Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

We already know that she'll play Glastonbury for the reduced fee.

 

13 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Indeed, and if Emily is to believe she is interested in returning.

I really hope this is the case. I think I'm kind of on the same thinking as Matt on this - maybe the reduced fee and profile boost made sense when she was coming off the back of an album/singles that didn't really catapult her back to the top (Lover era) but since then she had her whole lockdown thing with Folklore and Evermore which got her a whole new bunch of fans and respect, and then she's released Midnights and got this whole huge Eras tour going 🤷🏻‍♀️

I mean, I am a pessimist and this is kind of my way of insulating myself against disappointment 😅 but genuinely, I hope I am wrong and she actually does want to and will come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

We already know that she'll play Glastonbury for the reduced fee.

My point is that she agreed to do it last time off the back of a shaky stadium tour. Somehow she’s managed to repeak higher than the 1989 days. She doesn’t play by usual rules but I guess that’s why we love miss Swift.

Don’t think she would have come anywhere near Glasto in the 1989 days… so that’s what worries me if she’s back to that place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, clarkete said:

You poor lamb I don't know how you cope. 

"People don't like hypocrites", therefore over three years later everyone brings up an incident she apologised for by the next day.

Have you ever read the coverage she gets in the US?  As with many artists there, she receives a lot of bigotry via social media or from right wing commentators - see much of the coverage about the stupid flute. 

 

It's not just one incident; there were plenty of other things that went against Lizzo's public brand that annoyed people (such as the aforementioned Chris Brown worship).

What a bunch of bigots in the USA are saying is irrelevant, since she's nonetheless a massive act who sells out arenas over there.

So let's quit this whole triggered bullshit where it's a big problem when someone doesn't fall in line about wonderful she is. People have the right not to like or care about certain artists. And I've seen her perform live for that matter, FWIW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, SwallowOrSleepOnTheWetSpot said:

Because it went against her whole brand, that's why. People don't like hypocrites.

IDGAF if she plays Glasto or not, but this whole "you either stand with her or you're with the far right" narrative on the internet is insufferable AF.

She's a person not a brand. Try humanising people. She did what a lot of people did moaned about what she thought was poor service on twitter. Realised she made a mistake and was unequivocal in her apology. I never said the comment about the far right by the way either. Just that it was a nothing incident nearly half a decade ago and she doesn't deserve to have it thrown in her face constantly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Relative to her own success, but she was still one of the biggest acts on the planet.

Yeah I get that but it was probably the first time in a long time that she was struggling to sell all the tickets in the stadiums she was playing. Now she’s … well.. you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nikkic said:

I meant to play at some point. 

If there was an “anytime future headliner” bet my money would be going on her. 

Understand. I’m just being more cautious this time as I’ve thought of her as a guaranteed lock for a few years in a row now. I’m not letting myself get let down like that again 😞 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SwallowOrSleepOnTheWetSpot said:

It's not just one incident; there were plenty of other things that went against Lizzo's public brand that annoyed people (such as the aforementioned Chris Brown worship).

What a bunch of bigots in the USA are saying is irrelevant, since she's nonetheless a massive act who sells out arenas over there.

So let's quit this whole triggered bullshit where it's a big problem when someone doesn't fall in line about wonderful she is. People have the right not to like or care about certain artists. And I've seen her perform live for that matter, FWIW.

Got to say, you seem triggered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Emily’s exact words, and this was a couple of days after this year’s festival.

“I think we’ve got Taylor on board next time she’s doing some touring,” says Eavis. “We would love to have her back, obviously.”

For someone who is very careful with what they say in public she wouldn’t be saying that if there was no agreement on either side to have her back.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Emily’s exact words, and this was a couple of days after this year’s festival.

“I think we’ve got Taylor on board next time she’s doing some touring,” says Eavis. “We would love to have her back, obviously.”

For someone who is very careful with what they say in public she wouldn’t be saying that if there was no agreement on either side to have her back.

 

Emily must be very confident to be saying that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...