Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Tickets , Tips and Tricks


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, parsonjack said:

This is the point I made earlier somewhere...I think the whole statement regarding registrations being locked is badly written and very misleading.  IMO it's simply saying that when registrations are entered they are then locked for use in that booking session for 10 minutes to give time for the transaction to be completed.  Its not there as any sort of penalty, its simply to ensure the system is efficient as it can be by avoiding the potential for simultaneous transactions against the same reg number. 

I agree,a penalty makes no sense and isn't 'reasonable'. As the erroneous reg numbers would not match the postcode I would also expect no lockout, just an error message.

Edited by HalfAnIdiot
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HalfAnIdiot said:

I agree,a penalty makes no sense and isn't 'reasonable'. As the erroneous reg numbers would not make the postcode I would also expect no lockout, just an error message.

Yep pretty sure if the Reg and Postcode don't match you just get an error saying a 'Registration could not be found against the postcode' or summat similar. 

If they wish to lock that Reg then go ahead....it ain't mine ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I agree with this. if you get the reg number wrong, how can they lock it? Do they lock the wrong one you entered? Or do they lock another number, and if so, which number? all the numbers that are similar to the wrong one? Ones with the same digits but in a different order? It seems sort of impossible to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've no great knowledge of load balancers and ddos protection or similar systems but I'm thinking it is potentially possible for such systems to look out for, identify and block automated page refreshes. The period between refreshes would be much more consistent if driven by code rather than human.

Thoughts anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HalfAnIdiot said:

I've no great knowledge of load balancers and ddos protection or similar systems but I'm thinking it is potentially possible for such systems to look out for, identify and block automated page refreshes. The period between refreshes would be much more consistent if driven by code rather than human.

Thoughts anyone?

I’ve had this thought also, the requests will be consistently be coming exactly every 2.00 seconds. I’d imagine it’s possible to identify and block this. Who knows if they would go to those lengths though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, HalfAnIdiot said:

I've no great knowledge of load balancers and ddos protection or similar systems but I'm thinking it is potentially possible for such systems to look out for, identify and block automated page refreshes. The period between refreshes would be much more consistent if driven by code rather than human.

Thoughts anyone?

Years ago the system used a filter that throttled repeated connection attempts (from constant refreshing). They may or may not use that now tho they seem to infer that they do with the latest news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Little worried - checked through the internet firewall logs and there's at least 30 people at work that have visited Glastonbury related pages in the last week or so. As the internet pipe is a single external-IP if anywhere near that many are attempting to use the internet at work to get tickets then the 1 second refresh limit from 1 source IP will be easily exceeded (as all traffic is routed through a Cisco Ironport appliance).

Think I'll go home early tomorrow just in case it DDOS blocks all the people at work and VPN back into work on my old laptop so I have two routes into seetickets instead. Although if that was the case anyone at UNI or any other major company would have the same problem.

Just finished running "windows Update" on both PC's so system performance should be optimal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gordong said:

I’ve had this thought also, the requests will be consistently be coming exactly every 2.00 seconds. I’d imagine it’s possible to identify and block this. Who knows if they would go to those lengths though. 

Already thought of that

    'As long as the holding page is there keep refreshing randomly every 1.5 to 3 seconds
    While bot.URL = "https://glastonbury.seetickets.com/content/extras"
        bot.Refresh
        Randomize
        randN = Int((3000 - 1500 + 1) * Rnd + 1500)
        bot.Wait randN
    Wend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jmansel said:

Just a quick question which I don't think has been covered, apologies if it has - do we need to include titles before the names (Mr/Mrs) when we get to the registration entry? Just want to make sure I'm fully ready!

Good luck everyone! 

No, you don't enter names at all when entering the reg. numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jmansel said:

Just a quick question which I don't think has been covered, apologies if it has - do we need to include titles before the names (Mr/Mrs) when we get to the registration entry? Just want to make sure I'm fully ready!

Good luck everyone! 

no names needed it auto populates those .... just registration numbers and postcodes 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jmansel said:

Just a quick question which I don't think has been covered, apologies if it has - do we need to include titles before the names (Mr/Mrs) when we get to the registration entry? Just want to make sure I'm fully ready!

Good luck everyone! 

Don't think it ever asks for names, just reg number and postcode then it shows you the persons name and you have to press confirm if it is the right person

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Penrhos said:

Little worried - checked through the internet firewall logs and there's at least 30 people at work that have visited Glastonbury related pages in the last week or so. As the internet pipe is a single external-IP if anywhere near that many are attempting to use the internet at work to get tickets then the 1 second refresh limit from 1 source IP will be easily exceeded (as all traffic is routed through a Cisco Ironport appliance).

Think I'll go home early tomorrow just in case it DDOS blocks all the people at work and VPN back into work on my old laptop so I have two routes into seetickets instead. Although if that was the case anyone at UNI or any other major company would have the same problem.

Just finished running "windows Update" on both PC's so system performance should be optimal.

would they be trying on a Sunday though?

if you've admin access to your FW I'm sure you could sneek a couple of rules in there to block access (then delete your FW logs, LDAP/ AD logs, local PC logs, door access logs, camera logs - simple!! (assuming no syncing is done to your DR site!! ) )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're a 24/7 operation - but 90% of staff in at weekends have heavily restricted internet access due to working in the call centre.

So Coach sale will be iffy - but Sunday sale it should be all systems go (but I'm hoping to be sorted by then as I don't like driving back Monday).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Alkaline Trio 90 Barrington Levy 80 Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 100 Billy Ocean 100 The Black Keys 80 Carl Cox 100 Chase & Status 120 Chelsea Wolfe 80 CMAT 135  Confidence Man 150 MAX David Byrne 150 Disclosure 60 Everything Everything 110 Faithless 80 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130 Garbage 100 GOAT 105 Greentea Peng 120 Happy Mondays 70 Hollie Cook 90 Jorja Smith 100 José González 100 Joy Crookes 120 Judas Priest 70 Kasabian 80 Kneecap 115 Levellers 85 Limp Bizkit 10 Linkin Park 90 Lorde 120 Madness 75 The Maccabees 100 Neck Deep 135 Nile Rodgers & Chic 100 Overmono 100 Pixies 25 The Prodigy 140 Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 100 Ren 50 Richard Ashcroft 100 Say She She 75 Scissor Sisters 120 Self Esteem 120 Skunk Anansie 100 Stereolab 120 The Streets 110 Super Furry Animals 110 Tems 20 Thundercat 90 Tom Jones 50 Tyler, the Creator 60 Underworld 115 Wet Leg 90 Wilco 75 (-10) The Wombats 80 Wolf Alice 140
    • We head out in the morning. Couple of nights in New York then up to Boston. Enjoy the games lads and hopefully we get some great football to take our minds off the whole shitshow off the pitch.
    • White Stripes/QotSA at Harewood 2007, Tramlines (and Blue Dot, same weekend) in '23, and Elbow at Jodrell Bank '13. 
    • Yeah exactly, the shock moments, group layouts, etc all end up playing out differently once you get into the tournament. However you tweak it, you don't predict shocks.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...