Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

I’m getting really, really fucking tired of people making me out to say things I’m not saying and throwing stuff that I’ve done ages ago at me. I’m sure you all enjoy getting a rise from it. Or whenever someone gets bored dragging something from the past to win an argument. You’re one of the worst offenders. Fuck you.

 

Well I hope you enjoyed it and got the rise you wanted.

 

Fuck all of you. This place is the pits.

Who had Jan 7th down for Matt’s first flounce of the year?

Get stroppy all you want Matthew, you can’t complain about other using “facts” to back up arguments when you have done it so many times yourself down the years. Just as you can’t complain about the “Glasto Chat” people who seem to live rent free in your head whilst simultaneously decrying and shouting down anything that doesn’t fit in with your view of how the festival should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I call out Matt more than most for some of the mad things he occasionally comes out with; I think y'all are being a bit ridiculous here.

He does mention spotify stats and what not but not in relation to whether an act is good live or not which is what he was talking about.

I'm personally really looking forward to Elton John and Guns N Roses but he certainly has a point about all 3 headliners not having a great life reputation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hugh Jass II said:

I genuinely don’t intend to start arguments, I just call out bullshit when I see it.

Yes you absolutely fucking do. You are always the first to instigate dog pile and you’re one of the worst offenders of it. You’re always the first to try and make out like you’re my mate and you have my best interest. But I know exactly what you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Florian Saucer Attack said:

While I call out Matt more than most for some of the mad things he occasionally comes out with; I think y'all are being a bit ridiculous here.

He does mention spotify stats and what not but not in relation to whether an act is good live or not which is what he was talking about.

I'm personally really looking forward to Elton John and Guns N Roses but he certainly has a point about all 3 headliners not having a great life reputation 

It’s more the hypocrisy of him decrying people using facts and figures to defend an act when we all know if it was an act he liked then he’d be doing the exact same thing.

Elton doesn’t have a bad live reputation anyway, folk who have seen him say he’s great. As CalGon says it’s just the Dill Danding stuff people use as a stick to beat him with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hugh Jass II said:

It’s more the hypocrisy of him decrying people using facts and figures to defend an act when we all know if it was an act he liked then he’d be doing the exact same thing.

 

See what I mean, always happy to instigate a dog pile over something I’ve not done or “might do”. It’s absolutely fucking tiring being accused of things I’ve not actually done but you want to make out I’m doing. I’ve actually had enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

It’s more the hypocrisy of him decrying people using facts and figures to defend an act when we all know if it was an act he liked then he’d be doing the exact same thing.

I've brought this up with Matt before but he wasn't doing it here.

 

I really hope the folks who say Elton John is good live are right but there is a large group of people who say he is not good, whether they are correct or not is another matter but I don't think it's outrageous of Matt to mention their opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Florian Saucer Attack said:

I've brought this up with Matt before but he wasn't doing it here.

 

I really hope the folks who say Elton John is good live are right but there is a large group of people who say he is not good, whether they are correct or not is another matter but I don't think it's outrageous of Matt to mention their opinion 

Same was said for The Rolling Stones and Macca.  Once there’s 100,000 people in the crowd singing along to every word it really won’t matter at all 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

See what I mean, always happy to instigate a dog pile over something I’ve not done or “might do”. It’s absolutely fucking tiring being accused of things I’ve not actually done but you want to make out I’m doing. I’ve actually had enough. 

Its an internet forum frequented by people with names like "hugh jass", "4assedmonkey" and "beerqueen". 

I wouldnt worry about it too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

See what I mean, always happy to instigate a dog pile over something I’ve not done or “might do”. It’s absolutely fucking tiring being accused of things I’ve not actually done but you want to make out I’m doing. I’ve actually had enough. 

Believe it or not Matt, I actually do have better things to do with my time than think up creative and innovative ways to victimise you on an internet message board.

Surely you can see the irony and humour in your “facts” comment when you yourself have done so many times in the past? That’s not dog piling, that’s just pointing out something amusing.

I genuinely apologise if you feel I’ve been over zealous in my posts towards yourself and will reel it in in future. FWIW I still think you’re a good kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

I’m getting really, really fucking tired of people making me out to say things I’m not saying and throwing stuff that I’ve done ages ago at me. I’m sure you all enjoy getting a rise from it. Or whenever someone gets bored dragging something from the past to win an argument. You’re one of the worst offenders. Fuck you.

 

Well I hope you enjoyed it and got the rise you wanted.

 

Fuck all of you. This place is the pits.

I wasn’t trying to get a rise. I’m always trying to get people to understand the gap between them liking an act and them being ‘weak’ or ‘a bad booking’ or ‘past it’ or whatever phrase they try and attach.

Very few people get as worked up about it as you have done here. If anyone was trying to get a rise it’s you. You know full well (hopefully! I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt here) you could have phrased everything you’ve put today differently but chose not to, and the inevitable result is you got a reaction. That doesn’t make ‘this place ‘the pits,’ it’s just cause and effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Surely you can see the irony and humour in your “facts” comment when you yourself have done so many times in the past? That’s not dog piling, that’s just pointing out something amusing.

 

Everyone has said things in the past that they no longer stand by but it feels like I’m still getting stick for things I’ve stopped doing and it’s very tiring. and tbh I’m not very quick to accept your apology because I want this to stop.

I also think it’s a gross manipulation of what I’ve said in the past. I’ve brought up Spotify stats in the past to explain why an act would get BOOKED. Not as evidence of them being a solid /exciting live performer etc. Again this is what really really is getting to me. Twisting absolutely everything I say to get a rise. You continue to do it even when you’ve apologised in the past. I want it to stop. Especially for things I’ve not said or done in a while. 

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sisco said:

Same was said for The Rolling Stones and Macca.  Once there’s 100,000 people in the crowd singing along to every word it really won’t matter at all 

That Stones one was funny. The difference in perception between people watching at home and those in the field felt huge. Maybe it wasn’t but reading the comments when I got home on the Monday was a real eye opener. I must have assumed everyone would enjoy it as much as the people around me in the field did. So naive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

That Stones one was funny. The difference in perception between people watching at home and those in the field felt huge. Maybe it wasn’t but reading the comments when I got home on the Monday was a real eye opener. I must have assumed everyone would enjoy it as much as the people around me in the field did. So naive.

That's why it's best to just ignore all the YouTube clips we'll see between now and June that 'prove' Elton or GnR will be shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, nikkic said:

GNR question…..

Have they always had a bad live rep, or is it that they’re now “past it”? 

I heard good things about their 2017 reunion show and 2011 shows. Tottenham this summer was mired by Axl's illness which ultimately lead them to cancel their glasgow show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Spotify stats are fascinating to me - it’s an illustration of a predominantly younger and more tech-savvy group and their preferences, instead of the older generation who are/were much more likely to actually spend money on records/tapes/CDs.
There’s an online game of Higher! Lower! / play your cards right, where you pick between metal songs according to which has higher plays on Spotify - it’s absolutely infuriating as a metal fan of a certain age, as I naturally assume that classic acts like Sabbath and Maiden must surely have much higher plays than nonsense like Papa Roach. But no, due to unfathomable TikTok/dumb reasons, papa roach are basically untouchable. It’s baffling 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, nikkic said:

GNR question…..

Have they always had a bad live rep, or is it that they’re now “past it”? 

Late 80’s they had an absolutely amazing live rep. But that was indoor venues, clubs etc, and then they got the reputation of riots, turning up late, and all the rest of the nonsense as they started playing stadiums etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Everyone has said things in the past that they no longer stand by but it feels like I’m still getting stick for things I’ve stopped doing and it’s very tiring. and tbh I’m not very quick to accept your apology because I want this to stop.

It wasn't that long ago you were declaring yourself above everyone else in terms of being in tune with the direction the festival was going in cos you guessed a couple of acts would be there. Now it seems you're throwing a hissy fit when, entirely unpredictably, that turns out not to be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

That's why it's best to just ignore all the YouTube clips we'll see between now and June that 'prove' Elton or GnR will be shit.

It’s the Macca debate all over again isn’t it?

You’re absolutely right though personally being on the fence about whether to go to GNR I am tempted to look for a set on YouTube at some point. Just remember to allow for the quality of the recording and how different it will be in the Pyramid field and adjust my expectations accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Florian Saucer Attack said:

I've brought this up with Matt before but he wasn't doing it here.

 

I really hope the folks who say Elton John is good live are right but there is a large group of people who say he is not good, whether they are correct or not is another matter but I don't think it's outrageous of Matt to mention their opinion 

I genuinely don’t know anyone who has actually seen Elton John do a live show last year who thought he was awful. I have even seen people say they went not especially liking him because they got a free ticket and they really enjoyed him. That’s actually why I am quite excited about him. His live reputation seems pretty solid. I am not a huge fan. I have never bought an album by him, said just yesterday I would not pay to see him live but he’s a fantastic booking for the festival. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...