Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Glastocam!


pauladam

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Smeble said:

Not sure posting screenshots of peoples living accommodation is a great idea, ok there’s no detail, but it is a bit of an invasion of privacy.

 

Booo

It’s GFL/BBC doing it anyway, not us. I’ll buy them a drink in June to make up for it if the residents make themselves known to me. 
 

Edit: what about my privacy when they live broadcast me sleeping in a tent in 2019? 

Edited by blutarsky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, blutarsky said:

Booo

It’s GFL/BBC doing it anyway, not us. I’ll buy them a drink in June to make up for it if the residents make themselves known to me. 
 

Edit: what about my privacy when they live broadcast me sleeping in a tent in 2019? 

Being 1 in a sea of thousands on a webcam is a very different thing to being a few guys in a portacabin having zoomed in screenshots posted on a forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Smeble said:

Being 1 in a sea of thousands on a webcam is a very different thing to being a few guys in a portacabin having zoomed in screenshots posted on a forum.

Think you're looking for a problem that isn't there to be honest.

Even zoomed in, the resolution isn't going to be problematic - you can't make out faces, or car licence plates, or really anything else identifiable about them.

The most you can do is tell whether the lights in the cabins are on or not, or whether the doors and/or window shutters are open or not. Even if the doors and windows are wide open, you're not going to be able to make out anything going on inside.

An average city centre web cam probably accounts more inadvertent privacy violations ever day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Smeble said:

Not sure posting screenshots of peoples living accommodation is a great idea, ok there’s no detail, but it is a bit of an invasion of privacy.

 

You do realise this is a public webcam, visible to anyone on earth with internet access ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, incident said:

Think you're looking for a problem that isn't there to be honest.

Even zoomed in, the resolution isn't going to be problematic - you can't make out faces, or car licence plates, or really anything else identifiable about them.

The most you can do is tell whether the lights in the cabins are on or not, or whether the doors and/or window shutters are open or not. Even if the doors and windows are wide open, you're not going to be able to make out anything going on inside.

An average city centre web cam probably accounts more inadvertent privacy violations ever day.

 those city centre webcams aren’t them posted on an Internet forum though are they. I guess nobody cares about invasions of privacy until it’s their own🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, paulshane said:

You do realise this is a public webcam, visible to anyone on earth with internet access ?

You do realise that actually goes for my argument not against it right?

also there’s a huge difference between being in the distance on a webcam making occasional passes and zoomed in images posted on a forum?

staggered by the lack of ‘giving a fuck’ on here.

guess everyone would be happy with a 24h webcam pointed at their house.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Smeble said:

You do realise that actually goes for my argument not against it right?

also there’s a huge difference between being in the distance on a webcam making occasional passes and zoomed in images posted on a forum?

staggered by the lack of ‘giving a fuck’ on here.

guess everyone would be happy with a 24h webcam pointed at their house.

 

If it was from a mile away and my head was one pixel I couldn’t give a shit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Smeble said:

You do realise that actually goes for my argument not against it right?

also there’s a huge difference between being in the distance on a webcam making occasional passes and zoomed in images posted on a forum?

staggered by the lack of ‘giving a fuck’ on here.

guess everyone would be happy with a 24h webcam pointed at their house.

 

You are really going to lose your shit when you hear about Google street view. 
 

I posted a few pictures, you can’t make out the people or the company they work for. Just that the lights are on and they have moved it. This post is about events on the cam, and this was (might not be the beat one) the first confirmed people staying on the farm as part of the build. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Smeble said:

Not sure posting screenshots of peoples living accommodation is a great idea, ok there’s no detail, but it is a bit of an invasion of privacy.

 

Eh? 

Am I looking at the same thing? I can’t even see if there are cows or humans in there. And I definitely can’t see what they are doing! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Smeble said:

You do realise that actually goes for my argument not against it right?

also there’s a huge difference between being in the distance on a webcam making occasional passes and zoomed in images posted on a forum?

staggered by the lack of ‘giving a fuck’ on here.

guess everyone would be happy with a 24h webcam pointed at their house.

 

Is this a wind up ??? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Dukeicon said:

Vehicles up at the Glastonbury-on-Sea area this morning.

124755407_Screenshot2022-04-12at09_23_09.png.8e8d6e355e57dcf778eb8dc26d76b87d.png

Pilton Dogging Club - please respect their privacy 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Alkaline Trio 90 Barrington Levy 80 Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 100 Billy Ocean 100 The Black Keys 70  Carl Cox 100 Chase & Status 120 Chelsea Wolfe 80 CMAT 135  Confidence Man 150 MAX David Byrne 150 Disclosure 60 Everything Everything 110 Faithless 90 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130 Garbage 100 GOAT 105 Greentea Peng 120 Happy Mondays 70 Hollie Cook 90 Jorja Smith 100 José González 100 Joy Crookes 120 Judas Priest 70 Kasabian 60 Kneecap 120  Levellers 85 Linkin Park 90 Lorde 120 Madness 75 The Maccabees 100 Neck Deep 135 Nile Rodgers & Chic 100 Overmono 100 Pixies 15 The Prodigy 140 Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 100 Ren 45  Richard Ashcroft 100 Say She She 75 Scissor Sisters 120 Self Esteem 120 Skunk Anansie 100 Stereolab 120 The Streets 110 Super Furry Animals 110 Tems 10 Thundercat 90 Tom Jones 40  Tyler, the Creator 60 Underworld 115 Wet Leg 90 Wilco 75 (-10) The Wombats 80 Wolf Alice 140
    • A question has crossed my (questionable) mind;   Has the size of the Green Fields remained the same as other areas have expanded / been added on to, since say, 2014 (the last time that I attended)? Are they 'lost' within, or well attended?    That's actually two questions. The second one just slipped in at the end by taking advantage of my lack of means to stop it.    
    • I'd say the same about Kylie.    Annie would be awesome, Duran not so much, and on the issue of them wanting a beanie slot, that probably rules out a fair few others who I think would fit the bill very well... and are legitimately more entitled to a headline, and/or too expensive.   Was just about to suggest Chaka Khan, but see @Gnomicide has beat me to it!    What about someone like Bryan Ferry?
    • It's certainly gone more that way, but then they went completely in the opposite direction and had Cat Stevens.
    • Chaka can, or Chaka can't?  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...