Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, kalifire said:

In a sense, it doesn’t matter who’s to blame (the government for not pointing out what should be an obvious caveat, or the people who didn’t grasp that). The wider issue is that if a short lockdown extension can prevent unnecessary harm, people should stop being so entitled and suck it up for a few more weeks. They’ll still get the majority of summer, ffs. 

I think there is a lot of understandable distrust that it will just be a few more weeks...that it will end up going on for longer than that...and they can't guarantee that it won't...but if after a few more weeks they say a few more weeks after that, and then a few more weeks after that..the anger is just going to build and build and it could get very messy.

Saying that, I really think the vaccines are going to do the biz this summer, we just possibly need to stop cases getting too high while we keep jabbing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MrBarry465 said:

With the way the climate is going, you will be glad to know summer is likely extended into September/October. So not all doom and gloom 🙂

True that .. it was 22 degrees when I got married in mid October in 2018. And I payed the heavily reduced ‘winter’ price package too. Result! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, st dan said:

That’s why they need to say that a four week delay will lead to ‘x’ more people have their second vaccine, plus ‘y’ more younger people having their first dose, which means that we predict ‘xyz’ will happen to hospitalisations and deaths. 

Agreed. The comms has been woeful throughout. It’s all predicated on political grandstanding. The old Tory obsession with power at the expense of all else, population and health service be damned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, balthazarstarbuck said:

Mrs Starbuck has a couple of friends like this, and it’s very frustrating. No real reasons, just more of a “I’ll do it when I get round to it after everyone else” kind of attitude.

Neither are getting an invite to our flat until they’re at least booked in. 

Are you and Mrs Starbucks vaccinated?

 

If so I’d VERY interested to understand your reasoning behind the bolded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MrBarry465 said:

A. Yes https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/oct/10/young-people-drinking-alcohol-study-england

B. I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that festivals will change. I mean people rarely club these days, pre covid I am saying. It's not unreasonable to assume that Music Festivals might scale down.

People rarely club these days? Sorry, what? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, MrBarry465 said:

A. Yes https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/oct/10/young-people-drinking-alcohol-study-england

B. I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that festivals will change. I mean people rarely club these days, pre covid I am saying. It's not unreasonable to assume that Music Festivals might scale down.

Thanks for providing your source. Interesting trend for sure.

 

On the festivals thing, what do you mean people “rarely club”. Plenty of 18-24 year olds are out clubbing every weekend, especially students. 
 

Even still, clubbing basically revolves around drinking (and pingers tbf) whereas festivals are for music fans with the optional extra of drinking. If a young music fan who regularly attends festivals decides to stop drinking, do you really think this will prevent them going to the festival at all? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stuie said:

People rarely club these days? Sorry, what? 

This really isn't new news?

Nighclub revenue has been falling for quite some time and particularly when i was living in London - lots of closures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MrBarry465 said:

This really isn't new news?

Nighclub revenue has been falling for quite some time and particularly when i was living in London - lots of closures.

If you mean that people are going to fancy Be at One type places as opposed to XOYO then you’re right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fuzzy Afro said:

If you mean that people are going to fancy Be at One type places as opposed to XOYO then you’re right. 

I think a lot of nightclubs are going to have to reinvent themselves to remain profitable when things return to 'normal'.

For instance, live streaming of a club night / DJ set. Even when clubs open, i really think a lot of them should offer a paid version of the event you can watch at home, just to get that extra revenue coming in.

Same with Glastonbury, would people for instance - pay for a weekend pass to the festival to watch it all? I've tried to get tickets multiple times over the past few years and miss out, but would still love an all access pass to stream it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

Are you and Mrs Starbucks vaccinated?

 

If so I’d VERY interested to understand your reasoning behind the bolded. 

At this point? Mostly the principle. 
Every person who drags their heels when offered a jab without good reason is slowing us getting back to normal.

 

Edited by balthazarstarbuck
Nuance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MrBarry465 said:

I think a lot of nightclubs are going to have to reinvent themselves to remain profitable when things return to 'normal'.

For instance, live streaming of a club night / DJ set. Even when clubs open, i really think a lot of them should offer a paid version of the event you can watch at home, just to get that extra revenue coming in.

Same with Glastonbury, would people for instance - pay for a weekend pass to the festival to watch it all? I've tried to get tickets multiple times over the past few years and miss out, but would still love an all access pass to stream it. 

Yeah I think we must live on different planets.

No idea why anyone would pay for watching a club night at home.

Likewise with Glasto, tonnes of it is on BBC anyway 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, balthazarstarbuck said:

At this point? Mostly the principle. 
Every person who drags their heels when offered a jab without good reason is slowing us getting back to normal.

 

Very valid point, and I’d fully encourage everyone to get vaccinated when you get the call for that exact reason.

 

I’m lucky enough that I’m yet to encounter an anti-vaxxer in my own family and friendship groups however if I did, I’m not going to avoid inviting them in to my flat given that I’m already vaccinated. I have enough trust in my vaccine to protect me without having to limit myself to only mingling with other vaccinated people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, kalifire said:

Because they were foolish enough to expect people to understand that if variants unknown at that time cause differing statistics, that will change the equation.

They underestimated the number of people who’d say “bUT YoU sAiD jUnE 21sT!!1”

How has the equation changed? Please point to evidence that we should be concerned other than saying cases are rising. Very simple question which alot people won't answer 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

Yeah I think we must live on different planets.

No idea why anyone would pay for watching a club night at home.

Likewise with Glasto, tonnes of it is on BBC anyway 

Yeah we must do, because I am a massive music head and stream a lot of sets. But unfortuntlay I am based in Bristol and can't nip down to say an Amsterdam nightclub can I? I'm equally there to watch a music set as well as be in the club itself. That's literally like saying, 'why would you watch football at home when you can go to a game'......

Also dude, it's not an either or scenario is it? If you literally cannot get to a club but want to see the set, why would you limit people?

BBCs coverage of Glasto is shit these days. I'd happily pay to get proper coverage of any set I wanted.

Regardless, I think you will find a lot of clubs and places go down that route anyway.

Edited by MrBarry465
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, aj6658 said:

How has the equation changed? Please point to evidence that we should be concerned other than saying cases are rising. Very simple question which alot people won't answer 

 

 

 

variant more infectious, and single dose quite a lot less effective against it, and double dose a bit less effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

Very valid point, and I’d fully encourage everyone to get vaccinated when you get the call for that exact reason.

 

I’m lucky enough that I’m yet to encounter an anti-vaxxer in my own family and friendship groups however if I did, I’m not going to avoid inviting them in to my flat given that I’m already vaccinated. I have enough trust in my vaccine to protect me without having to limit myself to only mingling with other vaccinated people. 

We’ve got 3 jabs between us (4 tomorrow!)- so it’s not a fear about getting ill. It’s more the selfish “well I’m probably gonna be fine even if i get it” attitude, rather than acknowledging you might have wider obligations to society at large on this to prevent transmission to some poor bastard who falls through the cracks on this, especially when the third world is crying out for jabs.
 

Mrs S was also on one of the trials, so is taking it a bit personally when people refuse them once they’ve gone through medical approval.

Edited by balthazarstarbuck
Forgot something
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, balthazarstarbuck said:

We’ve got 3 jabs between us (4 tomorrow!)- so it’s not a fear about getting ill. It’s more the selfish “well I’m probably gonna be fine even if i get it” attitude, rather than acknowledging you might have wider obligations to society at large on this to prevent transmission to some poor bastard who falls through the cracks on this. 

I wasn't overly concerned about myself to be honest - I had COVID last year and while tough I pulled through. However, given some of the news on the new variant I aint taking chances and am going to get jabbed on Friday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

variant more infectious, and single dose quite a lot less effective against it, and double dose a bit less effective.

99% of deaths are in groups 1 -9 which are double dosed - if you are young you are not at risk ( Number of people below 30  who have died from COVID is tiny- less than 0.02%)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, aj6658 said:

99% of deaths are in groups 1 -9 which are double dosed - if you are young you are not at risk ( Number of people below 30  who have died from COVID is tiny- less than 0.02%)

 

If cases get high enough then get to unvaccinated could still get a lot of death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

If cases get high enough then get to unvaccinated could still get a lot of death.

Absolutely. To quote everyone’s favourite corona centrist, a small percentage of a big number can still be quite a big number.

And that’s not doubting the vaccines. That’s saying something in 90s is not 100 percent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...