Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, 2loor2iller said:

Well she is apparently about to announce a greatest hits tours…

Wake me up if said greatest hits tour includes both full songs and recognisable arrangements.

If she pulled that out of the bag then yes she could do a fantastic headline set, but at the moment history suggests neither is likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, kingbadger said:

QOTSA could sub any of those headliners easily. Dreading the inevitable clash between Elton and QOTSA or The Prodigy on Other

The Prodigy most likely. Every time they headline Other there is somebody I can't miss at the Pyramid. Oasis 1995 and Blur 2009 spring to mind if I'm not wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ericlered said:

The Prodigy most likely. Every time they headline Other there is somebody I can't miss at the Pyramid. Oasis 1995 and Blur 2009 spring to mind if I'm not wrong.

I'd agree this could happen, much to my annoyance. Would be an effective way to split the crowds as they're both classic acts who I'd argue are equally as famous in their genre. Glastonbury isn't always that logical though, as we've seen in the past several years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Skip997 said:

Our so everyone too many people are hoping

IF it's the case then GLF need to wake up, it's 2022 FFS.

A year in which Elton has had two number one tracks on constant rotation on the radio.

It's weird. It's really weird that he's having that level of success right now. One could also call the entire Lockdown album quite a cynical way of trying to make himself relevant again. But you can't deny that it worked. Honestly if we took the three most relevant acts from the folks currently rumoured or confirmed, it'd be Elton, Harry Styles and Taylor. Elton beats out Eminem, GnR, Arctics, Blur, Beyonce and pretty much anyone else mentioned.

Yes, he had his career peak many decades ago. But right now he's a big deal. You can find that weird, you can not understand it - hell, I'm a fan and I find it weird and don't understand it too, but you can't deny that it's happening. 

3 hours ago, Bishmaple said:

Does this open up the option for Britney legend slot then guest appearance for her track with reg????

I'm not sure that version is even performable live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting the BBC took a bit of a lead revealing this. I do wonder if there's some sort of deal there that's allowed them to finally get Elton to play and not break the bank. So the BBC get to broadcast it on the night and iPlayer for 30 days, and then rights revert to Elton and he can sell it to Disney Plus or whoever.

(Which also makes me wonder, if any such arrangements exists, and how much of a diva he is, if we'll end up with some rules around flags in front of the Pyramid, as he's going to want to be able to get those wide shots)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DeanoL said:

A year in which Elton has had two number one tracks on constant rotation on the radio.

It's weird. It's really weird that he's having that level of success right now. One could also call the entire Lockdown album quite a cynical way of trying to make himself relevant again. But you can't deny that it worked. Honestly if we took the three most relevant acts from the folks currently rumoured or confirmed, it'd be Elton, Harry Styles and Taylor. Elton beats out Eminem, GnR, Arctics, Blur, Beyonce and pretty much anyone else mentioned.

Yes, he had his career peak many decades ago. But right now he's a big deal. You can find that weird, you can not understand it - hell, I'm a fan and I find it weird and don't understand it too, but you can't deny that it's happening. 

I remember Garth Jennings in an interview talking about having a meeting with David Furnish when he wanted to use an Elton song in Sing - and Furnish saying they were keen to have Elton associated with a kids film because whole new generations would grow up with him, and that Furnish skitted legacy acts who are too controlling with their back catalogues becoming irrelevant

The Lockdown album is a pile of shit IMO, but Cold Heart is ok and comfortably his most streamed song on Spotify. I guess they know what they're doing!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw Reg at Vicarage Road Stadium this year - probably the only artist that will EVER play at the home of football, that was a great show and a great atmosphere, but that was around £90 for cheap tickets so to have him included as part of the festival, for his last ever UK show, and for the potential to be one of the all time great Pyramid headline sets makes me a very happy person 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Updated:

Current state of play:

CONFIRMED:

Reginald Dwight

Very likely:

Arctic Monkeys - Large stadium tour with GSH,  claims they are doing it by ITK people on their forums.

Guns n Roses - Mentioned by poster on here who also named Elton, Emily has bigged them up previously. BST date the week after.

Possibilities:

Red Hot Chilli Peppers - Headlining European festivals the week before.

The 1975 - Playing TRNSMT and have been rumoured in the past.

Eminem - Rumoured in the Sun to be in talks

Rhianna - As above

Dua Lipa - Rumoured to be headlining Coachella

Very unlikely:

Blur - Dublin gig on the Saturday

Harry Styles - Belgium gig on the Saturday

Out:

Taylor - Gigs in the US that weekend

Liam Gallagher - Boardmasters exclusive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hugh Jass II said:

It's probably Guns n Roses.

Interesting. Im spit in what to see if that's the headliners. 

Absolutely hate AM last two albums and heard mixed things about their R+L performance this year. 

Dreaming of Fred again playing which will surely clash with a headliner. Would love to see EJ not too fussed with GnR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aj6658 said:

Interesting. Im spit in what to see if that's the headliners. 

Absolutely hate AM last two albums and heard mixed things about their R+L performance this year. 

Dreaming of Fred again playing which will surely clash with a headliner. Would love to see EJ not too fussed with GnR

The only reason I wouldn’t be too annoyed about GnR (despite the fact it’s a stale, uninspiring booking) is that there’s a chance they could clash with Fred so I wouldn’t be there anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Skip997 said:

No problem with Elton playing, just let's have artists in the appropriate slots. I don't like him, but he is a legend, get him in that slot, free up the headline slot for someone more contemporary.

I didn't get to see either due to clashes but Bille and Kendrick are the sort of booking they should be looking at for headliners. Saw Billie in 2019, she was very good.

So definitely not Eminem then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TGCarr said:

I’m so fucking gassed

 

AM, GNR, EJ

 

1975, Prodigy and some other big sub.

 

great

I am liking your thinking.  Just need Fred on WH Saturday Night and I would be doing Fri Other / Sat WH / Sun Pyramid.  Would be incredible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...