Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

Neymar slammed in Brazil after PSG star 'hosts 500 PEOPLE at a five-day festive party complete with an underground disco' as South American country's coronavirus death toll surpasses 190,000.

The footballer had a disco built with acoustic protection in an annexe of a mansion in Mangaratiba on Rio's famous Green Coast to stop neighbours hearing the noise, according to Brazilian newspaper O Globo.

The mega bash is said to have started on December 25 and is due to continue until the New Year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Surely as you’ve got to be seated and eat in Tier 2, pubs can only be ‘full’ (which they more than likely would’ve been regardless of neighbouring tiers) as opposed to ‘rammed’?

Well if we want to be pedantic then I should have said that all the available tables were taken. However the precise wording doesn't take away from the point that from what I have observed, enough people in Tier 4 were travelling into the neighbouring Tier 2 area to increase the risk of infection levels rising. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Redwinevino said:

Zero chance, Northern Ireland are in what is basically Tier 5 - same as Tier 4 with  no outdoor exercise with people outside your own household allowed, for 6 weeks from Boxing Day - with a review after 4.

One week of tighter restrictions to begin with. No household mixing outside is only until end of NYD. Presumably to combat Xmas mixing and control NY parties. You can then mix outside and private gardens in limited numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt42 said:

Right. Back to business.

Is there any chance that Christmas transmission may be lower than expected? I’m going to give anecdotal evidence here but from the people in my family / I know virtually everyone has stayed behind very closed doors this Christmas. Even those which travelled / escaped London it’s not like they’ve been about.

Apart from solo country walks I’ve not interacted with anyone else but my household. I can’t imagine hundreds have descended on tier 2 pubs either - or I haven’t seen much evidence of it.

Yes there may be some household mixing issues but even people I know that I would categorise as frequent rule breakers seem to have been quite well behaved this Christmas. 

Have always thought that with schools closed, people off work, businesses closed, people staying in and by and large forming natural bubbles anyway, that Christmas wouldn’t be quite the super-spreader event some have.

The big unknown and spoiler to that is the new strain- all the additional movement will have spread it far out of the south east. We just don’t know how  much worse it is yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

What did you get? I’ve got the Star Wars Cantina to build

I got a Lego chess set which I've built really enjoyed it. I'm planning on treating myself to the Lego colosseum at somepoint but it's not cheap!

I wasn't sure if I was in the Lego shop on Christmas morning as pretty much every present the 10 year old unwrapped was Lego. The biggest of which is the Hogwarts castle so I've been trying to work out where that can fit when it's complete. 

I was tempted to treat myself to the Cantina at somepoint it looks great and it's an excuse to play the music! I'm just struggling for space in my home office to keep it all now. 

IMG-20201227-WA0004.jpeg

Edited by RobertProsineckisLighter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

Have always thought that with schools closed, people off work, businesses closed, people staying in and by and large forming natural bubbles anyway, that Christmas wouldn’t be quite the super-spreader event some have.

The big unknown and spoiler to that is the new strain- all the additional movement will have spread it far out of the south east. We just don’t know how  much worse it is yet.

I agree. Mixing increasing in some areas but massively decreasing elsewhere.

As with so many moments in this pandemic, it’ll be near impossible to say for sure either way because there are so, so many elements that affect case numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To answer someone else’s question re: Oxford pages and pages back, it appears they have rerun trials on the half/full dose and gotten that to 95% efficacy. 

I’m guessing the article in the Mail is suggesting that end-Feb is when restrictions will START to get rolled back, but that it’ll be a gradual process probably taking around 2-3 months, being studied closely along the way. 

Edited by Mellotr0n
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mellotr0n said:

To answer someone else’s question re: Oxford pages and pages back, it appears they have rerun trials on the half/full dose and gotten that to 95% efficacy. 

I’m guessing the article in the Mail is suggesting that end-Feb is when restrictions will START to get rolled back, but that it’ll be a gradual process probably taking around 2-3 months, being studied closely along the way. 

The government themselves have said that these restrictions are pretty much in place through the winter till Easter time. At that stage I would think we’ll see gradual easing through into the summer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

The government themselves have said that these restrictions are pretty much in place through the winter till Easter time. At that stage I would think we’ll see gradual easing through into the summer. 

I think the Tier system will stay for a while yet.

But what we’ve seen over and over again is that the situation can change quite rapidly, in either direction.  

Unlikely perhaps, but if deaths and hospitalisations start plummeting from Feb, the pressure to ease some restrictions will be overwhelming. 

What we’ve also seen - over and over again - is the majority of people saying with certainty how things will be in a few months time often end up with egg on their face. 

Edited by Mellotr0n
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mellotr0n said:

To answer someone else’s question re: Oxford pages and pages back, it appears they have rerun trials on the half/full dose and gotten that to 95% efficacy. 

I’m guessing the article in the Mail is suggesting that end-Feb is when restrictions will START to get rolled back, but that it’ll be a gradual process probably taking around 2-3 months, being studied closely along the way. 

That was my guess, but I didn't have any hard evidence for it. Where did you get your info? One of the paywalled articles?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think at some point after January/February the government have to throw the public a bone in terms of publicly easing something. It's the relentless endlessness of this that means a lot people's mental health is in the toilet, and why a lot of people are giving up on complying with stuff because it's simply been too tough and too long at this point.

Having some end in sight, and saying – look, we're easing this one thing but we're keeping the rest for now until we've made sure a bunch more people are vaccinated so please remember hands/face/space – is going to be really useful for everyone, I think. Keeping the public in the dark and confused about an exit strategy is only going to fuck people's heads up this winter.

Edited by jannybruck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mellotr0n said:

I think the Tier system will stay for a while yet.

But what we’ve seen over and over again is that the situation can change quite rapidly, in either direction.  

Unlikely perhaps, but if deaths and hospitalisations start plummeting from Feb, the pressure to ease some restrictions will be overwhelming. 

What we’ve also seen - over and over again - is the majority of people saying with certainty how things will be in a few months time often end up with egg on their face. 

Remember the evil backbenchers have that 2nd February date etched in their memories for a ‘sunset’ on these restrictions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jannybruck said:

I think at some point after January/February the government have to throw the public a bone in terms of publicly easing something. It's the relentless endlessness of this that means a lot people's mental health is in the toilet, and why a lot of people are giving up on complying with stuff because it's simply been too tough and too long at this point.

Having some end in sight, and saying – look, we're easing this one thing but we're keeping the rest for now until we've made sure a bunch more people are vaccinated so please remember hands/face/space – is going to be really useful for everyone, I think. Keeping the public in the dark and confused about an exit strategy is only going to fuck people's heads up this winter.

They have that from one of the last press conferences when Boris said Easter. An extra month given it's still winter will probably be needed, we might get a relaxation of the the tiers that an area is in but up until Easter we'll more or less still be in the tiering system.

This is also another thing it's not about throwing the public a bone, if the virus is still out of control and tighter measures are needed then they should be in place. It shouldn't be about rewarding the public it should be about loosening measures when it's safe to do so. The restrictions aren't a punishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stuartbert two hats said:

That was my guess, but I didn't have any hard evidence for it. Where did you get your info? One of the paywalled articles?

I don't understand the medical specifics at all of what the trials are actually doing, but the Phase 3 Oxford/AZ data we've seen so far (that was criticised for being a bit patchwork) was all from the original trials run by Oxford themselves - NCT04400838 and ISRCTN89951424.

Since then, AstraZeneca have started a separate large scale Phase 3 trial - NCT04516746, and presumably if there's a significant change in efficacy then that's where any new data is coming from. Though again I don't know what makes that trial different in medical or dosage terms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, jannybruck said:

I think at some point after January/February the government have to throw the public a bone in terms of publicly easing something. It's the relentless endlessness of this that means a lot people's mental health is in the toilet, and why a lot of people are giving up on complying with stuff because it's simply been too tough and too long at this point.

Having some end in sight, and saying – look, we're easing this one thing but we're keeping the rest for now until we've made sure a bunch more people are vaccinated so please remember hands/face/space – is going to be really useful for everyone, I think. Keeping the public in the dark and confused about an exit strategy is only going to fuck people's heads up this winter.

You would hope - once Oxford is approved - the Government will start to plot a clearer course for a timeline towards normality, to keep everyone sticking with the restrictions in the meantime.

Not based on dates, but on metrics - once hosps, deaths, case rates get to a certain level with a clear drop, once vaccinations hit a certain level and are showing a certain % of efficacy.   

You’d hope. 

Edited by Mellotr0n
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My sons car has been fixed. In case anyone cares....... it was merely a loose oil sump plug. But I took the opportunity to change the oil, oil and air filter, and spark plugs. All free of charge. It’s what Dads do. He stayed indoors but has put the dinner on. Not that any of that has anything to do with this thread, but I did promise an update.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

They have that from one of the last press conferences when Boris said Easter. An extra month given it's still winter will probably be needed, we might get a relaxation of the the tiers that an area is in but up until Easter we'll more or less still be in the tiering system.

This is also another thing it's not about throwing the public a bone, if the virus is still out of control and tighter measures are needed then they should be in place. It shouldn't be about rewarding the public it should be about loosening measures when it's safe to do so. The restrictions aren't a punishment.

They are punishing for people to endure.  And if they are unenforceable, people won't go along with them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mellotr0n said:

You would hope - once Oxford is approved - the Government will start to plot a clearer course for a timeline towards normality, to keep everyone sticking with the restrictions in the meantime.

Not based on dates, but on metrics - once hosps, deaths, case rates get to a certain level with a clear drop, once vaccinations hit a certain level and are showing a certain % of efficacy.   

You’d hope. 

They won’t be do that, if they did then people would clamour for the restrictions to be relaxed when those metrics are achieved. They haven’t set those targets in public yet and probably won’t start now. They’ve given a deadline but because it’s not short enough people are ignoring it and looking for another one.

 

2 minutes ago, zahidf said:

They are punishing for people to endure.  And if they are unenforceable, people won't go along with them

I am aware, we’ve all had to endure them. But they aren’t actually a punishment and people have been sticking to them in the main. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...