Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

TBAs 2019


Tuna

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, kevbizarre said:

Saw Confidence Man last night and they were incredible. Would have been a great addition - still hoping they may somehow appear in a secret slot maybe John Peel!

Just come back from seeing them in Bristol; brilliant fun. Why the fuck have they not been booked? A criminal oversight given that A) They're touring the UK the week before and B ) Even the fucking wombats can get a slot on the other.

Edited by zero000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kevbizarre said:

Saw Confidence Man last night and they were incredible. Would have been a great addition - still hoping they may somehow appear in a secret slot maybe John Peel!

They’ve responded personally to a pal of mine indicating that, sadly, they’re not at the Farm this year. Shame - they were such a lot of fun in 2017. 

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, kevbizarre said:

Saw Confidence Man last night and they were incredible. Would have been a great addition - still hoping they may somehow appear in a secret slot maybe John Peel!

Confidence Man are bloody bonkers and brilliant. A performance on one of the main stages and maybe some BBC coverage would really catapult them. I’m surprised they’re not bigger than they are.

Let’s hope we see them at some point!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, james130 said:

Me neither. But I'm just trying to rationalise why he would go from the poster announcement to a TBA, if he's almost 100% confirmed for that slot.

Yeah, you make a good point m80. And the more I think about it the more I realise Sia is huge and probably quite a big pull? Not heard the LSD thing but I guess JP is small enough that they could fill it quite well! Chems have played before and Killers are, imo, not main stage headliners so they'll probs do quite well. Would be wicked if Diplo popped up at Ronson's 5 hour DJ set! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bennyhana22 said:

They’ve responded personally to a pal of mine indicating that, sadly, they’re not at the Farm this year. Shame - they were such a lot of fun in 2017. 

Ben

But they would* say that, wouldn't they?  I mean, if they're only playing a secret set.

 

*No they wouldn't, they'd say nothing, but a man can dream can't he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Brave Sir Robin said:

They'd be perfect for Thursday WG.

Well they wouldn't, as we wouldn't be able to get anywhere near it, but you know what I mean.

They're a bit of a forum favourite though, this popularity isn't reflected in the outside world in terms of their streaming numbers, venues and simple awareness (the last one is anecdotal, granted). They're way smaller than many of the acts that have played WG over the last few years. It'd still be fairly busy though I guess, full of efesters.

Edited by The Martini Police
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, zeppelin said:

You may not like them but I think you've got this one wrong, champ. 

It's not a case of not liking them, they're not particularly current in any conventional sense, nor are they revered enough to be a heritage act. They sort of occupy this weird middle ground between not quite being has beens but not quite being flavour of the month. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WStoner said:

It's not a case of not liking them, they're not particularly current in any conventional sense, nor are they revered enough to be a heritage act. They sort of occupy this weird middle ground between not quite being has beens but not quite being flavour of the month. 

I’m still very much of the opinion that they never would’ve been booked to headline if the original headliner (McCartney) hadn’t bailed/we weren’t in a seemingly dead year for festival headliners. They’re definitely still headliner size, and will pull a huge crowd, but stick out as an odd booking for Glastonbury who is known for booking the biggest or most hyped headliners of the time, neither of which The Killers are (see also: The Cure). Just the way things went this year,  and top billings at other festivals worldwide have shown a pattern of a lack of real killer (no pun intended) headliners. 

1 minute ago, Roger1 said:

This is wishful thinking but what are the chances of Biffy showing up somewhere? Now IOW is done cant see any reason to stop them playing if they wanted to.

Subbed in 2017 so don’t see them coming back so soon. Doesn’t really seem to be anywhere for them to fit anyway considering Foals are all but certain to be the Park TBA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FloorFiller said:

I’m still very much of the opinion that they never would’ve been booked to headline if the original headliner (McCartney) hadn’t bailed/we weren’t in a seemingly dead year for festival headliners. They’re definitely still headliner size, and will pull a huge crowd, but stick out as an odd booking for Glastonbury who is known for booking the biggest or most hyped headliners of the time, neither of which The Killers are (see also: The Cure). Just the way things went this year,  and top billings at other festivals worldwide have shown a pattern of a lack of real killer (no pun intended) headliners. 

Yeah this pretty much sums it up. 100% headliner if booked though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Roger1 said:

This is wishful thinking but what are the chances of Biffy showing up somewhere? Now IOW is done cant see any reason to stop them playing if they wanted to.

Zero. They played last festival 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, august1 said:

So the most 'solid' info on foals was from the same source as it's nailed on for Diplo..

Neil had info that Foals are playing on the Saturday (and that was before the lineup was announced)

Anyone sensible knew it wasn’t Diplo, why on earth would he have been on the poster and kept as a TBA.

Its still all good for Foals being there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, zero000 said:

Just come back from seeing them in Bristol; brilliant fun. Why the fuck have they not been booked? A criminal oversight given that A) They're touring the UK the week before and B ) Even the fucking wombats can get a slot on the other.

Spot on about the wombats.

Seem to be there every year, yet utterly shite. V mysterious.

 

Sean Paul? Nah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jamesthedrake said:

Diplo could still rock up for this I guess. Sean Paul has guested on a few Major Lazer tracks.

Given we're pretty sure Diplo pulled out very late in the day it'd be even weirder if he turned up for this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, august1 said:

So the most 'solid' info on foals was from the same source as it's nailed on for Diplo..

Pretty sure that was one of those occasions where the ITK person’s info had originally come from the rumours on here, or the same initial source at least.

Edited by Bradders
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bradders said:

Pretty sure that was one of those occasions where the ITK person’s info had originally come from the rumours on here, or the same initial source at least.

I think it was unlikely to have someone in the loop on foals and Diplo or the park and JP stage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...