Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Shows how hard this kind of science is. The fate of the entire world depends on the key question of whether asymptomatic carriers can spread the virus. And we're apparently still releasing large studies that are contradicting each other.

I thought this was settled already - in the opposite way to this study.

I thought the smart money was that genuine asymptomatic carriers don’t spread much, but those who are 24-48 hours away from getting symptoms (presymptomatics) are highly contagious 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

I thought the smart money was that genuine asymptomatic carriers don’t spread much, but those who are 24-48 hours away from getting symptoms (presymptomatics) are highly contagious 

I was a bit imprecise in my language, including presymptomatics in "asymptomatic". But the point stands, the situation as you described appears to be quite different to the abstract screenshotted by Vine of a large study. This shit it hard!

What says our resident expert? @Toilet Duck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I was a bit imprecise in my language, including presymptomatics in "asymptomatic". But the point stands, the situation as you described appears to be quite different to the abstract screenshotted by Vine of a large study. This shit it hard!

What says our resident expert? @Toilet Duck

Transmission dynamics in Wuhan have given us some insight previously and this adds to it. Early on in the outbreak, they looked at close contacts of symptomatic cases and concluded that somewhere between 2-6% ended up getting infected. Since then, it’s become abundantly clear that a small number of people drive the majority of infections, the so called super-spreaders. The problem is, we have no clear idea what defines a super-spreader yet! (We’ve discussed this before and the closest we’ve got is a mixture of biology, behaviour and environment...doesn’t narrow it down much!). If even symptomatic people aren’t necessarily going to pass on the infection, then it becomes extremely difficult to pin down. So, we end up telling everyone that is positive to isolate, and their close contacts to do the same. It’s a safety first approach, but not ideal, however until we have the technology to say for sure (or with a high degree of confidence) that you aren’t infectious, we’re kinda stuck with it. I do think the antigen tests, used regularly are the way out of long self-isolation and while not perfect, are good enough. In terms of definitely stating that asymptomatic individuals are definitely not infectious, I still don’t think we have a clear answer on that unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

 

Why are they only finalising these plans now? They should have had plans for all sorts of exits in place when we went into lockdown.

4 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

Will the new tier system be as harsh as lockdown though?

Probably not in some of the tiers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

it's all press briefings...Bojo going to outline the plan on Monday.

They are discussing in a Cabinet meeting tomorrow which indicates they haven’t finalised plans yet which is my point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Ministers are seeking to identify 'morale boosting' measures such as allowing people to watch live sport again or reopening cinemas. 'That is an important element to consider,' a Government source said. '[Paving a way to] allowing people to see the latest Bond film in the cinema would send a big signal that normality has returned.' 

A Government source said: 'Businesses such as beauty salons are dying to open and have made themselves Covid safe. People want to get their nails done before Christmas – it's a huge season for these businesses."

I hate the Government's focus on the trivial...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, xxialac said:

"Ministers are seeking to identify 'morale boosting' measures such as allowing people to watch live sport again or reopening cinemas. 'That is an important element to consider,' a Government source said. '[Paving a way to] allowing people to see the latest Bond film in the cinema would send a big signal that normality has returned.' 

A Government source said: 'Businesses such as beauty salons are dying to open and have made themselves Covid safe. People want to get their nails done before Christmas – it's a huge season for these businesses."

I hate the Government's focus on the trivial...

 

Bond is due at Easter now... A sensible government would plan for gradual openings in spring. This lot, however, are looking like they are going to undo so much hard work and sacrifice - when we are so close - just so The Sun can use their ‘Bo Jo Ho - Boris saves Christmas’ headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

Bond is due at Easter now... A sensible government would plan for gradual openings in spring. This lot, however, are looking like they are going to undo so much hard work and sacrifice - when we are so close - just so The Sun can use their ‘Bo Jo Ho - Boris saves Christmas’ headline.

Totally. Boneheads, the lot of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest moral booster they could do would be to lay out a detailed timeline recognising the factors that could effect that timeline and how they'd effect the timeline. I think everyone understands that unexpected things come up but the fact that we're hearing what the plan is a week before we're coming out of lockdown is ludicrous - how are businesses meant to prepare?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

I for one can't wait to find out the leaked plans tomorrow night via a Sky News tweet and then a bat signal at 3:30am Monday morning 

Ha - I fully expect we'll find out the vaccine news from a series of escape room clues and the real vaccine will be the friends we made along the way...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, xxialac said:

"Ministers are seeking to identify 'morale boosting' measures such as allowing people to watch live sport again or reopening cinemas. 'That is an important element to consider,' a Government source said. '[Paving a way to] allowing people to see the latest Bond film in the cinema would send a big signal that normality has returned.' 

A Government source said: 'Businesses such as beauty salons are dying to open and have made themselves Covid safe. People want to get their nails done before Christmas – it's a huge season for these businesses."

I hate the Government's focus on the trivial...

 

'Dying to open' or 'Open for dying'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, xxialac said:

"Ministers are seeking to identify 'morale boosting' measures such as allowing people to watch live sport again or reopening cinemas. 'That is an important element to consider,' a Government source said. '[Paving a way to] allowing people to see the latest Bond film in the cinema would send a big signal that normality has returned.' 

A Government source said: 'Businesses such as beauty salons are dying to open and have made themselves Covid safe. People want to get their nails done before Christmas – it's a huge season for these businesses."

I hate the Government's focus on the trivial...

 

Morale boosting for me would be a competent government with a clear, laid out plan for the winter months ahead that focuses on saving as many lives as possible and safe guarding the NHS for as many non-COVID treatments as possible. Not one that chases headlines, wastes opportunities and ignores warnings.

Edited by Ozanne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
14 hours ago, JoeyT said:

This is true to an extent if you are talking about exercising as a generic thing but there are activities that sit within it such as swimming that can’t be done at home.

It’s easy to say go out for a run but something like swimming which is non weight bearing is what some have to do by necessity due to injuries for instance.

I’m not bothered massively by gyms closing because I have been able to purchase my own equipment and can go outside to run but not everyone is in the same boat.

and the pub social can't be done at home, but pubs are still shut.

There's a million different ways to exercise in and outside the house, and just about anyone should have enough imagination to think of ways to cover a few short weeks.

The point isn't to find an angle to keep something open, it's about removing the chances for one person to infect another. Which happens when any two people share the same space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

 

11 hours ago, Mark E. Spliff said:

I agree that Zionism and the Israeli govt are two separate things - one's an ideology, the other's the Government.  I've never claimed the two are the same.  I've been attacking both of them on here, but for different reasons: the former for being irrational

what's irrational about the idea of 'a people' having a place to collectively call home?

Why do you think specifically the Jews are not permitted the same as other peoples?

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
8 hours ago, topmarksbri said:

The biggest moral booster they could do would be to lay out a detailed timeline recognising the factors that could effect that timeline and how they'd effect the timeline. I think everyone understands that unexpected things come up but the fact that we're hearing what the plan is a week before we're coming out of lockdown is ludicrous - how are businesses meant to prepare?

THIS ^^^^^ :) 

They could, for example, say "outdoor live music will be able to resume on 1st May (subject to the NHS situation in May)".

I wouldn't expect them to do that until the vaccine has started being rolled out, so that the start date they come up with is based on the specifics of vaccination, but the govt should be in that position no later than the end of January.

 

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...