Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Hot Chip


suzie sue

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, LostHorizon said:

With all the talk being of the Chems/Hot Chip clash, I’m starting to wonder will anyone actually be at the Killers...

Chems for me (but I’m lucky and have HC a few weeks later)

Wu Tang as well.

Hot Chip are big on this board but when push comes to shove, I think they may struggle a bit up against all the Saturday night competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, eastynh said:

Wu Tang as well.

Hot Chip are big on this board but when push comes to shove, I think they may struggle a bit up against all the Saturday night competition.

Yes, the people on this board have better taste than your average punter. ?

Edited by HotChipWillBreakYourLegs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Ddiamondd said:

Let’s not forget Hot Chip on West Holts was pretty sparsely attended at the start before the party got started in earnest. If you took a sample from this forum, you’d think it was one of the all time great performances on the farm...

The demographic here definitely skews 25 and up - probably majority 30-40 year olds - and at the dedicated / nerdy end of the spectrum. Not a real representation.

The Killers will still absolutely wallop every other competing stage for turnout and buzz.

This mans right. It’s the Coldplay phenomenon. If you believed this forum there’d be nobody there except a few people booing. In reality they usually eat everyone else’s lunch, crowd-wise. Same with the Las Vegas Duran Duran, it’ll be between them and Kylie for biggest crowd of the weekend.

 

Like many others on here I won’t be there to verify that statement as I’ll probably be at the Chems. I love the ‘Chip but I think they might struggle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, HotChipWillBreakYourLegs said:

Yes, the people on this board have better taste than your average punter. ?

I used to agree with your sentiment till I witnessed members on here watching Adele over New Order ??‍♂️?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mpdow2 said:

Any chance of getting close for Hot Chip if you do that

Not really, though there is usually a lot of untapped space if you go round to the back and to the left of the park stage (everyone just files in on the right side like sheep). Think it is all going to come down to on the day. I don't know which way I will go....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ddiamondd said:

Let’s not forget Hot Chip on West Holts was pretty sparsely attended at the start before the party got started in earnest. If you took a sample from this forum, you’d think it was one of the all time great performances on the farm...

The demographic here definitely skews 25 and up - probably majority 30-40 year olds - and at the dedicated / nerdy end of the spectrum. Not a real representation.

The Killers will still absolutely wallop every other competing stage for turnout and buzz.

That's pretty much the exact kind of people I saw in Gorilla when Hot Chip played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, briddj said:

Not really, though there is usually a lot of untapped space if you go round to the back and to the left of the park stage (everyone just files in on the right side like sheep). Think it is all going to come down to on the day. I don't know which way I will go....

Agree. Let the mood decide on the day. Is very tempting to start at the Chems then sprint over. Have 2 mates definitely at Hot Chip so hopefully could sneak into where they are. Then again at just love the atmosphere at Chems so much I never leave. 

At the very least Chems will finish before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we think the Ally Pally gig will sell out tomorrow? Money is tight this month for obvious reasons, so I'd prefer to wait, but maybe that's a silly idea? It's twice the size of Brixton Academy, have they doubled in popularity since then?

Edited by StLewi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would it be plausible to catch the first 30 mins of The Killers (from the back) then make it over in time for Hot Chip? Can't remember how long the walk is from Pyramid to Park. Assuming it's dry ground!

Edited by Johnkhutch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Johnkhutch said:

Would it be plausible to catch the first 30 mins of The Killers (from the back) then make it over in time for Hot Chip? Can't remember how long the walk is from Pyramid to Park. Assuming it's dry ground!

It's possible, but it's a fair old trek. And you'd have to walk past the Other when the Chems are on, which'll be pretty busy.

Unless you head up through Williams Green, past Leftfield and the Glade and come in that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Woffy said:

It's possible, but it's a fair old trek. And you'd have to walk past the Other when the Chems are on, which'll be pretty busy.

Unless you head up through Williams Green, past Leftfield and the Glade and come in that way.

Nice one cheers Woffy will keep it in mind!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ricci's Special Kebabs said:

Are the Pre-Sale codes unique?

Any chance of PMing me if not.

https://alexandrapalaceevents.seetickets.com/event/hot-chip/alexandra-palace/1388057?pre=appre&src=appresale&dm_i=3I8H%2CKZKA%2C91RAD%2C29T86%2C1&fbclid=IwAR05VUNWYUwV4uDlqzQiyJMLhHjyJgu9alFkk-QZyKECyHCRmNdsgy2tUdM

 

I don't think it will sell out that quickly (if it does at all).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...