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, stuie said:

I struggle to understand why, once the bills are paid and the bank is full,

you wouldn’t want 100k fans in the pyramid field singing your hits back to you. I’d do it for free (if I was her) 

Give it a go outside the Ridge and Furrow! We'll be there (if we get tickets) 🥰

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, stuie said:

I struggle to understand why, once the bills are paid and the bank is full,

you wouldn’t want 100k fans in the pyramid field singing your hits back to you. I’d do it for free (if I was her) 

What if you do a massive stadium tour and get 100k fans singing your hits back to you and a fat wad of $$$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, stuie said:

I struggle to understand why, once the bills are paid and the bank is full,

you wouldn’t want 100k fans in the pyramid field singing your hits back to you. I’d do it for free (if I was her) 

 

Sure, but that's going to be factored against many other things - such as her own plans, goals, and schedule for the year. If she's coming off an extensive 2 year world tour, it might be a case of "no more live shows for a bit". Or Glastonbury might just not fit with whatever her intentions are musically, or she might have a show in mind that can't be translated to a festival stage (as the Eras tour was).

 

Remember that this is not someone who half-arses things. If she plays, then she's coming with a set that's fully thought through designed to blow people away so even doing it as a one-off would become weeks worth of planning and rehearsals.

 

I'm very confident that Taylor Swift will headline Glastonbury one day, and I'd suspect she already has a vague idea as to when that's likely to be. Unfortunately though I don't expect it in the near future, certainly not 2025 and even 2027/8 probably feel too soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stuie said:

I struggle to understand why, once the bills are paid and the bank is full,

you wouldn’t want 100k fans in the pyramid field singing your hits back to you. I’d do it for free (if I was her) 

 

52 minutes ago, Acid_Haze said:

What if you do a massive stadium tour and get 100k fans singing your hits back to you and a fat wad of $$$

 

Because of this above. If and when she returns she'll sell an absolute wad of tickets that will be she won't need to hit Glastonbury yet. She's only 34, got years ahead of her to be able to do it is she wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...