Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

Just now, Florian Saucer Attack said:

i thought it was so cynical of Swift to release four covers of her last album as she knows the rapid Swifties would buy all of them

Oh same here. I can respect artists want to make money obviously but some of the methods nowadays seem incredibly manipulative. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Florian Saucer Attack said:

in what way does he treat his fans like shit? 

This is a genuine question I don't know much about him other than his two albums

Frank is probably in my top 5 artists of all time, but even us fans embrace the face that he quite evidently does not like us lol. He rarely, rarely, rarelyyyy plays live, and has never made any attempt to connect with his fans through other platforms. I'm not really arsed by it, as the guy doesn't really owe us anything, and I love him nonetheless, but he is incredibly enigmatic - for good or bad. 

He's also began to run a pretty exclusive jewellery range called 'Homer' which he appears to devoting a lot of time with. Again, fair enough if that's what he wants to do, but he's not exactly endearing himself to fans by selling jewels worth $000s - cock ring included.

Edited by JayDiesel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BenG92 said:

 

Tool are my favourite band of all time but there's no way I'm buying the $500 glass skull they just released because it's "limited edition" 

On that subject, Fear Inoculum is one of my favourite albums but I'm not spending £100 on a CD for it even if it does look fancy! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Florian Saucer Attack said:

it does look pretty cool though

Stop it now, I know it does, don't tempt me. I've already been disgusted at myself for buying their signed poster for half the price of a skull but those things instantly double in value the moment you get one at a show. 

Edited by BenG92
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Metal Monkey said:

On that subject, Fear Inoculum is one of my favourite albums but I'm not spending £100 on a CD for it even if it does look fancy! 

How much was that vinyl bundle, like £300 or something daft? Then after they fleeced all the vinyl people they released a regular ugly edition for much less. I love them but they're one of the worst bands on the planet for this stuff, I just can't blame them when so many of us idiots buy into it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BenG92 said:

Stop it now, I know it does, don't tempt me. I've already been disgusted at myself for buying their signed poster for half the price of a skull but those things instantly double in value the moment you get one at a show. 

How about we split the cost?

It will come to my house first and then at some point in the unspecified future it could maybe go to your house for a brief period

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BenG92 said:

How much was that vinyl bundle, like £300 or something daft? Then after they fleeced all the vinyl people they released a regular ugly edition for much less. I love them but they're one of the worst bands on the planet for this stuff, I just can't blame them when so many of us idiots buy into it. 

I like having the limited edition stuff or nice artwork, and on previous albums it was a reasonable price to get it. This time round there was no normal CD, only the £100 one at first, which does take the piss a bit. I'd love that vinyl too but £300 is crazy. It is a business I guess, I'm sure they have done alright out of it. 

Can't complain too much as I spent £400 on their gig tickets for me and the Mrs so I'm still a mug!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Metal Monkey said:

Can't complain too much as I spent £400 on their gig tickets for me and the Mrs so I'm still a mug!

Think our 5th row Manchester seats were £95 each but I signed up for their £50 club for a better chance at getting them, we're all mugs!

That said, that price for a guaranteed amazing view and 2.5 hour spectacle when blink-182 are charging the same to play badly to standing people for 90 minutes... it's not all bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

This. This is the kind of research I come here for!

The Beatles weren’t on streaming services for many years which will explain that. Also with The Beatles everyone has a different favourite because there are so many. 
 

Sorry quotes the wrong post! 

Edited by gigpusher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BenG92 said:

Think our 5th row Manchester seats were £95 each but I signed up for their £50 club for a better chance at getting them, we're all mugs!

That said, that price for a guaranteed amazing view and 2.5 hour spectacle when blink-182 are charging the same to play badly to standing people for 90 minutes... it's not all bad. 

No complaints from me either actually, best gigs of last year. And £95 for 5th row is good, 5th row at the o2 all seemed to be Ticketmaster flexible pricing at around £150-200. 

If people mention Tool enough in this thread maybe they will headline!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Metal Monkey said:

If people mention Tool enough in this thread maybe they will headline!

Ha, when pigs fly eh. Download 2019 was funny enough, I think 3/4 of the people there had never heard of them and the remaining 1/4 (including me) went solely because they were there. 13 bloody years it had been! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PGTIps said:

Two predominantly non-english speaking headliners at Coachella is a big moment. Deserves applauding.

Adore Frank personally, Blonde is an incredible record. If he actually shows for the set it will be a coup for the festival. 

Yeah it’s pretty insane when you think about it. Ten, maybe even five years ago it would be hard to imagine a non English speaking act headlining a festival like Coachella (unless there’s some from the past I’m forgetting). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Yeah it’s pretty insane when you think about it. Ten, maybe even five years ago it would be hard to imagine a non English speaking act headlining a festival like Coachella (unless there’s some from the past I’m forgetting). 

You are - Fela Kuti and King Sunny Ade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, theouterlimits said:

The thought occurred to me - the apparent headliner trio is the first trio in a long time (maybe ever!?) where each artist has a song which has had over a billion streams on Spotify. 

AMs: Do I Wanna Know & Why'd You Only Call Me When You're High?
GNR: Sweet Child O Mine
Elton: Cold Heart 

Not even Paul McCartney has a billion-streamer, none of the Beatles songs have hit that milestone. Nor the Stones! Shows just what an enduring hit Sweet Child is. I'll likely be elsewhere, but the more I think about it, the more I find myself coming round to the idea that GNR in its current lineup is a stronger booking than many seem to think

There are certainly a few who've cropped up who have multiple billion streamers, but as you say maybe not in the same year... 

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/heres-every-song-over-1-billion-spotify-streams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, clarkete said:

There are certainly a few who've cropped up who have multiple billion streamers, but as you say maybe not in the same year... 

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/heres-every-song-over-1-billion-spotify-streams

Yeah it's obviously not a perfect metric in terms of establishing popularity, but what it is very good at is showing which established artists/songs are still popular now and have transcended the generations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, therefused said:

like you believed roxy music were playing?

that was from the same contact who had correctly given me the headliners for several years, including last year. i had every reason to believe them, just as you're now believing me saying gnr and am. 😛 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Neil said:

that was from the same contact who had correctly given me the headliners for several years, including last year. i had every reason to believe them, just as you're now believing me saying gnr and am. 😛 

Is it that same contact who's now given you GnR and AM? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BenG92 said:

How much was that vinyl bundle, like £300 or something daft? Then after they fleeced all the vinyl people they released a regular ugly edition for much less. I love them but they're one of the worst bands on the planet for this stuff, I just can't blame them when so many of us idiots buy into it. 

I got the  £40 vinyl. It is no worse than any other artists regular records in terms of how ugly it is. Sounds incredible though.

Still waiting for 10,000 days on vinyl though...

And re-issues of Aenima (too rare) and Lateralus (Pic disc only so far - ugh)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Alvoram said:

Is it that same contact who's now given you GnR and AM? 

no, those have come from another long time contact, who has given me an endless load of correct stuff including about the blur wembley shows for this year.

 i believed both of those contacts them because they have an excellent proven record of being right, which rough bloke doesn't have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Neil said:

no, those have come from another long time contact, who has given me an endless load of correct stuff including about the blur wembley shows for this year.

 i believed both of those contacts them because they have an excellent proven record of being right, which rough bloke doesn't have.

Cheers. 🙂

P.s not interested in the argument at all, I was just interested to know if this was the contact you'd been correctly predicting headliners with for the last few years or not. 👍 That other nonsense is none of my business. 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Alvoram said:

Cheers. 🙂

P.s not interested in the argument at all, I was just interested to know if this was the contact you'd been correctly predicting headliners with for the last few years or not. 👍 That other nonsense is none of my business. 🙂 

not sure if this guy has given me headliners before (cos he's sent me so much over time), he does send me lots of only correct info  every year and has for a number of years. i know who he is and where he gets his info (hes in the right loops to hear stuff).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...