Jump to content

Kasabian//Tom Meighan


RarerThanDandyB
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Homer said:

Everyone makes mistakes in life. He has paid a very high for his.

It seems like his 'attack' was out of character. His partner has forgiven him, so maybe it is time to give the fella a second chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, eastynh said:

Everyone makes mistakes in life. He has paid a very high for his.

It seems like his 'attack' was out of character. His partner has forgiven him, so maybe it is time to give the fella a second chance.

Looks at court transcripts of the violent attack in front a child

 

Nah, you're alright. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

Has he?

He's not gone to prison. He still gets national news coverage in the press (with a sympathetic angle). Still rich, I imagine.

What high price?

Hes lost his job, he has to do community service, he has been publicly shamed. What more do you want? Do you want to hang him? What good does locking him up do? Is he a danger to the public? 

His missus has suggested the episide was nothing like the CPS has suggested and he has been stitched up. Seeing as his partner is not only the victim, but also the main witness, we have to give some credence to her statement.

Would he have lost his job if he worked in a factory? Probably not. Would he have been vilified on public forums if he had worked in Aldi? No he would not. So he has paid a bigger price than most. He has been made an example of due to his status.

He has admitted to his crime and accepted the punishment. By all accounts this seems an isolated episode and totally out of character. He has looked for help in relation to his alcohol use and seems to be taking steps to rebuild his life.

Domestic violence can never be excused and violence against women is abhorent. Yet the bloke does not deserve to be vilified for the rest of his days just for one indiscretion. 

His missus has forgiven him and he is trying to rehabilitate himself. Lets hope he emerges from this as a better person. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eastynh said:

Hes lost his job, he has to do community service, he has been publicly shamed. What more do you want? Do you want to hang him? What good does locking him up do? Is he a danger to the public? 

His missus has suggested the episide was nothing like the CPS has suggested and he has been stitched up. Seeing as his partner is not only the victim, but also the main witness, we have to give some credence to her statement.

Would he have lost his job if he worked in a factory? Probably not. Would he have been vilified on public forums if he had worked in Aldi? No he would not. So he has paid a bigger price than most. He has been made an example of due to his status.

He has admitted to his crime and accepted the punishment. By all accounts this seems an isolated episode and totally out of character. He has looked for help in relation to his alcohol use and seems to be taking steps to rebuild his life.

Domestic violence can never be excused and violence against women is abhorent. Yet the bloke does not deserve to be vilified for the rest of his days just for one indiscretion. 

His missus has forgiven him and he is trying to rehabilitate himself. Lets hope he emerges from this as a better person. 

He didn't get a prison sentence and originally pleaded not guilty until the CCTV came out.

 

Zero sympathy. Community service is a joke for that crime. Him and his shitty music can get and stay in the sea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, zahidf said:

He didn't get a prison sentence and originally pleaded not guilty until the CCTV came out.

 

Zero sympathy. Community service is a joke for that crime. Him and his shitty music can get and stay in the sea

What good would locking him up do? How is locking him up in the publics interest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, eastynh said:

What good would locking him up do? How is locking him up in the publics interest?

Id say a prison sentence for a violent assault is perfectly reasonable. 

If under your circumstances, if it was someone working in the factory, he'd be in prison instead of whining to the papers about how unfair the consequences of his own actions are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, zahidf said:

He didn't get a prison sentence and originally pleaded not guilty until the CCTV came out.

 

Zero sympathy. Community service is a joke for that crime. Him and his shitty music can get and stay in the sea

What relevance does that have to the discussion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, eastynh said:

Hes lost his job, he has to do community service, he has been publicly shamed. What more do you want? Do you want to hang him? What good does locking him up do? Is he a danger to the public?

The fact that he beat the shit out of his partner in front of a child makes me think that yes, he most probably is a danger to the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Guy Incognito said:

The fact that he beat the shit out of his partner in front of a child makes me think that yes, he most probably is a danger to the public.

He was of previous good character and by accounts this was totally out of character. There is absolutely nothing to suggest he is a threat to the public.

There are 800000 convictions for domestic violence in the UK each year. We have a prison capacity of 90000. Seeing as we can't lock them all up, should we hang them all? It also costs £118 per day to keep a person in prison. Thats money which is coming out of mine and your pockets. Locking him up benefits neither of us.

It would be more beneficial to help rehabilitate him and sort his head out. Then make him go round schools and discuss his episode with final year students as part of his community service. He could discuss the dangers of alcohol misuse and domestic abuse. Seeing a fallen rock and roll star highlight serious issues will make more of an impact on impressional youngsters and some good may actually come from this. Or we could lock him in a cell for 23 hours a day, which benefits no one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eastynh said:

He was of previous good character and by accounts this was totally out of character. There is absolutely nothing to suggest he is a threat to the public.

There are 800000 convictions for domestic violence in the UK each year. We have a prison capacity of 90000. Seeing as we can't lock them all up, should we hang them all? It also costs £118 per day to keep a person in prison. Thats money which is coming out of mine and your pockets. Locking him up benefits neither of us.

It would be more beneficial to help rehabilitate him and sort his head out. Then make him go round schools and discuss his episode with final year students as part of his community service. He could discuss the dangers of alcohol misuse and domestic abuse. Seeing a fallen rock and roll star highlight serious issues will make more of an impact on impressional youngsters and some good may actually come from this. Or we could lock him in a cell for 23 hours a day, which benefits no one.

I'm not saying he should be locked up, but to claim he isn't a danger to the public is nonsense. If it can happen once, then it can happen again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, zahidf said:

He didn't get a prison sentence and originally pleaded not guilty until the CCTV came out.

 

Zero sympathy. Community service is a joke for that crime. Him and his shitty music can get and stay in the sea

Unfortunately your well-intentioned argument for punishment loses credibility by your obvious personal dislike for his music. It has no relevance within the context of this discussion at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m very much a believer that once someone has completed their sentence and has been rehabilitated to the degree specified by the courts they should be free to return to a normal life.

All you can hope is that he is fully rehabilitated and nothing like this ever happens again.

With regards to him continuing his career that is up to the general public. There’s nothing stopping him writing or releasing music, it’s up to individuals whether they choose to engage with it or not.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eastynh said:

Hes lost his job, he has to do community service, he has been publicly shamed. What more do you want? Do you want to hang him? What good does locking him up do? Is he a danger to the public? 

His missus has suggested the episide was nothing like the CPS has suggested and he has been stitched up. Seeing as his partner is not only the victim, but also the main witness, we have to give some credence to her statement.

Would he have lost his job if he worked in a factory? Probably not. Would he have been vilified on public forums if he had worked in Aldi? No he would not. So he has paid a bigger price than most. He has been made an example of due to his status.

He has admitted to his crime and accepted the punishment. By all accounts this seems an isolated episode and totally out of character. He has looked for help in relation to his alcohol use and seems to be taking steps to rebuild his life.

Domestic violence can never be excused and violence against women is abhorent. Yet the bloke does not deserve to be vilified for the rest of his days just for one indiscretion. 

His missus has forgiven him and he is trying to rehabilitate himself. Lets hope he emerges from this as a better person. 

I agree with that - and as far as I'm aware nothing is stopping him getting a job and getting on with his life - maybe in a factory or Aldi where he will be out of the public eye, as you mention.

Indeed, I'd say that's already happened. No-one had posted on this thread for months, no-one was vilifing him any more, he was pretty much an irrelevance. The only reason we are talking about him now is because he got a PR company to arrange a broadly sympathetic interview with a national paper in the hopes to start rehabilitating him in the public eye so he can have a career as a famous singer again.

He chose to put himself back in the public eye. This wasn't The Sun digging into his personal life, finding something controversial in it, and reigniting the story for another round of public shaming. This was his doing.

He's allowed a life. A nice low-key life with his bank full of money and continued royalties from his songs. But if he wants to be a public figure again, if he wants to famous, then yes, he will be judged in the court of public opinion, who may feel differently. No-one is owed the life of a rockstar just because they used to have the life of a rockstar. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

I agree with that - and as far as I'm aware nothing is stopping him getting a job and getting on with his life - maybe in a factory or Aldi where he will be out of the public eye, as you mention.

Indeed, I'd say that's already happened. No-one had posted on this thread for months, no-one was vilifing him any more, he was pretty much an irrelevance. The only reason we are talking about him now is because he got a PR company to arrange a broadly sympathetic interview with a national paper in the hopes to start rehabilitating him in the public eye so he can have a career as a famous singer again.

He chose to put himself back in the public eye. This wasn't The Sun digging into his personal life, finding something controversial in it, and reigniting the story for another round of public shaming. This was his doing.

He's allowed a life. A nice low-key life with his bank full of money and continued royalties from his songs. But if he wants to be a public figure again, if he wants to famous, then yes, he will be judged in the court of public opinion, who may feel differently. No-one is owed the life of a rockstar just because they used to have the life of a rockstar. 

I can't disagree with anything you have said there. He will be judged by his actions. People rightly have a negative opinion of him at present due to a horrible act. Violent acts against someone you say you love is absolutely disgusting. 

But, I have faith in people and hope he can redeem himself. He seems to be making small steps, but ultimately, actions speak louder than words.

The public will ultimaty judge him and his forgiveness will be measured in streams and tickets sold. I have not listened to the Smiths or Morrissey in years due to the continuous racist outburts. The public will do the same with the Kasabian singer.

I have no love for Kasabian and do not listen to their records. Yet, I hope this fella can turn his life around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, eastynh said:

I can't disagree with anything you have said there. He will be judged by his actions. People rightly have a negative opinion of him at present due to a horrible act. Violent acts against someone you say you love is absolutely disgusting. 

But, I have faith in people and hope he can redeem himself. He seems to be making small steps, but ultimately, actions speak louder than words.

The public will ultimaty judge him and his forgiveness will be measured in streams and tickets sold. I have not listened to the Smiths or Morrissey in years due to the continuous racist outburts. The public will do the same with the Kasabian singer.

I have no love for Kasabian and do not listen to their records. Yet, I hope this fella can turn his life around.

That's the thing though - if he remains in the public eye he will likely always be "the guy that used to be in Kasabian until he hit his wife".

I'd like to see him turn his life around too - but that won't be done by trying to get back into public life. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, henry bear said:

give it a few years of diminishing returns for both parties and Kasabian will welcome him back into the fold, citing "he's turned his life around" etc 

I reckon Serge could be one of those who becomes a songwriter for other people - he's clearly the talent in the band. I think any reunion would be from loyalty to the other members unless of course they can get into other bands, which I know does happen so maybe no need 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, eastynh said:

Everyone makes mistakes in life. He has paid a very high for his.

It seems like his 'attack' was out of character. His partner has forgiven him, so maybe it is time to give the fella a second chance.

 

On average high-risk victims live with domestic abuse for 2.3 years and medium risk victims for 3 years before getting help.

On average victims experience 50 incidents of abuse before getting effective help

 

Unlikely to be a one off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Copperface said:

 

On average high-risk victims live with domestic abuse for 2.3 years and medium risk victims for 3 years before getting help.

On average victims experience 50 incidents of abuse before getting effective help

 

Unlikely to be a one off.

Yet this missus said this is the first time it happened and his ex missus said there was not one episode of anything like this in the 5 years she was with him.

If there had been other episodes with other women, they would have come out bynow and gone to the media, the police, or been posting about it on social media.

I am not going to argue with your stats. In the case of celeberaties, things are a little difference to the norm. Because of the public profile, it seems to only take one to get the ball rolling.Just look at what happened to Hervey Weinstein. As of yet, there is absolutely nothing to suggest this was anything but a clearly disgusting isolated incident. There have been no murmurs of any other misdemeanours and you can bet your life that the media have been doing some digging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Copperface said:

 

On average high-risk victims live with domestic abuse for 2.3 years and medium risk victims for 3 years before getting help.

On average victims experience 50 incidents of abuse before getting effective help

 

Unlikely to be a one off.

Also, there is a long history of the victims saying that it was an isolated incident and that they want to drop the charges.............and then it happens again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • With more to come down the track 
    • Seems so!   sh*t.   This brings us almost to within a month of gates opening.  Wednesday 15 May - Friday 24 May Low pressure is expected to be dominant across the UK at the start of this period, bringing widely unsettled conditions. Most areas will be affected by showers, which could in a few places be heavy, slow-moving, with thunder and possibly hail, or even longer spells of rain at first   https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/forecast/uk#:~:text=Long range forecast,-Tuesday 14 May&text=The weather is expected to,much of the United Kingdom.
    • Now a trainline.com competition?  Definitely way more corporate partnership this year.
    • You are on point again this year I see fella 😀 
    • As resident Drake fan I've got to chime in here! Also a Kendrick fan of course, it's possible to be both. The whole beef is probably one of the few exciting events in mainstream US hip hop in recent years and certainly more of an event than both of their most recent albums... Firstly, Kendrick won the beef, but at what cost? Firstly there's the personal integrity question which is probably taking a big hit. At one point you could have posited him as the moral vanguard of hip hop but he's indulged conspiracy theorism in this (effectively and with a fair slice of humour, but conspiracy nonetheless) barrage of diss tracks, not to mention that he lapped up some deliberate BS fed by Drake's team and put it in a song. Obviously Mr. Morale itself goes some way towards distancing himself from the saintly projection from fans, the media and the world at large, but in the diss tracks he is adopting a 'we the people' voice and airing out the grievances and theories of drake haters worldwide and it must be cathartic for all of them. And he's good at it, but lets not confuse what he's doing here with some of his Pulitzer work.  .  And then of course the accusation that he beat his fiancee up and hired a crisis management team to clear it up is a pretty heavy one and you know, quite a long way away from "Godspeed for women's rights". Thirdly, he didn't really attempt to answer any questions about his own affairs, which is fine for now, he had plenty of mud to sling at Drake, and a world ready to listen, but someone will come for him one day and he won't have the same ammo to respond with and I guess that might be tactical victory, strategic failure. But he can still rely on being able to outrap nearly anyone else. For Drake, obviously it's been a pretty bruising encounter, especially because Kendrick used his own playbook against him in terms of how the beef played out with back to back releases and even a catchy club tune that will get singalongs all summer. But Drake's disses were pretty solid, well constructed and well rapped with lots of points scored and if he couldn't land a decisive blow against Kendrick, he certainly made the other co-ordinated agitators (Future, MetroBoomin, The Weeknd) look pretty silly. Rick Ross is now the old man angry at clouds meme.   It's likely that both achieve extended relevance from this spat based on the streaming numbers. Drake is like Taylor Swift in that he releases music at an astonishing rate. I can't see this really making a significant dent in that cadence but hopefully it might inspire something better than his dull recent output. Kendrick hasn't done numbers like this for a while. It's a bit annoying that like 'Humble', it's his worst tracks that cut through (I'm calling 'Not like us' garbage, sorry.)   There's an element of proof in the pudding for Drake in the fact that this beef is happening at all. In terms of motivation for Kendrick starting this beef, he clearly just wanted to prove he's number 1, responding to Drake & J.Cole's track "First Person Shooter" last year. Why is Kendrick so bothered? Why does he have this visceral hatred of all things Aubrey? Why has he thrown the absolute kitchen sink at him, noting every personal grievance, every rumour and conspiracy and even bringing family into it and throwing some pretty questionable racial politics into the mix? It's not an act of benevolence to the wider world but an attempt to see off a rival and be crowned the undisputed best rapper alive. To do that he had to defeat Drake, and throw it all on the line to do so. Would and should Drake play Glastonbury? The most obvious point is he fulfils most of the objective-ish criteria that gets bandied about on here to evaluate whether an act is a suitable headliner. One of the most commercially successful artists of recent times, a number of critically acclaimed releases, sellout arena tours and number one records. Arguably he's the rap equivalent of Coldplay - a mega artist who has evolved his music over the years in accordance with the trends of the time rather than imposing his artistic vision upon the world, and generally having what would be considered a broad rather than deep appeal. Obviously a lot of people think Coldplay are shite but few argue their credentials to headline. His creative peak was the middle years of the last decade with a number of great releases from 2012 through to 2018ish. Take Care (2012) and Nothing Was The Same (2014) are classic rap albums for me, the sort that have sadly died out. Scorpion was probably the turning point where, there were more stinkers than solid ones, but a bit like Taylor Swift's most recent album, a curated playlist picking out an hours worth of material from the record would make a very decent album. He's clearly far from a terrible rapper too, although he is prone to having many songs based around a similar subject matter and hasn't demonstrated lots of artistic growth from the early years.   I'd say we're probably now entering the era where he could play. Whether he would be booked is another matter as I'd say mainstream opinion in the UK would be dead against it. But as far as the economics around it are concerned, I think he could become a festival sized act again, in the same way that Taylor Swift is probably 'above' festival sized right now.    
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...