Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

U.S. Presidential Election


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, shoptildrop said:

Jesus!! 😞

 

 

So turns out all of the panic over how Trump supporters would react wasn’t unfounded at all - they just decided to wait until the orange dipshit had well and truly lost in their eyes before the real shit hit the fan.

Really hope this is mostly internet tough talk and doesn’t lead to something much much worse, but as Wednesday proved, they’re more than willing to kill to make their mark.

Edited by FloorFiller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this occured to me, and I don't know enough about how the process works over there -

With all these cretins using "The President told me to do it" as a defence, does that create the possibility that Trump could be called to testify at their criminal trials?

And if so, are they any consequences if he refuses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, incident said:

So this occured to me, and I don't know enough about how the process works over there -

With all these cretins using "The President told me to do it" as a defence, does that create the possibility that Trump could be called to testify at their criminal trials?

And if so, are they any consequences if he refuses?

Yes, he can be subpoenaed. It just gets sticky after that. The issue with the last trial was that no witnesses were allowed and it just killed a lot of things coming to light. I doubt this ends up being that big of a problem. But there are plenty of others to call upon and prove the point. And having so much video evidence anyway favors the dems. And having Rudy Guiliani spew his nonsense to Chief Justice John Roberts is going to be incredible. He will try really hard to not roll his eyes at what will be said.  Also if Kamala can question orange face since she is still a senator and use her prosecutor skills on him, he will easily make himself guilty. 
 

What we have to look at right now is if enough gop senators stick with a conviction or not. A 2/3 majority vote is needed to wrap it up. I think Mcconnel is gonna have to weigh the consequences if he doesnt go along with this on this occasion. And theyre still wanting to have a candidate for 2024 which is just insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Suprefan said:

Yes, he can be subpoenaed. It just gets sticky after that. The issue with the last trial was that no witnesses were allowed and it just killed a lot of things coming to light. I doubt this ends up being that big of a problem. But there are plenty of others to call upon and prove the point. And having so much video evidence anyway favors the dems. And having Rudy Guiliani spew his nonsense to Chief Justice John Roberts is going to be incredible. He will try really hard to not roll his eyes at what will be said.  Also if Kamala can question orange face since she is still a senator and use her prosecutor skills on him, he will easily make himself guilty. 
 

What we have to look at right now is if enough gop senators stick with a conviction or not. A 2/3 majority vote is needed to wrap it up. I think Mcconnel is gonna have to weigh the consequences if he doesnt go along with this on this occasion. And theyre still wanting to have a candidate for 2024 which is just insane.

Sorry - I was thinking more along the lines of what would happen at the inevitable criminal trials of the domestic terrorists rather than the Senate trial of Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"One of the Capitol police officers took a selfie with someone who was part of the mob that overtook the Capitol and the other wore a 'Make America Great Again' hat and started directing people around the building, according to Rep. Tim Ryan, an Ohio Democrat. He didn't disclose how many other officers were under investigation but confirmed it was between 10 and 15, and didn't say what they were being scrutinized for except that it was their behavior during the riot." — CNN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, jparx said:

Just saw the footage of Biden getting his jab. For someone who’s the but of so many old jokes, he was looking like the coolest bloke alive there.

There's definitely a subset of the internet that are promoting the lie that Biden is a doddery senile old duffer, to the point that reasonable people I know believe it, because they only see the compilation of clips when he stutters (and he has suffered from stuttering his whole life) or when he gets a name wrong.

I know that many have called for someone younger, and there's definitely some ageism at work there. Age should be irrelevant, as long as he is fit enough for the stresses of the job. And the experience and wisdom that comes from a long career is something we should celebrate.

And that goes for Trump too - For everything wrong with him, I wouldn't hold his age against him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, maelzoid said:

There's definitely a subset of the internet that are promoting the lie that Biden is a doddery senile old duffer, to the point that reasonable people I know believe it, because they only see the compilation of clips when he stutters (and he has suffered from stuttering his whole life) or when he gets a name wrong.

I know that many have called for someone younger, and there's definitely some ageism at work there. Age should be irrelevant, as long as he is fit enough for the stresses of the job. And the experience and wisdom that comes from a long career is something we should celebrate.

And that goes for Trump too - For everything wrong with him, I wouldn't hold his age against him.

That people honestly believe that Trump is a better/younger candidate because he paints himself up and dyes his hair and raves like a lunatic vs. Biden ageing gracefully and having overcome a stutter is hilarious. If either of those two are falling in to dementia at this point, it’s clearly Trump, not Biden.

It seems to be a widely held belief that Biden will only serve one term, but by the end of that term it’s a certainty that he’ll be in better form than Trump will, who is apparently planning a ‘24 run. I struggle to believe Trump will make it to ‘28.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

There isn’t that much of an age difference between Biden and Trump. 
 

And only one of them is dependent on amphetamines and wears adult nappies. 

It makes it sound kind of fun when you put it like that, to be fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CaledonianGonzo said:

Well be doing well if we dont see these bastards trying something on with Iran in the next week.

Baffling system where someone remains in office for two months after being voted out 

The election process goes back to a time where votes had to be delivered via horse and cart. 
 

Why update the laws to suit the modern world. 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I'm not sure, they aren't giving any headliner in that format 2hours and Foos would have at least 2. I wouldn't say Reading is likely for them next year either. If they are as said going big on a tour with stadiums and festivals then the UK is once place they can definitely do stadiums and that would rule them out. And that's even if they come back for a second UK stint as I fully expect them in Europe from very early. That could be seen as hyperthetical but there are is some places I cannot see them not doing from history.
    • One problem could be that many of the hospitality packages are already sold out. Unless you’ve a media contact, media organisations normally get a hospitality allocation.
    • I agree on WA taking a year off in 2027. But if they got the call from R&L could see them having a similar August to what Fontaines are doing now. A few random shows + 2/3 other festivals. The festival/LN does seem to love them as well so there is a chance they take a punt.   I did see about Rodrigo potentially doing a stadium in Poland but no clue if that would be 2027 or 2028, I just can't see her at the Fest at all, seems too big in current climate.   If I were to guess the headliners next year I'd go with Fred Again/Foos/Capaldi/Olivia Dean/Biffy or Wolf Alice/Some Rapper, Tems?
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...