Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

Even as a Prince fan I wouldn't disagree with this. Lovesexy itself isn't *bad*, but it was probably the end of his run of consistently great albums in the 80's

You could certainly count it as the start of his decline in some ways, but I see it as his last really genius album. I had a shoddy tape copy of the black album, which was the record he'd hoped to put out and Lovesexy is a million times better than that, which his record company were right in saying would have killed his career in one fell swoop.

To say that Prince was some sort of Smash hits artist is pure revisionism. He was certainly pop and he might have been in the mainstream in the early to mid 80s, but he was always a little leftfield, particularly from the late 80s onwards. Judging an artist like Prince on the basis of singles is a big mistake, like judging Pink Floyd on only ever hearing another brick in the wall and comfortably numb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who knows anything about these add-ons that monitor changes on a website? I've just had a second alert today that there's been a change on the lineup page.

Nearly had a heart attack - but again, nothing has changed!

Am I being stupidly optimistic if I tell myself it's because they're doing wonderful things behind the scenes, ready for an announcement? (or have I simply broken the internet?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New National song sounds like a b-side from the last album to promote worldwide release of the film.

Never mind.

:'(

Yeah I wasn't expecting a new album or anything as it's too soon since Trouble Will Find Me for that so releasing it to promote the film makes a bit more sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

We have an update from the journalists at Crossways North Wooton!

Crossways North Wootton we are also still awaiting the news on the line up & disappointed it still hasn't been announced yet!

Perhaps Michael and his widfe didn't talk about the line-up enough while they were in the pub, are still talking about it now, and we'll only get an announcement when they've stopped talking about the line-up? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and Michael is of course going around telling everyone he meets what the line-up is, but no one is passing any of it on to anyone else. Shhhhh! :P

If the crossways pub are to be believed then that's exactly what he's doing :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take it the website being down is nothing? I cam don't have the time to read through the pages I've missed, I hope it is tonight and not next week as I am going to snowbombing and will have minimal access to the tinternet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take it the website being down is nothing? I cam don't have the time to read through the pages I've missed, I hope it is tonight and not next week as I am going to snowbombing and will have minimal access to the tinternet

Festival site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having a bbq sunday evening for the missus birthday and would quite like to have a playlist of a newly released lineup on in the back ground.

That idea's gone down the toilet now :(

Take a look at http://www.efestivals.co.uk/forums/topic/174226-setlist-based-spotify-playlist/- pick out some of the stuff you like from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest I've looked at the announcements for the last few years and it doesn't seem like any of them were announced at exactly on the hour. Most of the announcements on the radio were 'from 8am' - but not posted online until 20 mins after.

The Foos were announced at quarter past 7 in the evening and Kanye was announced at 20 to 8 in the evening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might give it a bash, u never know. Might be a Martin Ashford in me somewhere.

Only if you are wearing a Taylor Swift Mask!

Prince, Michael Jackson, Fleetwood Mac etc are generally liked by youngish 'serious' music fans now, and some of their albums got exceptionally good reviews.

Yup, they claim to be but have you seen the Taylor Swift thread on here?!

Good news guys, the festival site has been shut down!

https://twitter.com//status/583617562556178432

"Can you feel it coming"

This seems earlier than normal! (Unless you can still email the Festival office? I know people who went for a vist later in the year than this last year!)

A member of this forum can go one better than that pub because he's seeing Eavis in approx. 2 hours.

Stop stalking him! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest I've looked at the announcements for the last few years and it doesn't seem like any of them were announced at exactly on the hour. Most of the announcements on the radio were 'from 8am' - but not posted online until 20 mins after.

The Foos were announced at quarter past 7 in the evening and Kanye was announced at 20 to 8 in the evening.

The full poster went up at exactly 7pm last year, I remember Zane had ME on the phone to 'announce' Metallica and they were still dragging out who it was going to be at five past when the world already knew..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...