Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
8 hours ago, xxialac said:

Wow. Absolutely riddled with bogus statements.

but also some true ones.

My aging mother signed a DNR while in hospital for something non-covid/non-life-threatening during the summer. It wasn't something she went in there thinking "while I'm here I'll sign an DNR".

While I'm happy for my mother to (still) make decisions like that for herself, that's probably not the case for everyone that must have been talked to about a DNR.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

a lockdown to lessen the chaos of brexit.

It's almost like this is how they planned things. 

Next you’ll be saying the earth is flat 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

but also some true ones.

My aging mother signed a DNR while in hospital for something non-covid/non-life-threatening during the summer. It wasn't something she went in there thinking "while I'm here I'll sign an DNR".

While I'm happy for my mother to (still) make decisions like that for herself, that's probably not the case for everyone that must have been talked to about a DNR.

I agree with that. 

Then again given the 10,000 word count, I'd expect some truth.

When you exaggerate so wildly, you weaken the good arguments you do have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 minutes ago, xxialac said:

I agree with that. 

Then again given the 10,000 word count, I'd expect some truth.

When you exaggerate so wildly, you weaken the good arguments you do have.

Oh, I agree.

I highlighted that part only because it's something which has largely gone under the public's radar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, xxialac said:

I agree with that. 

Then again given the 10,000 word count, I'd expect some truth.

When you exaggerate so wildly, you weaken the good arguments you do have.

Or, if you're a good liar like Trump, who sprinkle your bullshit with some nuggets of truth 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, incident said:

"the number of people dying today is the same as it would be any other year in total"

A "data scientist" should really learn to read data.

image.thumb.png.516ce948e84734f2aed0040121742290.png

Thank you for that chart. That vid is doing the rounds here in Leicester as he is from our University - it was really annoying me as I was sure it had been reported that there are definitely excess deaths this year and I was trying to find a easily understandable visual to show this. I’m definitely on the side of free speech/opinions but to blatantly misreport proven facts really pi**ed me off! It’s not so bad when it’s a random ‘Joe Bloggs’ attempting to mislead but we should hold a Professor of Genetics and Bioinformatics Group Leader at the University to greater and higher standards 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, philipsteak said:

Lets hope its more accurate than their weather reporting.

Yes, though we are due the ‘worst winter ever ahead, Snow chaos, Arctic conditions until may’ or ‘Diana, the true story’ headlines that the express usually produces when they can’t be arsed finding a proper story to lead with. At least I’m encouraged by the enthusiasm of the normally reticent scientists on tv this morning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Radiochicken said:

Putting this kinda stuff in the media now to calm the hordes because it’s actually going to be a few more weeks before Phase 3 results start being shared?

It does potentially seem that way.

I was pinning my hopes on the big news coming in the next week but sounds like I need to calm down...!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, gordong said:

While I am increasingly optimistic for next year, does anyone else think June is slightly too soon? If they moved it to September as was previously rumoured, I reckon it’s almost a certainty. 

See the website update to include a resale on the resale thread 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

but also some true ones.

My aging mother signed a DNR while in hospital for something non-covid/non-life-threatening during the summer. It wasn't something she went in there thinking "while I'm here I'll sign an DNR".

While I'm happy for my mother to (still) make decisions like that for herself, that's probably not the case for everyone that must have been talked to about a DNR.

I'm not a medic and am no expert in this area but a friend of mine is NHS national lead for DNACPR and Advance end of life care plans for admitted patients promoting open discussions between families and individuals so as to remove any ambiguity and reconcile medical decisions with the wishes of an individual etc.

It only applies to CPR and it's not about withdrawing any other treatments, so a very narrow scope.

DNACPRs (as they are now called) can, and are, ultimately the sole decision of a doctor to make in the patients best interest. Normally written up though after discussion with patient, and family if desired. Sometimes people just refuse to face up to such discussions.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...