Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Primalcrux said:

Tbh I didnt like Arcade Fire at all :p, not my thing

Youre right tho that most of the crowd seemed to be having a great time!

That was kind of my point. There are quite a lot of people who don't like the band at all, but those who do like them, like them a lot!

Edited by stuartbert two hats
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Though I'm really talking about pre-event expectations based on the context of the performance, having been at the gig in question I found it uneven.

I'm a huge AF fan but I have to admit to being a little let down by their performance. I mean, it was alright, but I was expecting something spectacular. 

Their Leeds headline show was better IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arcade Fire was fairly shit, not just average, but fairly shit. Really boring for long long parts of the gig. And as empty as I've seen for a headliner, apart from Metallica. 

Whatever about the three headliners this year, the field will be busy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hugh Jass said:

I'm a huge AF fan but I have to admit to being a little let down by their performance. I mean, it was alright, but I was expecting something spectacular. 

Their Leeds headline show was better IMO.

Really enjoyed that Leeds set but since then I've they have not been the same for me as find them too shouty (we went to see metronomy in 2014 best decision ever :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

surprised by all of this - Arcade Fire was one of my favourite ever sets at Glastonbury. granted i was right down front and absolutely off my nut so that may have had a huge part in it, but i left with a ginormous smile on my face. a shame that they headlined off the back of Reflektor which has been my least favourite of their albums thus far, but the carnival feel of the show was awesome on the Pyramid. here's hoping they're invited back somewhere down the line (although i'm sure it won't be for a long while)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very much with FloorFiller, I was right at the front and having a very drunken party with a number of my mates so I'm not sure if I would have felt differently if I was sober and on my on, but I thought Arcade Fire were absolutely amazing, the carnival style was awesome. I don't really know much about them but it was a proper highlight for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arcade Fire we awesome, we were quite a way back and loved every minute of it, but I'm a fan so....

Nothing will top Arctic Monkeys headline set in 2013 though, nothing....although i was in a slightly altered state

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thought Arcade Fire were brilliant from where I was at towards the back of the pit area...and it was telling that one of them said to us as they left "in a career of many highlights, this was probably THE highlight" (wasn't sure if it was Win who said that so didn't want to directly claim it was him, lest i be corrected) as it seemed like they were trying to play down the significance of a Glastonbury headline set prior to gig

4/4 for me on the Pyramid sets i caught that day, all great, War on Drugs, Rods y Gabs, Elbow and then AF. a great Friday overall w/ Courtney Barnett at the Park playing what seems to have been the best of the sets vs. the other 3 she's played since that one, based on the feedback i've read on here.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, snorton82 said:

Arcade Fire we awesome, we were quite a way back and loved every minute of it, but I'm a fan so....

Nothing will top Arctic Monkeys headline set in 2013 though, nothing....although i was in a slightly altered state

most on here will assure you that AM set could only at best, be 3rd best thing that was going on at that immediate time on the farm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, tevaburger said:

most on here will assure you that AM set could only at best, be 3rd best thing that was going on at that immediate time on the farm.

haha I'm not having that, it was an epic set! That was the best year for me, easily....obviously the Stones played a big part in that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, snorton82 said:

Arcade Fire we awesome, we were quite a way back and loved every minute of it, but I'm a fan so....

Nothing will top Arctic Monkeys headline set in 2013 though, nothing....although i was in a slightly altered state

That Arctics set was dull, i'm not sure how but everyone around me seemed a little bored by halfway through. It wasn't as bad as their Reading 2009 show, but it definitely feel short of when I saw them tour suck it and see and humbug. Perhaps festivals aren't the right audience for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, reflekting said:

That Arctics set was dull, i'm not sure how but everyone around me seemed a little bored by halfway through. It wasn't as bad as their Reading 2009 show, but it definitely feel short of when I saw them tour suck it and see and humbug. Perhaps festivals aren't the right audience for them. 

They should be the right audience for them. They're one of the only acts I can think of who could play R&L and have 90% of the crowd know every word. But they just seem to suck live now. They were naff when I caught them on the arena tour in 2013, although really good at Don Valley Bowl in 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arctic Monkeys were brilliant in 2013. Great setlist and great performance. I've watched it back a lot of times and it comes across just as good on TV as well, the crowd are very loud as well. I don't understand the negativity I have seen on here for that set from a few people. I have seen them 3 times, and that was the best. Seen them on the Humbug tour in Newcastle the first time and it was terrible, so bad that I said I would never bother seeing them again. I only seen them at TITP 2011 because they were the most appealing thing that night so I gave them another chance, and they were great then. 

Edited by Alan_C
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...