Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, priest17 said:

Convinced myself I had it (again) bity it was just exposure to far too much alcohol. They need to crack on with a whisky hangover vaccine now they've got a bit of time on their hands!

When I had it back in February I thought it was just a bad comedown after a few heavy weeks and didn’t think much of it, other than finding it strange my taste was off. 
 

Was only a few months later after doing an antibody test I realised I had it! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

I couldn't care less what the bizarre clique on here think of me.. least of all you lol.

I called out some shameless hypocrisy and seem to have upset a lot of people with it. I am content with the fact that I am obviously in the right and clearly everyone agrees the guy is a hypocrite.

For what it's worth, I found it an odd statement given the debate around a trip overseas or not. 

Personally I couldn't care less who breaks rules, doesn't break rules, who wants to live like this forever or who doesn't. My mantra throughout has been I will abide by the rules so long as I feel they make sense as I want to return to somewhere near normality as soon as it possible. To date, I've not always liked the rules but they make sense and I've abided by them. 

What I really struggle with is folk who string others up for breaking the rules but pick and choose when they apply to them I'm not suggesting any rules have been broken here, and if they have I don't really care just own it. Obviously I would have a problem with some rules being broken e.g. coughing in people's faces.

Death is coming to us all at somepoint and people die every day. People will keep dying of Covid even after a vaccine and even after the rules are lifted or relaxed.

We all roll the dice every day. 

We will all die of something some day. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

For what it's worth, I found it an odd statement given the debate around a trip overseas or not. 

Personally I couldn't care less who breaks rules, doesn't break rules, who wants to live like this forever or who doesn't. My mantra throughout has been I will abide by the rules so long as I feel they make sense as I want to return to somewhere near normality as soon as it possible. To date, I've not always liked the rules but they make sense and I've abided by them. 

What I really struggle with is folk who string others up for breaking the rules but pick and choose when they apply to them I'm not suggesting any rules have been broken here, and if they have I don't really care just own it. Obviously I would have a problem with some rules being broken e.g. coughing in people's faces.

Death is coming to us all at somepoint and people die every day. People will keep dying of Covid even after a vaccine and even after the rules are lifted or relaxed.

We all roll the dice every day. 

We will all die of something some day. 

 

 

Sounds like a Flaming Lips song

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ace56blaa said:

From the amount of pages this morning alone with very little new information. I guess everyone has finished playing with their Xmas presents?

Someone didn’t get a PS5 for Christmas 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

@crazyfool1 Any update on that guy at your work and the situation in general?

just spoken to my boss and the person concerned developed symptoms after they went home on wed .... and I haven't worked since wed .... so hopefully the timing was good in terms of spread ... but it has given them a kick up the ass though ... will see what face mask usage is like tomorow .... and my boss is going to tell me if we get anymore confirmed cases and is happy for me to use some holiday last minute if I need to 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. Back to business.

Is there any chance that Christmas transmission may be lower than expected? I’m going to give anecdotal evidence here but from the people in my family / I know virtually everyone has stayed behind very closed doors this Christmas. Even those which travelled / escaped London it’s not like they’ve been about.

Apart from solo country walks I’ve not interacted with anyone else but my household. I can’t imagine hundreds have descended on tier 2 pubs either - or I haven’t seen much evidence of it.

Yes there may be some household mixing issues but even people I know that I would categorise as frequent rule breakers seem to have been quite well behaved this Christmas. 

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Matt42 said:

Right. Back to business.

Is there any chance that Christmas transmission may be lower than expected? I’m going to give anecdotal evidence here but from the people in my family / I know virtually everyone has stayed behind very closed doors this Christmas. Even those which travelled / escaped London it’s not like they’ve been about.

Apart from solo country walks I’ve not interacted with anyone else but my household. I can’t imagine hundreds have descended on tier 2 pubs either - or I haven’t seen much evidence of it.

Yes there may be some household mixing issues but even people I know that I would categorise as frequent rule breakers seem to have been quiet well behaved this Christmas. 

There was a poll in the daily fail which said loads of people had given up on mixing over Xmas. Fingers crossed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Right. Back to business.

Is there any chance that Christmas transmission may be lower than expected? I’m going to give anecdotal evidence here but from the people in my family / I know virtually everyone has stayed behind very closed doors this Christmas. Even those which travelled / escaped London it’s not like they’ve been about.

Apart from solo country walks I’ve not interacted with anyone else but my household. I can’t imagine hundreds have descended on tier 2 pubs either - or I haven’t seen much evidence of it.

Yes there may be some household mixing issues but even people I know that I would categorise as frequent rule breakers seem to have been quite well behaved this Christmas. 

Im hoping this gives us a chance along with schools being closed and some areas already in Tier 4 ... fingers very firmly crossed though ... im not so sure its going to work ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Can only speak for myself and my family but none of us have seen anyone. We've not mixed with anyone since December 2nd in fact and that was outdoors.

I went for a walk with my parents yesterday .... distanced , whilst wearing a mask and obviously outside .... thats it though apart from work 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s been a mix among my family and friends,  some cancelled plans, many stayed in their own bubble but there were some who had a mixing indoors kind of Christmas. So I think there’ll be some kind of Christmas related spike especially if the new variant is involved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, zahidf said:

I actually think this may happen in March/April when more and more vaccinations happen, and by May onwards it'll be no restrictions. 

That’s how I see it. Depressingly I think it may all happen too late for Glastonbury but I can survive another year without the Big G if my kids can see their Grandparents again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Right. Back to business.

Is there any chance that Christmas transmission may be lower than expected? I’m going to give anecdotal evidence here but from the people in my family / I know virtually everyone has stayed behind very closed doors this Christmas. Even those which travelled / escaped London it’s not like they’ve been about.

Apart from solo country walks I’ve not interacted with anyone else but my household. I can’t imagine hundreds have descended on tier 2 pubs either - or I haven’t seen much evidence of it.

Yes there may be some household mixing issues but even people I know that I would categorise as frequent rule breakers seem to have been quite well behaved this Christmas. 

Nailed on there will be an Xmas spike. Question is how big will it be. 

I saw a lot of walking dead* yesterday at the light illuminations at our local zoo - lots of family's with granny and grandad in tow.

Lots of families that seem to consist of 1 kid and 4 adults or maybe they are just the parents friends. It's upto them but all these choices impact the numbers that impact us all. 

At least it was outside and it was very good. A particular highlight was playing a roaring lion sound behind my partner in a nice dark area near the lion enclosure, she jumped out of her skin.

 

*I'm aware Covid isn't a death sentence and just seen granny and grandad won't give them Covid. Just playing on the theme some portray that seeing granny and grandad is signing their death sentence. 

Edited by RobertProsineckisLighter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Right. Back to business.

Is there any chance that Christmas transmission may be lower than expected? I’m going to give anecdotal evidence here but from the people in my family / I know virtually everyone has stayed behind very closed doors this Christmas. Even those which travelled / escaped London it’s not like they’ve been about.

Apart from solo country walks I’ve not interacted with anyone else but my household. I can’t imagine hundreds have descended on tier 2 pubs either - or I haven’t seen much evidence of it.

Yes there may be some household mixing issues but even people I know that I would categorise as frequent rule breakers seem to have been quite well behaved this Christmas. 

Out of my own straw poll of 17 people (across 3 different cities and all sorts of occupations) 15 were still planning to meet up at Christmas though none were in particularly big numbers. Thanksgiving in the States didn’t accelerate growth there according to the Beeb so you never know it may not be too bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Right. Back to business.

Is there any chance that Christmas transmission may be lower than expected? I’m going to give anecdotal evidence here but from the people in my family / I know virtually everyone has stayed behind very closed doors this Christmas. Even those which travelled / escaped London it’s not like they’ve been about.

Apart from solo country walks I’ve not interacted with anyone else but my household. I can’t imagine hundreds have descended on tier 2 pubs either - or I haven’t seen much evidence of it.

Yes there may be some household mixing issues but even people I know that I would categorise as frequent rule breakers seem to have been quite well behaved this Christmas. 

Nearly everyone i know, except myself mixed where I am. 

One of my friends went round a friends house for xmas, and after they had already got there and mixed, got a positive test, have no idea why they went round before getting results. And most of these people who mixed are people who wouldn't mix in a lockdown for the most part, so anecdotally i don't think it'll be that much less than anticipated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ace56blaa said:

Nearly everyone i know, except myself mixed where I am. 

One of my friends went round a friends house for xmas, and after they had already got there and mixed, got a positive test, have no idea why they went round before getting results. And most of these people who mixed are people who wouldn't mix in a lockdown for the most part, so anecdotally i don't think it'll be that much less than anticipated

Damn. That’s not great. 
 

Seems to be a mixed bag then. Who knows what will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Can only speak for myself and my family but none of us have seen anyone. We've not mixed with anyone since December 2nd in fact and that was outdoors.

As a family we took the decision some time ago to have separate Christmases and for ages I've only been to work, to the supermarket or met people outside.

Unfortunately it would appear that not everybody has been of the same mind. I live in Northamptonshire which was Tier 2 before Christmas but neighbouring Beds & Bucks - both put into Tier 4. The main road through the village runs from Bedford to Northampton and on Christmas Eve was busier than rush hour with, presumably, people from tier 4 shopping/socialising in Tier 2; local shopping centres had been rammed since the Tier 4 announcement. 

Christmas Eve night I went to the pub to pick up a takeaway, the restaurant part was absolutely rammed; "are these all locals?" I enquired. "Well they say they are and only give mobile numbers for contact tracing but we know that they've come from Tier 4 but we have to take them at their word can't do anything about it" was the resigned reply from the landlady.

I think that the majority of people have been sensible but that a significant enough minority couldn't give a f***.

Post Xmas spike and national lockdown (but not called that because that would need a vote in parliament) incoming. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Damn. That’s not great. 
 

Seems to be a mixed bag then. Who knows what will happen.

I mean i guess schools could balance it out. Honestly think it's worth delaying schools opening until transmissions are lower, could be the thing that keeps the virus a little more under control until a vaccine. Now we know there's a end in sight, we can play for the dsruption to education. Though obviously not ideal 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We aren’t exactly in a good position going into Christmas, currently 30k cases a day and this is over the holiday period when reporting is lower. I would think that the Christmas mixing will only increase the numbers further. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Losing my hair said:

As a family we took the decision some time ago to have separate Christmases and for ages I've only been to work, to the supermarket or met people outside.

Unfortunately it would appear that not everybody has been of the same mind. I live in Northamptonshire which was Tier 2 before Christmas but neighbouring Beds & Bucks - both put into Tier 4. The main road through the village runs from Bedford to Northampton and on Christmas Eve was busier than rush hour with, presumably, people from tier 4 shopping/socialising in Tier 2; local shopping centres had been rammed since the Tier 4 announcement. 

Christmas Eve night I went to the pub to pick up a takeaway, the restaurant part was absolutely rammed; "are these all locals?" I enquired. "Well they say they are and only give mobile numbers for contact tracing but we know that they've come from Tier 4 but we have to take them at their word can't do anything about it" was the resigned reply from the landlady.

I think that the majority of people have been sensible but that a significant enough minority couldn't give a f***.

Post Xmas spike and national lockdown (but not called that because that would need a vote in parliament) incoming. 

Surely as you’ve got to be seated and eat in Tier 2, pubs can only be ‘full’ (which they more than likely would’ve been regardless of neighbouring tiers) as opposed to ‘rammed’?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...