Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Copperface said:

Not again surely. Been through it several times. The situation has not changed. 

As for the Republic's vax programme, very different - a total population of under 5 million (ish?) and a total vaccination number of what, 2.5 to 3 million, and an urgent/vulnerable number of one/two million?........not even remotely comparable.

I know there’s a 12-13 fold difference in population, but there’s a pretty big difference in your infrastructure too, on a per capita basis, we’re pretty comparable...as I said, I understand it’s a big logistical challenge. I just prefer to think we can do it (and I don’t think it’s gullible or deluded). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

To be fair to Copperface if the NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens confirmed all vulnerable groups would be vaccinated by late spring. Then it's not exactly beyond the realms if possibility that all over-50s wouldn't be vaccinated by mid-Summer.

That was before the dosing change though?

Also, he was stating it as a fact with glee that it wouldn't be happening until mid summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Losing my hair said:

With the Oxford/AZ vaccine now online I'm assuming that the pinch point will be production, batch checking etc rather than the actual delivery into the arm. 

There are 50 million shots to be administered into 25 million defined as the first phase group. We have a current stockpile of of about 500, 000 AZ doses. AZ themselves say they 'may' be able to deliver 'up to' 2 million doses per month. 

The NHS have a target of 1 million vaccinations per week. The Government have an 'internal ambition' of two million per week.

Let's optimistically split those targets and settle on 1.5 million per week.

That's 33 weeks just for two shots to what is classed as the first phase vulnerable. That's August straight off. 2 million per week is 25 weeks (mid June). That's at full chat, no disruptions, and only assumes that all is well once 'the vulnerable' have been administered the vaccine. Does not take into account the 10-15 % who will not be protected by it due to efficacy, nor the other significant amount (15%) who are politely known as 'vaccine hesitant' (or numpties). The spread and transmission is almost as important as hospital/admission/mortality rates. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Copperface said:

There are 50 million shots to be administered into 25 million defined as the first phase group. We have a current stockpile of of about 500, 000 AZ doses. AZ themselves say they 'may' be able to deliver 'up to' 2 million doses per month. 

The NHS have a target of 1 million vaccinations per week. The Government have an 'internal ambition' of two million per week.

Let's optimistically split those targets and settle on 1.5 million per week.

That's 33 weeks just for two shots to what is classed as the first phase vulnerable. That's August straight off. 2 million per week is 25 weeks (mid June). That's at full chat, no disruptions, and only assumes that all is well once 'the vulnerable' have been administered the vaccine. Does not take into account the 10-15 % who will not be protected by it due to efficacy, nor the other significant amount (15%) who are politely known as 'vaccine hesitant' (or numpties). The spread and transmission is almost as important as hospital/admission/mortality rates. 

 

Ignoring Pfizer of course I see and Moderna whenever that is approved. And potentially J and J. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zahidf said:

Ignoring Pfizer of course I see and Moderna whenever that is approved. And potentially J and J. 

Delivery is the main bottleneck, and that has to run perfectly in sync with a constant uninterrupted supply. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Copperface said:

There are 50 million shots to be administered into 25 million defined as the first phase group. We have a current stockpile of of about 500, 000 AZ doses. AZ themselves say they 'may' be able to deliver 'up to' 2 million doses per month. 

The NHS have a target of 1 million vaccinations per week. The Government have an 'internal ambition' of two million per week.

Let's optimistically split those targets and settle on 1.5 million per week.

That's 33 weeks just for two shots to what is classed as the first phase vulnerable. That's August straight off. 2 million per week is 25 weeks (mid June). That's at full chat, no disruptions, and only assumes that all is well once 'the vulnerable' have been administered the vaccine. Does not take into account the 10-15 % who will not be protected by it due to efficacy, nor the other significant amount (15%) who are politely known as 'vaccine hesitant' (or numpties). The spread and transmission is almost as important as hospital/admission/mortality rates. 

 

Good on you for going into detail and providing your rationale behind your post!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

He has before, it’s possible, but rather pessimistic (though obviously, it’s a massive logistical challenge). If it was a typo it would be closer to the truth (under 50s in the summer, rather than over 50s). 

Yeah, sorry, should have been clearer -  I meant completion of the programme for any over 50s + priority groups or first phase, however you term it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this talk of easter is absolute shit- just to keep people compliant longer. They know if they said how long this was actually going to last (along with the chance of people being able to do LESS in 2021 than 2020 due to not being vaccinated yet e.g. holidays) then compliance would disappear and the next few months for the NHS would be worse

This country has a government that takes Christmas and bank holidays off during a crisis, and when approving a vaccine today has said it would start being used on Monday the 4th. 5 days away, because of traditional times and dates (bank holidays and working hours). It doesnt bode well- it will clearly be 5 days a week, mainly business hours. 

This is a major emergency situation and that vaccine should be started being used tomorrow and should be rolling at least 12 hours a day with shift patterns til its done. But this country is steeped in tradition and it'll take a lot longer than it should 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Copperface said:

There are 50 million shots to be administered into 25 million defined as the first phase group. We have a current stockpile of of about 500, 000 AZ doses. AZ themselves say they 'may' be able to deliver 'up to' 2 million doses per month. 

The NHS have a target of 1 million vaccinations per week. The Government have an 'internal ambition' of two million per week.

Let's optimistically split those targets and settle on 1.5 million per week.

That's 33 weeks just for two shots to what is classed as the first phase vulnerable. That's August straight off. 2 million per week is 25 weeks (mid June). That's at full chat, no disruptions, and only assumes that all is well once 'the vulnerable' have been administered the vaccine. Does not take into account the 10-15 % who will not be protected by it due to efficacy, nor the other significant amount (15%) who are politely known as 'vaccine hesitant' (or numpties). The spread and transmission is almost as important as hospital/admission/mortality rates. 

 

don’t forget you’ve quoted here 25 million people getting two doses, do the same maths for the one does if the government are seeing that as adequate interim protection and it’s half that 16.5 weeks (4 months) - 4 months to April

i know there will become a point where there is overlap with the 1st and 2nd dosers which will slow things down so I take it with a pinch of salt.

Do I think they will achieve this, no, but I think it will be somewhere in between the 16.5 and 33 weeks that the government ‘declares victory’, and as mentioned above, May is still spring...

Despite what they said tonight, I do agree with you though, I think there will come a point where delivery is the bottleneck purely judging on what I’ve seen over the last 10 months and nothing more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Copperface said:

There are 50 million shots to be administered into 25 million defined as the first phase group. We have a current stockpile of of about 500, 000 AZ doses. AZ themselves say they 'may' be able to deliver 'up to' 2 million doses per month. 

Are you sure you aren’t mixing up the delivery schedule for Pfizer with AZ? AZ have said they expect to deliver 40m doses to the UK before the end of March. I was talking to one of the leads last week and he said they expected 3-4.5bn doses of their vaccine available in 2021 (obviously a lot of these are being made by SII and not for the UK/EU/US market). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

Are you sure you aren’t mixing up the delivery schedule for Pfizer with AZ? AZ have said they expect to deliver 40m doses to the UK before the end of March. I was talking to one of the leads last week and he said they expected 3-4.5bn doses of their vaccine available in 2021 (obviously a lot of these are being made by SII and not for the UK/EU/US market). 

No. Pascal Soriot - from the horses mouth.

Talking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, its chief executive, Pascal Soriot, said the company could provide the UK with as many as 2m doses a week and would start shipping the first doses “today or tomorrow”.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/dec/30/oxford-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-approved-by-uk-regulator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

Are you sure you aren’t mixing up the delivery schedule for Pfizer with AZ? AZ have said they expect to deliver 40m doses to the UK before the end of March. I was talking to one of the leads last week and he said they expected 3-4.5bn doses of their vaccine available in 2021 (obviously a lot of these are being made by SII and not for the UK/EU/US market). 

No this surprised me too during the brief, a lot less than I was expecting but they did quote approx 500k ready to go next week - I don’t know why, maybe something I misread but I thought it was around 2m that we should have by year end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, rascalpete said:

No this surprised me too during the brief, a lot less than I was expecting but they did quote approx 500k ready to go next week - I don’t know why, maybe something I misread but I thought it was around 2m that we should have by year end

Yep. I was under the impression that we had a massive stockpile due to the parallel 'assessment/manufacture' policy. 

ie I thought they had produced massive amounts and the UK had it available even before it was approved,as a gamble, but that if it paid off we would never be constrained by supply. Obviously wrong.

UK has committed to and ordered 100 million AZ doses, but order to be completed by year's end....that works out averaged out at 2m per week.

 

Edited by Copperface
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Copperface said:

Yep. I was under the impression that we had a massive stockpile due to the parallel 'assessment/manufacture' policy. 

ie I thought they had produced massive amounts and the UK had it available even before it was approved,as a gamble, but that if it paid off we would never be constrained by supply. Obviously wrong.

UK has committed to and ordered 100 million AZ doses, but order to be completed by year's end....that works out averaged out at 2m per week.

 

Fair enough (though maybe Oxford and AZ have different expectations!)...that’s still over 20m doses though, 2nd shot delivered in Q2...plus Pfizer, Moderna and maybe others? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

Fair enough (though maybe Oxford and AZ have different expectations!)...that’s still over 20m doses though, 2nd shot delivered in Q2...plus Pfizer, Moderna and maybe others? 

Who knows?

But the government have been asked on multiple occasions about a projected, likely and realistic vaccination timetable for a defined section of the population- - not once have they accurately answered that question. Just vague waffle , although that seems to satisfy some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, funkychick2007 said:

Who are they planning is going to do the testing in schools it shouldn’t be teachers!! 

They haven't made that bit clear, possibly Army or the Reserves.

It can't be put on the teachers, they've had to deal with so much already and have done such a good job that they don't need that added stress too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Copperface said:

No. Pascal Soriot - from the horses mouth.

Talking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, its chief executive, Pascal Soriot, said the company could provide the UK with as many as 2m doses a week and would start shipping the first doses “today or tomorrow”.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/dec/30/oxford-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-approved-by-uk-regulator

Spaffer and Hancock keep talking about this vaccine being a ‘Great British science success story’. Guess they’ll be pissed when they find out the chief executive, Pascal, is French.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

All this talk of easter is absolute shit- just to keep people compliant longer. They know if they said how long this was actually going to last (along with the chance of people being able to do LESS in 2021 than 2020 due to not being vaccinated yet e.g. holidays) then compliance would disappear and the next few months for the NHS would be worse

This country has a government that takes Christmas and bank holidays off during a crisis, and when approving a vaccine today has said it would start being used on Monday the 4th. 5 days away, because of traditional times and dates (bank holidays and working hours). It doesnt bode well- it will clearly be 5 days a week, mainly business hours. 

This is a major emergency situation and that vaccine should be started being used tomorrow and should be rolling at least 12 hours a day with shift patterns til its done. But this country is steeped in tradition and it'll take a lot longer than it should 

Well people aren't going to follow it much longer. Past March, I wouldn't expect young people to give a crap about household mixing if the fuck up is with govt vaccine roll out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

They haven't made that bit clear, possibly Army or the Reserves.

It can't be put on the teachers, they've had to deal with so much already and have done such a good job that they don't need that added stress too.

Aren’t the army essentially being used as call centre support?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

All this talk of easter is absolute shit- just to keep people compliant longer. They know if they said how long this was actually going to last (along with the chance of people being able to do LESS in 2021 than 2020 due to not being vaccinated yet e.g. holidays) then compliance would disappear and the next few months for the NHS would be worse

This country has a government that takes Christmas and bank holidays off during a crisis, and when approving a vaccine today has said it would start being used on Monday the 4th. 5 days away, because of traditional times and dates (bank holidays and working hours). It doesnt bode well- it will clearly be 5 days a week, mainly business hours. 

This is a major emergency situation and that vaccine should be started being used tomorrow and should be rolling at least 12 hours a day with shift patterns til its done. But this country is steeped in tradition and it'll take a lot longer than it should 

Disagree about the 5 days a week. I had my flu jab on a Saturday. No way will it be different for the covid jab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...