Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, incident said:

Yep - looking at it, mid September 2021.

That September announcement was Paris for the original 25 June date 

https://www.eltonjohn.com/stories/forthcoming-farewell-yellow-brick-road-european-and-uk-tour-dates-rescheduled

Moving that date to whatever date it is now was much later, I think it was first spotted on here around May / June 2022

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, snoochie1981 said:

That September announcement was Paris for the original 25 June date 

https://www.eltonjohn.com/stories/forthcoming-farewell-yellow-brick-road-european-and-uk-tour-dates-rescheduled

Moving that date to whatever date it is now was much later, I think it was first spotted on here around May / June 2022

If memory serves, we picked up on the fact it had been moved shortly after this year's festival

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who knows, GNR could have just been an act on the fringe who had approached the festival during the COVID years. Nothing serious being put into place until a planned headliner didn’t pan out and there was finally scope to get them in.

@roughbloke’s info was that they were a replacement for Swift. I’m going to believe him because he’s been absolutely spot on about everything this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, waltere said:

If memory serves, we picked up on the fact it had been moved shortly after this year's festival

They could have planned Elton for Saturday and Taylor for Sunday. GNR rumoured to be doing a date Glasto Sunday right? Maybe they asked Elton if he could do Sunday instead and he adjusted his tour dates.

But also I can see Elton lightly agreeing for a long time and after Macca deciding to firm things up.

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SwallowOrSleepOnTheWetSpot said:

Because it went against her whole brand, that's why. People don't like hypocrites.

IDGAF if she plays Glasto or not, but this whole "you either stand with her or you're with the far right" narrative on the internet is insufferable AF.

You poor lamb I don't know how you cope. 

"People don't like hypocrites", therefore over three years later everyone brings up an incident she apologised for by the next day.

Have you ever read the coverage she gets in the US?  As with many artists there, she receives a lot of bigotry via social media or from right wing commentators - see much of the coverage about the stupid flute. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

This hasn't really happened though. Summer 2024 will be Tay-tastic.

Hopefully.

To be honest given she's able to fill stadiums multiple times every weekend for five solid months on the US tour, and still have huge demand for more, it's difficult to begrudge her doing it this way.

If she tried to cram both the US and Europe into the same year, then it'd mean fewer shows in each and so increased demand (and ultimately, bastard touts creaming off even more insane prices). I'm working to the assumption/hope that Europe in 2024 will be as extensive as the US dates this summer. Though in all honesty I'm less and less confident it includes Glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, incident said:

Hopefully.

To be honest given she's able to fill stadiums multiple times every weekend for five solid months on the US tour, and still have huge demand for more, it's difficult to begrudge her doing it this way.

If she tried to cram both the US and Europe into the same year, then it'd mean fewer shows in each and so increased demand (and ultimately, bastard touts creaming off even more insane prices). I'm working to the assumption/hope that Europe in 2024 will be as extensive as the US dates this summer. Though in all honesty I'm less and less confident it includes Glastonbury.

Doing the US first then Europe as a second leg is a fairly standard pattern for ginormo-tours.

I agree that the G isn't as much of a lock as it maybe once was - but if she makes an exception anywhere that'll be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Florian Saucer Attack said:

I hope so, even though I don't care for her music at all, but she is directing that film which is a lengthy process so she might not be able to tour at all next year

Maybe she'll do that over the winter this year and early next i.e. not during outdoor concert season in Europe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Maybe she'll do that over the winter this year and early next i.e. not during outdoor concert season in Europe.

Maybe, her tour this year doesn't end until August. Then she has to do pre production, principal photography, the music and editing and possibly reshoots. She'll also have to do extensive promotion but if she is touring the film would come out after the tour.

The smaller the scale of the film and the lower the budget the film the more likely she will be touring next year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, incident said:

Though in all honesty I'm less and less confident it includes Glastonbury.

Hence why I’m going for glastonbury and her own shows in 2024 and not expecting her to play both.

She is in a completely different place to where she was when she agreed to do Glasto 2020. She’s back to 1989 levels of big, and she really doesn’t need the Glasto boost.

It would be sad but it wouldn’t surprise me if she’s in no rush to come back at all. “I almost headlined glastonbury” at her brits speech… can we read into it too much? Could she be trying to tell us something!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are forgetting that Emily has already said they’ll get her next time she comes to this country, no way she’d have said that publicly if there wasn’t some sort of agreement in place whether formal or informal.

It’s a question of integrity now, does Taylor honour the commitment she has made to the festival and return to play (Macca and Kendrick both did remember). Or does she sack it off to take the massive stadium dollar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thunderstruck said:

Not sure tbh, I think 1975 are much bigger than both of those? Foals are dull as dishwater for me.

Personal preferences aside, if we're talking UK tickets shifted, they definitely are. Played the o2 twice on each of their last 4 tours (including the upcoming one). Biffy have played it twice I think, and Foals zero (Wembley arena/Ally Pally x2 seem to be their biggest capacity gigs) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Florian Saucer Attack said:

The real question is how long ago did Taylor Swift decide to reject her English fans and Glastonbury and tour America instead?

Was this before or after Elton John moved his Paris date? Before or after the Guns N Roses comment?

We will probably never know

She is a BITCH. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

It’s a question of integrity now, does Taylor honour the commitment she has made to the festival and return to play (Macca and Kendrick both did remember). Or does she sack it off to take the massive stadium dollar?

I don't know if you're genuinely posing this as a question but - she takes the dollar. That is the Taylor Swift way.

And I say that as someone who is a fan and is absolutely desperate for her to play, and am still genuinely gutted that it doesn't seem to be in the offing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WestCountryGirl said:

I don't know if you're genuinely posing this as a question but - she takes the dollar. That is the Taylor Swift way.

And I say that as someone who is a fan and is absolutely desperate for her to play, and am still genuinely gutted that it doesn't seem to be in the offing. 

Yes,  probably the best chance I will have to see her is as a Glastonbury headliner, assuming any other gigs would be London based. I live in hope for 2024 .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, WestCountryGirl said:

I don't know if you're genuinely posing this as a question but - she takes the dollar. That is the Taylor Swift way.

And I say that as someone who is a fan and is absolutely desperate for her to play, and am still genuinely gutted that it doesn't seem to be in the offing. 

Even those who are obsessed with the dollar surely see the obvious commercial potential of headlining the biggest festival on earth to a global audience of millions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...