Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

Noel is 100% not at Glastonbury this year. He said a few days ago he will be in Australia (I think) for "a much more handsome fee". It was said while laughing in a tongue in cheek kind of way but that clears up any hope anyone had of him being there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

Man, you are the only person speaking sense. There seem to be a lot of folks in denial that she could be the headliner. To my mind she is now the obvious contender and until she rules herself out or the official line up is released I'm standing my ground. Michael's first comments last year. We want Oasis and Taylor Swift. If she plays we will mainly get a belting pop show of 1989 songs and a selection of her back catalogue but there is not going to be much country as she has changed her entire band. It is likely to sound more pop/ rock I would say

I'm not entirely sure michael eavis said he wanted her. It was more a politeness when asked about her, responding with 'Taylor would be great to follow the Dolly Parton slot – especially being a country singer'

I'm sure he'd have found a reason to respond to anyone positively if he was asked.

I'm not sure, not trying to piss on ur bonfire, just the way I saw it, someone else may know more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't buy that, people have had from 9am Wed morning, you won't sit in a pub all day for the whole weekend, it takes 5 mins to enter details and pay off the balance. The earliest people would have gone away would of been today.

If someone forgets to pay then they obviously arent that bothered to go (unless illness or injury). If u wanna go u make sure u pay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noel is 100% not at Glastonbury this year. He said a few days ago he will be in Australia (I think) for "a much more handsome fee". It was said while laughing in a tongue in cheek kind of way but that clears up any hope anyone had of him being there.

He is in belgium and france on the Fri / Sat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noel is 100% not at Glastonbury this year. He said a few days ago he will be in Australia (I think) for "a much more handsome fee". It was said while laughing in a tongue in cheek kind of way but that clears up any hope anyone had of him being there.

Think it was Austria. Or so someone on here said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone forgets to pay then they obviously arent that bothered to go (unless illness or injury). If u wanna go u make sure u pay

Indeed! It's not something you forget either really is it. You know you paid a deposit, you know when the payment window is going to be and you have 5 out of 7 days to pay it if you were at the extreme going away from Thursday until Monday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think it was Austria. Or so someone on here said

Might have been that. I heard him say it as well though so whoever said it hasn't made it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed! It's not something you forget either really is it. You know you paid a deposit, you know when the payment window is going to be and you have 5 out of 7 days to pay it if you were at the extreme going away from Thursday until Monday.

Agree. They'l obviously be those who can't afford it cause financial situations changed. But overall, U pay if u wanna go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloody hell. Can you imagine waking up the day after deadline thinking 'I'm sure I had something to do.' 'oh fucking hell.'

Well....

My mate couldn't pay til today. (He is paid weekly) I had posted on FB that I'd paid. All our group has (barring him).

This morning as I left for work, I sent him a text:

"Did you pay off glastonbury? It was a 1 day window this year"

Apparently for 10 seconds panic hit him in his half asleep state til he realised. Oh, and I'm a knobhead.

Edited by FuzzyDunlop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloody hell. Can you imagine waking up the day after deadline thinking 'I'm sure I had something to do.' 'oh fucking hell.'

As already posted, if you got to the day after the deadline closed when you're Facebook/Twitter feed/email would've been very clear in telling you about the balance payment window and it hadn't been paid, you weren't that interested and just paid a deposit because you thought you only may attend anyway.

Not harsh, just the reality of it.

Agree. They'l obviously be those who can't afford it cause financial situations changed. But overall, U pay if u wanna go

To be honest, the reason why I don't do much Easter is due to affording to pay this off. Tried to budget for it, clearly didn't happen! Gigs all over the shop this year!

Well....

My mate couldn't pay til today. (He is paid weekly) I had posted on FB that I'd paid. All our group has (barring him).

This morning as I left for work, I sent him a text:

"Did you pay off glastonbury? It was a 1 day window this year"

Apparently for 10 seconds panic hit him in his half asleep state til he realised. Oh, and I'm a knobhead.

I'm more disappointed you didn't wait the extra day and save the postage! ;P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...