Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Gonna also suggest that it's not that radical or unusual to be unfamiliar with the enormous hits of both Guns'n"Roses and Depeche Mode.

Chances are if you’ve got even a passing interest in music, or at least access to radio, you’d have heard Sweet Child Of Mine or Just Can’t Get Enough and be able to identify them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass II said:

Chances are if you’ve got even a passing interest in music, or at least access to radio, you’d have heard Sweet Child Of Mine or Just Can’t Get Enough and be able to identify them.

Yeah, but there's a reasonable chance that some of their big hits may have passed you by entirely, even if it's unlikely you won't know any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Gonna also suggest that it's not that radical or unusual to be unfamiliar with the enormous hits of both Guns'n"Roses and Depeche Mode.

Particularly if you were born outside of the timeframe when both bands were at their peak, which could be argued was thirty years ago 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, anditmakesmesmile said:

No. And I can see on Spotify that I’m in the minority. I also listen to more music than most of my friends and certainly go to more live music than anyone I know. Maybe I’ve heard it before but I’m listening to it now (and, sorry to say, not really enjoying it) and there isn’t a scintilla of recognition. 

Yeah sure. Going to 2 gigs a year which is 2 more gigs than your friends doesnt really count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

Particularly if you were born outside of the timeframe when both bands were at their peak, which could be argued was thirty years ago 

I mean Depeche is more of an LA band than they were ever a London band so its part of the musical fabric in this city. Just like Elton is much more fond of LA than he is of the Uk. And GnR is from LA. So why is there such a demand for artists from LA anyway. Thats 2 years in a row that 2 of the 3 headliners are from La lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Gonna also suggest that it's not that radical or unusual to be unfamiliar with the enormous hits of both Guns'n"Roses and Depeche Mode.

You've missed the point. It was the pointing to Music For The Masses as if to say: " how on earth would I have heard GnR when I was listening to this"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Suprefan said:

I mean Depeche is more of an LA band than they were ever a London band so its part of the musical fabric in this city. Just like Elton is much more fond of LA than he is of the Uk. And GnR is from LA. So why is there such a demand for artists from LA anyway. Thats 2 years in a row that 2 of the 3 headliners are from La lol. 

If you've ever been to Basildon or Watford, you'd see why Dave, Martin and Reg have that preference. 

Maybe next year we'll continue the trend and get Rage Against The Machine, Dr Dre and RHCP...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Chances are if you’ve got even a passing interest in music, or at least access to radio, you’d have heard Sweet Child Of Mine or Just Can’t Get Enough and be able to identify them.

I think you need to add of a certain age as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, fred quimby said:

I think you need to add of a certain age as well. 

I don’t know, those songs came out well before my time but I certainly knew them without seeking them out. There’s probably an argument that Sweet Child Of Mine is one of the biggest rock songs of all time, I’m baffled by anyone who hasn’t heard it. I certainly haven’t ever gone out my way to listen to them but Welcome to the Jungle and Paradise City are also massive songs I knew. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

If you've ever been to Basildon or Watford, you'd see why Dave, Martin and Reg have that preference. 

Maybe next year we'll continue the trend and get Rage Against The Machine, Dr Dre and RHCP...

 

Right no watford slander. He loves the club anyway if not the town

i’m definitely more familiar with depeche mode than GNR

Edited by gfa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kingcrawler said:

I don’t know, those songs came out well before my time but I certainly knew them without seeking them out. There’s probably an argument that Sweet Child Of Mine is one of the biggest rock songs of all time, I’m baffled by anyone who hasn’t heard it. I certainly haven’t ever gone out my way to listen to them but Welcome to the Jungle and Paradise City are also massive songs I knew. 

Thinking of my kids, and people around them. Now I am sure they may have heard the tune  somewhere, but not sure they would know who they are by. Son came with me to Thor so would have heard tunes, but that means little on being able to name a song and band. They are Spotify and YouTube so no chance to probably get a casual listen from radio for example.  Radio is for old people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kingcrawler said:

I don’t know, those songs came out well before my time but I certainly knew them without seeking them out. There’s probably an argument that Sweet Child Of Mine is one of the biggest rock songs of all time, I’m baffled by anyone who hasn’t heard it. I certainly haven’t ever gone out my way to listen to them but Welcome to the Jungle and Paradise City are also massive songs I knew. 

Music is a pretty broad church. I like to think I am pretty knowledgeable about music but every day Heardle from every era reminds me that the list of stuff I don't know is more than equal to that which I know. There are many hugely popular artists that I know nothing by and the small amounts of exposure I have had to them don't make me inclined to want to know them anymore.  It's ok for people to know and like different things. It's what Glastonbury encourages. They wouldn't have small tents in other areas of the festival if the main stages were all that was important. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...