Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, gigpusher said:

There are many hugely popular artists that I know nothing by and the small amounts of exposure I have had to them don't make me inclined to want to know them anymore.

 

This!

Don't know why it's so difficult to understand that some people don't get to hear certain bands and/or songs.

Edited by Skip997
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Skip997 said:

This!

Don't why it's so difficult to understand that some people don't get to hear certain bands and/or songs.

Welcome back @Skip997I for one quite like hearing your alternative views on things. 

And will happily admit I have some probably quite shocking gaps in my musical knowledge as well. I wasn't brought up by music lovers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can include me in the Depeche Mode shout from the last page.

I know 3 songs of theirs - Enjoy the silence, Personal Jesus and Just can't get enough. 

I find it utterly bonkers when folk on here suggest them as headliners.

Being 33 though that's perhaps not a surprise though given their heyday was seemingly many moons before I entered the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dreams_burn_down said:

Everyone has their musical blind spots, either deliberately or otherwise! I quite enjoy the weird disconnect when you enjoy a song for the first time and then realise that seemingly everyone else knows it. Like, how has this passed me by for so long??

Massively true. Same as films, books and any other media.  The one that seems to keep popping up is that I've never seen Shawshank, for example.

Depending on your exposure through friends, where you socialise, what radio stations you do or don't listen to, it's really easy to bypass music. And yep, I love then discovering it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Quark said:

Massively true. Same as films, books and any other media.  The one that seems to keep popping up is that I've never seen Shawshank, for example.

Depending on your exposure through friends, where you socialise, what radio stations you do or don't listen to, it's really easy to bypass music. And yep, I love then discovering it!

That's the joy of it - and also why being proud of the gaps is such a weird flex. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, gigpusher said:

Music is a pretty broad church. I like to think I am pretty knowledgeable about music but every day Heardle from every era reminds me that the list of stuff I don't know is more than equal to that which I know. There are many hugely popular artists that I know nothing by and the small amounts of exposure I have had to them don't make me inclined to want to know them anymore.  It's ok for people to know and like different things. It's what Glastonbury encourages. They wouldn't have small tents in other areas of the festival if the main stages were all that was important. 

 

Of course it‘s fine for people to like different things, I certainly don’t like any of the Guns N’ Roses songs I mentioned! Not suggesting anyone should go and listen to them, just very surprised that people have managed to live their life without being subjected to Sweet Child of Mine. I suppose I grew up not knowing any Prince songs so it can happen but yeah, just very odd to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Quark said:

Massively true. Same as films, books and any other media.  The one that seems to keep popping up is that I've never seen Shawshank, for example.

Depending on your exposure through friends, where you socialise, what radio stations you do or don't listen to, it's really easy to bypass music. And yep, I love then discovering it!

I think the old truism really applies here - the more you learn about music, the more you realise how little you know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

That's the joy of it - and also why being proud of the gaps is such a weird flex. 

I don't think it's any weirder than the little frisson of pride you have for being into bands or whatever that no-one else has discovered yet. It's kinda the flipside of the same coin.

What I find weirdest of all is how...involved people seem to get over other's positions on such things.  But then I'm an old hippy, so what do I know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Prince is a very good one, couldn't have named you a Prince song until I was well into my teens.

I genuinely didn't realise Prince was a proper guitarist until the rock & roll hall of fame vid of while my guitar gently weeps was doing the rounds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

This!

Don't know why it's so difficult to understand that some people don't get to hear certain bands and/or songs.

Agreed. I've never knowingly heard a Harry Styles song in my life. Nor Blackpink, Doja Cat, Fred Again or many of the other artists regularly mentioned on here. I don't feel like I'm missing out - I've got thousands of records. There's only so many hours in the day you can spend listening to music - you can't possibly hear it all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also just because you have not heard of or could not name songs from a band, does not mean they should not headline as some people seem to imply.

 

i couldnt name or even say what the 1975 sound like, but still think they could headline.

 

Prince is also a great example, someone i thought was just big in America like some country artists 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kizzie said:

Yes, it is very sad. It appears if you disagree too much with the sneering bully's who seem to want to police some of these threads then your opinion is not valid and is to be ridiculed. 

 

Couldn't agree more. I guarantee those people wouldn't be half as arsey in person. There's something about forums, this more than most, that brings out the worst in people.

Good to see you back @Skip997

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from the age of about 8 (1983) until I was 12ish top of the pops on a Thursday night was the only place where I would see and hear new music unitl my parents got bskyb but that didnt have MTV it had The Power Station 😭 all the other times I had to listen to my parents play DR Hook on the car stereo 🤣

edit - now ive got Rollin Stone stuck in my head

Edited by gazzared
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have massive gaps in my knowledge of 80s/90s pop English speaking music, as I grew up in a country extremely proud of it's chanson. Didn't know anything about Diana Ross after the Supremes. I can name one or maybe two Rod Stewart songs. S Club 7 who's that? And I love Glastonbury. Why? Because there's freaking 100 stages for me to choose from. Why would I care that stage X has something I don't know/don't like? Or I will discover something new, or I will just find out something else. That is the beauty of Glastonbury. I will complain about line ups for smaller festivals where if you don't like any of the two artists playing at a certain time, and there's no pretty hill or wooded area or bonfire area to chill at, well that sucks. Not at Glasto. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...