Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

BBC Coverage 2022


Cooter

Recommended Posts

Absolutely loving the coverage this year, this is the first time I've managed to follow the live stage streams which helps make up a little for not being there.  My memory is crap but it seems to me the Park Stage has a lot more coverage that it used to.  I saw some brilliant sets there in the past main one being the secret gig by the Last Shadow Puppets when they first came out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Suprefan said:

Youre hilarious. Im not gonna sit here and list of the endless male artists who do the same lyrics wise as megan or cardi and nobody says anything.  And really, lil nas? A gay black man cant express himself now? Im sure you would pass out if you walked into the nyc downlow one late night.

You're hilarious.

 

We're talking about whether or not these sorts of acts should be mainstream pop stars and role models for children with such overtly different to whether they should be allowed to do what they do - nobodies debating the latter and I've a lot of respect for Lil Nas X and artists like him. It's a bit like appreciating Drake, AJ Tracey or Aitch as musicians but I'm pretty sure most of the people wouldn't want their young children idolising them rather than Harry Styles or Ed Sheeran. 

 

Obviously public opinion disagrees with me given both Cardi B and Lil Nas X's sales/streaming figures and chart positions absolutely prove their popularity.

 

Maybe I'm being prudish but sexual songs from the era of censorship always sound a lot more damn romantic than this stuff. 'Hey boy do you ever get bored playing with your toy, I'll show you mine if you'll show me yours' (from B*witcheds Ce Est La Vie) just sounds a lot nicer as a lyric and is a lot more creative than 'put your dick/fanny in my mouth while I'm riding' regardless of whose singing it and I'm sure parents would be more comfortable with their kids singing the former.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MORNING! I've not watched Macca yet (and doesn't sound like I can anyway), but I've thoroughly enjoyed reading through all your comments - the ups...the downs....people booing....people not booing....boring....AMAZING....where is Jamie T's jaw??

Thanks for the laughs. Looking forward to what today brings!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, verrymerry said:

Anyone listening to 6 Music? Apparently they delayed showing McCartneys set by an hour due to "the complexity of the show" - Um, sorry what? 

Paul did mention he was using pretty much all his own crew, so maybe they wanted to make sure nothing went completely tits up before broadcasting it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, willgooneday said:

You're hilarious.

 

We're talking about whether or not these sorts of acts should be mainstream pop stars and role models for children with such overtly different to whether they should be allowed to do what they do - nobodies debating the latter and I've a lot of respect for Lil Nas X and artists like him. It's a bit like appreciating Drake, AJ Tracey or Aitch as musicians but I'm pretty sure most of the people wouldn't want their young children idolising them rather than Harry Styles or Ed Sheeran. 

 

Obviously public opinion disagrees with me given both Cardi B and Lil Nas X's sales/streaming figures and chart positions absolutely prove their popularity.

 

Maybe I'm being prudish but sexual songs from the era of censorship always sound a lot more damn romantic than this stuff. 'Hey boy do you ever get bored playing with your toy, I'll show you mine if you'll show me yours' (from B*witcheds Ce Est La Vie) just sounds a lot nicer as a lyric and is a lot more creative than 'put your dick/fanny in my mouth while I'm riding' regardless of whose singing it and I'm sure parents would be more comfortable with their kids singing the former.

 

Why do all artists have to be appropriate for children?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, henry bear said:

Why do all artists have to be appropriate for children?

 

Try reading the post again? These are the biggest artists on Spotify and regular in the UK Top 40 - they're actively courting young people as their fanbase with this fifth - for which the target market is teenage children and younger - the biggest music consumers - these aren't niche album acts. Radio and streaming music should be friendly for anyone to listen to in the main, it's not at the minute - there's more bleeps than actual words on most chart shows now. 

 

And if you're gonna do smut at least make it witty and intelligent like Judge Dread. A lot of old pop is not really appropriate for kids, but the lyrics were written in a way a child could happily sing it without realising how bad it was til they grew up - that's not gonna happen with Megan Thee Stallion is it? 

Edited by willgooneday
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

Youngbld - just watching - looked epic 

 

Jack Saunder's (who most be Radio 1's best new presenter in years and great to see him on telly) introduced the replay of his set by saying he booked him in 2015(?) for a gig where he played to about 10 people and performed with a similar sort of energy. The guys one of the few who's just born to do it like that and can knock it out the park - like Idles or Frank Carter (not performing this year) - the contrast to Elijah Thompson from Inhaler, whose an incredibly accomplished musician but seemed to have the stage presence of a wet blanket (a bit unnerving for someone whose dad is Bono) watching it on Iplayer yesterday

Edited by willgooneday
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was some weird stuff going on with flags yesterday at the Other before Glass Animals, tv people asking security to move or lower flags or something? Maybe they’re worried about having something inappropriate in shot and they literally have to review every set for compliance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing the reason for missing the first couple of acts off every stage is staff contract/BBC working hours stuff, that's the only reason I can think of really. They've missed some stuff I'd love to see like Kae Tempest and Ziggy Marley but I understand it's probably a lot of work to do so much blanket coverage across the weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overall the BBC coverage is incredibly good and certainly helping me with not being there.

It's the first time I've watched it on TV for quite a few years and totally get how the coverage fuels people's desire to go next year. I went out with a bunch of mates yesterday and every single one of them said they'd try for tickets in October despite not normally being interested in going to gigs and hating camping!

Part of me wishes the BBC coverage wasn't available....might make it easier come ticket day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back for Sunday, when we there our Sunday was amazing, chilled out met so many people doing the same, no one really on the list for me so will be tuning in on anything new.

Have a good one everyone here and the lucky buggers who are there!!.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, benali said:

Warmduscher, let's have it

Powerful start and then the second song is a banger. Great live band. Clams is one of the best frontmen around, very free and loose with the profanities at 2pm on a Sunday 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...