Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, jimmillen said:

Spot on. This is the point everyone needs to accept: going for full steam ahead & reopening is a gamble.

From everything I’ve read, the odds are in our favour - vaccines seem to work against variants. And I can’t argue that there’s many economic and wellbeing benefits to reopening. 

But, but but… If the dice come up wrong then we’re fucked. 🤷‍♂️

We’ll just have to hang on for the ride and see where we are in a few months. I really hope we get away with it!

This virus wasn't just like flu like people were saying at the beginning, but the vaccines have now made it much more like flu, and something we can live with...(hopefully).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, st dan said:

I agree with you, but you have to accept that us being susceptible to a virus (whether that be a mutation of Covid or new one entirely) is part and parcel of living on this planet. The scenario you have mentioned is no different to how things were pre Covid life, and its how we got here into this mess in the first place. If we want to live and interact, then the risks will always be there. 

 

27 minutes ago, jimmillen said:

Spot on. This is the point everyone needs to accept: going for full steam ahead & reopening is a gamble.

From everything I’ve read, the odds are in our favour - vaccines seem to work against variants. And I can’t argue that there’s many economic and wellbeing benefits to reopening. 

But, but but… If the dice come up wrong then we’re fucked. 🤷‍♂️

We’ll just have to hang on for the ride and see where we are in a few months. I really hope we get away with it!

 

24 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

The alternative options are no less of a gamble and this is something you seem to choose to ignore.

Its not like its justifiable or even a realistic option to stay nice and locked up forever.

Yeah I think my point was a bit lost in that - less saying we should stay locked up and more along the lines of we really need this variant fear in the media to stop. If a bad one comes up there's literally nothing we can do about it and while I'd expect plans in place from the top, scaring the public daily with potential bad ones isn't going to help anyone when there are no restrictions to mitigate them. We only need to know at the point there is a confirmed issue (if that happens)

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, jannybruck said:

I work in recruitment and the genie is out of the bottle in terms of WFH – already we're seeing huge amounts of people shifting jobs and prioritising ones that offer either flexible working/hybrid/etc. One of the first questions people are asking now is if the business has WFH options.

Even if they're forcing people back in this year, companies will need to adapt long term or face a serious brain drain, basically.

I turned down a job last week partly because although they had flexible working it wasn't at all guaranteed. Job ad said "2-3 days a month in the office" but I could have been in the office zero days one month and 20 days the next. The employer lied through their teeth in the ad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

 

Yeah I think my point was a bit lost in that - less saying we should stay locked up and more along the lines of we really need this variant fear in the media to stop. If a bad one comes up there's literally nothing we can do about it and while I'd expect plans in place from the top, scaring the public daily with potential bad ones isn't going to help anyone when there are no restrictions to mitigate them. We only need to know at the point there is a confirmed issue (if that happens)

Ah, OK yeah I misunderstood - my bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.thumb.png.2c2cdca2fb5c33875426c81f15550dc1.png

Granted it’s only 3 counties to compare with, but an interesting graph nonetheless. Guess it goes some way to explain why our cases as so much higher than these are currently reporting. 
Not to go all Trump, but obviously it’s a case of the more you test the more cases you’ll find.

Edited by st dan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, st dan said:

image.thumb.png.2c2cdca2fb5c33875426c81f15550dc1.png

Granted it’s only 3 counties to compare with, but an interesting graph nonetheless. Guess it goes some way to explain why our cases as so much higher than these are currently reporting. 

Weird labelling - why are UK & Italy “tests performed” v France & Japan “people tested”? 

Assume they mean the same thing but if so why not use the same terminology? 

Sorry, will rein in my inner data pedant now… 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jimmillen said:

Weird labelling - why are UK & Italy “tests performed” v France & Japan “people tested”? 

Assume they mean the same thing but if so why not use the same terminology? 

Sorry, will rein in my inner data pedant now… 😂

I don't know if this is the correct answer or not - but just in terms of taking the words on face value, it could be that in the UK and Italy one person could theoretically have had more than one test in a given day, whereas in France and Japan that'd be logged as a single entry?

Though that's a minor enough difference it won't impact the figures more than a percentage or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yep - should have been the Stones.
    • Yeah I do agree on the 2 hour thing. But if they were subbed by Biffy/WA only doing 75 mins or so would be doable.   Only reason I suggested them was because we know they're back doing shows here next year. 
    • Its probably the culmination of issues that have been simmering under the surface for a while. Spain ran a regularisation program recently that allows undocumented individuals to obtain temporary legal status and then a route to EU citizenship. 1.2 million applied. At the same time Montenegro is having to close its citizenship via investment program as part of EU ascension talks.    Countries are obviously asking, why are we having to reject investors whilst others can wave anyone in?
    • I'm not sure, they aren't giving any headliner in that format 2hours and Foos would have at least 2. I wouldn't say Reading is likely for them next year either. If they are as said going big on a tour with stadiums and festivals then the UK is once place they can definitely do stadiums and that would rule them out. And that's even if they come back for a second UK stint as I fully expect them in Europe from very early. That could be seen as hyperthetical but there are is some places I cannot see them not doing from history.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...