Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

govt is just leaking the news to the telegraph,

It's like they're taking all the steps necessary to completely erode trust in the vaccinations :

 

Completely change the gap between the first and the second dose, to an untested one- check! 

Start to declare we'll now chop and change which vaccine you'll get second, depending on what one we can find on the day (again untested!) - check! 

Lie about the number of vaccines available- check! 

Lie about the vaccine administration rate- check! 

Lie about what the hold up is- check! 

 

Edited by Mr.Tease
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

Ah yes a war is exactly what we need right now...

I absolutely agree with him - and I hereby propose that General Farage should gather his troops and lead them into China immediately.

Lead from the front, Nigel. Show them what you're made of. Don't mind all the artillery pointed at you, you're invincible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

It's like they're taking all the steps necessary to completely erode trust in the vaccinations :

 

Completely change the gap between the first and the second dose, to an untested one- check! 

Start to declare we'll now chop and change which vaccine you'll get second, depending on what one we can find on the day (again untested!) - check! 

Lie about the number of vaccines available- check! 

Lie about the vaccine administration rate- check! 

Lie about what the hold up is- check! 

 

Yeah I raised this the other day when the idea of delaying the second shot was first raised.

One of the most important things the Government can do is to not let politics interfere in the medical aspects of the rollout as they can't afford to have significant distrust develop.

Delay the second shot of the Oxford vaccine, if there's the data available to support it? Fine, though we've not seen the data yet and probably won't for ~2 weeks when the Public Assessment Report is published.

Doing anything untested beyond that? Fucking irresponsible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

It's like they're taking all the steps necessary to completely erode trust in the vaccinations :

 

Completely change the gap between the first and the second dose, to an untested one- check! 

Start to declare we'll now chop and change which vaccine you'll get second, depending on what one we can find on the day (again untested!) - check! 

Lie about the number of vaccines available- check! 

Lie about the vaccine administration rate- check! 

Lie about what the hold up is- check! 

 

Fwiw the second dose being different is only supposed to be 'in unusual circumstances ' from the reading of the rules. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, incident said:

Yeah I raised this the other day when the idea of delaying the second shot was first raised.

One of the most important things the Government can do is to not let politics interfere in the medical aspects of the rollout as they can't afford to have significant distrust develop.

Delay the second shot of the Oxford vaccine, if there's the data available to support it? Fine, though we've not seen the data yet and probably won't for ~2 weeks when the Public Assessment Report is published.

Doing anything untested beyond that? Fucking irresponsible.

I think they're making the right call with delaying both. Even those who have already had shot 1 being rescheduled frees up about 1 million extra doses in the short term. I'm not going to post "that graph" again, but the Pfizer vaccine is already highly effective a week before dose 2. They're going to save lives by making this change, what with the new variant, we have to balance the risk carefully and it's more likely to kill people by not increasing the delay for both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all such a mess isn't it? We're just sat here allowing this new strain to spread everywhere in the country. It WILL spread to the levels in london and SE, schools WILL facilitate this and the rest of the country WILL have no health service just like London won't in a few days. 

This isn't in doubt - and the only time action will be taken is when it does happen. 

It's as if they want the rest of the country to share London's pain. It's all inevitable and the measures need to be harsh and it needs to be now. 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I think they're making the right call with delaying both. Even those who have already had shot 1 being rescheduled frees up about 1 million extra doses in the short term. I'm not going to post "that graph" again, but the Pfizer vaccine is already highly effective a week before dose 2. They're going to save lives by making this change, what with the new variant, we have to balance the risk carefully and it's more likely to kill people by not increasing the delay for both.

But mixing and matching (granted, not as the default option but even potentially) is yet another step on from that and completely untested in all possible ways.

I mean fuck, if they're going to do that then they might as well decide that the doses need to be rationed further and everyone gets a half dose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, incident said:

But mixing and matching (granted, not as the default option but even potentially) is yet another step on from that and completely untested in all possible ways.

I mean fuck, if they're going to do that then they might as well decide that the doses need to be rationed further and everyone gets a half dose.

Yeah the mixing is crazy. Hopefully it won't have to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr.Tease said:

It's like they're taking all the steps necessary to completely erode trust in the vaccinations :

 

Completely change the gap between the first and the second dose, to an untested one- check! 

Start to declare we'll now chop and change which vaccine you'll get second, depending on what one we can find on the day (again untested!) - check! 

Lie about the number of vaccines available- check! 

Lie about the vaccine administration rate- check! 

Lie about what the hold up is- check! 

 

Yeah I agree. This shit is just going to erode trust more - and I say this as someone who fully believes they are safe and can't wait to have one. I'm not keen on them going against the published scientific guidance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

This stuff is so new we don't have the first notion of any long term effects of it - it's simply not been around long enough to test the theory. 

With all these things now it's there I'm sure there will be hundreds of studies by academics all around the world into the various impact this vaccine and indeed the illness itself has on things like fertility and all manner of other things. 

I'm just not to keen on being the test pilot.

 

I get that, I really do, and I think some people are being a bit harsh. But reality is we won’t manage to eradicate COVID, so unless you plan on staying isolated the rest of your life, your choices will boil down to either getting the vaccine, or getting COVID and getting natural immunity.

And here’s the thing: there’s also no long term evidence about what COVID does. Even in those who get a light or asymptomatic infection. You are right that it’s possible the vaccine could reduce fertility. It’s also possible catching COVID could reduce fertility. We don’t know that yet either.

for every unknown with the vaccine, there’s another with the actual disease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DeanoL said:

I get that, I really do, and I think some people are being a bit harsh. But reality is we won’t manage to eradicate COVID, so unless you plan on staying isolated the rest of your life, your choices will boil down to either getting the vaccine, or getting COVID and getting natural immunity.

And here’s the thing: there’s also no long term evidence about what COVID does. Even in those who get a light or asymptomatic infection. You are right that it’s possible the vaccine could reduce fertility. It’s also possible catching COVID could reduce fertility. We don’t know that yet either.

for every unknown with the vaccine, there’s another with the actual disease.

i_just_dont_trust_them.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DeanoL said:

I get that, I really do, and I think some people are being a bit harsh. But reality is we won’t manage to eradicate COVID, so unless you plan on staying isolated the rest of your life, your choices will boil down to either getting the vaccine, or getting COVID and getting natural immunity.

And here’s the thing: there’s also no long term evidence about what COVID does. Even in those who get a light or asymptomatic infection. You are right that it’s possible the vaccine could reduce fertility. It’s also possible catching COVID could reduce fertility. We don’t know that yet either.

for every unknown with the vaccine, there’s another with the actual disease.

Very good points.  Not getting vaccinated means getting Covid at some stage. Absurd to assume that the latter will lead to better outcomes including on fertility.

Here's a very good thread from an immunologist on why the vaccine doesn't damage female fertility.

Make your own decisions based on practically zero understanding...or the reasoning of a specialist in the area - up to you. 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1339510379332988929.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the decision has been made because ultimately the one dose method will save more lives, due to the immunity it provides within the first two weeks. So it makes most sense to have this rolled out to as many individuals as possible, as soon as possible  

Although this might not be the recommended route and the 2nd dose sooner would certainly bump the immunity up even further, we have to address the circumstances we are dealing with. The key thing to remember is you are much, much more likely to beat this virus if you only ever had the one dose vs none at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hospital full, patients waiting in ambulances to be admitted & key frontline staff nursing covid patients being told they will not receive the vaccination until at least 2 more weeks have passed, that's the reality of the situation. Hancock was wise enough not to over promise but his boss just can't help himself.

Edited by Lycra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...