Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

In terms of hard rock headliners, Foo and the lads are widely revered and issue new material on the reg - so are more 'relevant' - but they don't have a fraction of the bangers that GnR have up their sleeves.

This.

GnR are a heritage act, no question, but nobody was asking when Macca/The Stones/The Who/The Cure/Stevie Wonder/Metallica last had a hit.

Booking GnR is no different to any of the above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok:

AM - 20%. Seen them before, so not too bothered. Expect there to be something I'd prefer on another stage.

GnR - 5%. Not really for me, but might hang around for a song or 2 if I'm passing through.

Elton - 90%. Not someone I'd go to see at their own gig, but would defs be up for it at Glasto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the whole "know their songs" metric - I think there's an argument to be made that if you asked everyone on site to name as many songs by the headliners as possible, this year you'd get the most correct answers.

The only ones that would come close are 2011 (Beyonce, U2, Coldplay), 2004 (Macca, Oasis, Muse) and 2000 (Bowie, Travis, Chemical Brothers). Macca and Bowie distorting it quite heavily in those latter two.

Doesn't make them good bookings necessarily but I think they have very wide appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

Depends if BST has sold out by then or not. It's possible they're doing Glasto at a cheaper fee as they know the coverage on TV works as promo for that gig. Which falls apart if they're on late because *that* then becomes the story and people don't both booking BST ("How will I get home if they run late and the tubes aren't running?") and people who are trying to watch live will give up after waiting five minutes.

Don't get me wrong, I agree they don't give a shit about the festival itself or indeed the people in the field, but it going out live on national TV, with their biggest gig with tickets available in the country the following weekend, it's a different picture.

I mean, we'll know if you're right as they'll probably decline the TV footage if they're just doing it for the payday, as the money for that won't be worth the risk if anything goes wrong.

Yeah all fair points, I’m not actually saying they will be late, their history of being late is up and down and they seem to go through stages, it’s not like they’re always late, but sometimes they are. I just have reservations that just because it’s Glastonbury, they’ll treat it any differently to how they treated their Tottenham stadium gigs back in July, I think there are arguments for and against.

FWIW I’m also not against the booking and not arguing the point they could be late for that reason, I just think it’s a possibility that needs to be considered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it’s worth;

AM: 5%, saw them a few times back in their heyday, haven’t listened for years. Only thing to get me there would be a complete lack of other options and my full group frothing at the mouth at the prospect of Pyramid.

GNR: 0%, nope nope nope

Reg: 100%, queer icon, bag load of amazing songs, last opportunity etc. It’s gonna be incredible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

This.

GnR are a heritage act, no question, but nobody was asking when Macca/The Stones/The Who/The Cure/Stevie Wonder/Metallica last had a hit.

Booking GnR is no different to any of the above.

I think in part it's because there's sort of two of those this year with Elton. And no-one can argue that you'd pick GnR over Elton. If it were Taylor, AM, GnR I think people would be much less fussed.

(Notwithstanding the fact Elton has has multiple number one records the last few years and while some are arguably "remixes" Cold Heart at least is different enough to stand alone)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

irrelevant view - 

 

AM - 100% Saw them there headline before and have seen them live elsewhere. Love the music and development of the sound. Bona fide top level contemporary act.

 

GnR - 0% Always hated them and everything about them. They have only got worse and more of a parody. I genuinely turn off the radio should they ever come on when I'm listening.

 

Reg - 75% I think he'd have made a good legends spot. I think hes a bit of an arse, but I get it, and if it goes well it'll be brilliant. Its a knife edge though ...

 

For the love of god Emily - dump GnR and give someone a nudge up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

The three headliners seem to be going over rather well across the socials I’ve seen (granted, not Facebook where most of the whiners seem to congregate). Lots of older people I’m seeing seem pretty stoked about GnR.

Is this Twitter?

I was on reddit and it seemed quite negative

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elton's voice is a million miles ahead of both Macca's and Axl's at this point. I know the Dill Danding thing is funny but if you actually listen to the original version of I'm Still Standing it has all the weird diction in it, just not to quite the same extent. Hadn't realised until I heard it on the radio the other day but puts it in perspective:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AM - 30% ... I'm a fan of them on record but I've seen them before and I don't have any urge to see them again. If there's a tasty run on the Pyramid beforehand and the group consensus is to stay there, I can't see myself putting up too much of a fight. But equally I'd be very surprised if there's nothing that drags me elsewhere. 

 

GNR - 5% ... I can enjoy Welcome to the Jungle and Mr Brownstone I suppose. But yeah, overall not for me. Would much rather be elsewhere and it would have to be a pretty pitiful day for me to consider. And even then, I'll probably just go SEC. 

 

Elton - 90% ... There are a very small handful of acts that could pull me away. Realistically though, I'm not going to be missing this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, chazwwe said:

I'm pretty sure you've posted every other day about how much you think its a bad booking, how stupid the festival is for booking them and how insane people are to even believe they would be booked since November. If you're going to do this until June then I'm out as its boring and derails most conversations. 

then stop trying to suggest they're not a bad booking, and i have nothing to comment against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Neil said:

then stop trying to suggest they're not a bad booking, and i have nothing to comment against.

I've not said that they're not a bad booking or good booking. In all honesty I don't care. Its just boring to see you shut down any conversation. You're literally an old man shouting into a void. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...