Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Stage Predictions


dentalplan

Recommended Posts

Is Stormzy genuinely ready to headline? He may be Grime's biggest star but I'm not sure he'd hold on to a large crowd at the Pyramid. He's no megastar like Kanye/Jay Z and doesn't have much of a back catalogue. It was dispiriting seeing the empty OS for BBK last year. Kudos for trying something different though (if true).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mattymooz said:

I mean the tour still sold out and grossed $95 million. Cheek To Cheek wasnt a big amash either she was just doing some more experimenting and looking at the collaborators for her next album she's going back to her roots.

Heck people always complain we aint getting any new headliners but someone as big as Gaga is too small? People think someone like Stormzy would sell better than Gaga?

We don't just want smaller headliners. We want more interesting, risky headliners and up and coming acts. Not acts who are past their peak.

4 minutes ago, Mattymooz said:

I mean in that instance you could say the same about Madonna, her last big hit was what, Hung Up?

Gaga with a new pop album coming out as well as a movie and las vegas recidency, why not now? Shes doing fine in that regard imo. Sure no hit song recently but thats the only thing she aint got going for her. Shes got a good back catalogue so could fill a whole hour, relatively popular with most people (due to Cheek To Cheek and Joanne being relatively well acceoted with older & rock/jazz/country fans) and will have newer material to play too

Madonna is a slightly different prospect to Gaga. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mattymooz said:

I mean in that instance you could say the same about Madonna, her last big hit was what, Hung Up?

Gaga with a new pop album coming out as well as a movie and las vegas recidency, why not now? Shes doing fine in that regard imo. Sure no hit song recently but thats the only thing she aint got going for her. Shes got a good back catalogue so could fill a whole hour, relatively popular with most people (due to Cheek To Cheek and Joanne being relatively well acceoted with older & rock/jazz/country fans) and will have newer material to play too

Madonna is Madonna. Lady Gaga looked like she was gonna be the next Madonna before she fucked it and released a couple of shitty albums and has yet to recover from this slump. Definitely can't see her being booked to headline any time soon because of that.

1 minute ago, henry bear said:

Is Stormzy genuinely ready to headline? He may be Grime's biggest star but I'm not sure he'd hold on to a large crowd at the Pyramid. He's no megastar like Kanye/Jay Z and doesn't have much of a back catalogue. It was dispiriting seeing the empty OS for BBK last year. Kudos for trying something different though (if true).

He's pretty big and has a reputation for being great live too. He wouldn't pull the biggest crowd by some margin but neither would it be embarrassingly small. Assuming he'd have a new album out and a bunch more hits from said album I can see a headline set from him going down pretty damn well, and probably a lot better than Kanye and Jay Z before him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, henry bear said:

Is Stormzy genuinely ready to headline? He may be Grime's biggest star but I'm not sure he'd hold on to a large crowd at the Pyramid. He's no megastar like Kanye/Jay Z and doesn't have much of a back catalogue. It was dispiriting seeing the empty OS for BBK last year. Kudos for trying something different though (if true).

As someone who knows fuck all about Grime, Id never heard of BBK. (Id heard of the individual parts) just never knew they were a group. Stormzy is bigger, a recognisable face  & much more cross over. Give him a go I say.

--------

Arctic Monkeys

Stormzy

Madonna

Rock n Roll, Grime, Pop

Something for a lot of people there

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FuzzyDunlop said:

Can madonna headline is like saying could the stones?

Neither had a hit in years. Madonna isn't a star, she's an icon. How many of those are left?

 

Wouldn't even be remotely interested in seeing her, but this comment is bang on the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno it just seems silly to me, Gaga has been one of the biggest and influential artists of the past 10 years or so (only others that I can think of that are on her level are Rihanna, Kanye and T Swizzle).

She'd probably be on the cheaper end too as I agree she would be coming out if a bit of a slump, but she's also an act I'd have no doubt would take the pay cut to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Mattymooz said:

I mean in that instance you could say the same about Madonna, her last big hit was what, Hung Up?

Gaga with a new pop album coming out as well as a movie and las vegas recidency, why not now? Shes doing fine in that regard imo. Sure no hit song recently but thats the only thing she aint got going for her. Shes got a good back catalogue so could fill a whole hour, relatively popular with most people (due to Cheek To Cheek and Joanne being relatively well acceoted with older & rock/jazz/country fans) and will have newer material to play too

Madonna has a 30 year career featuring some of the biggest pop bangers ever made to fall back on. Gaga has one album that everyone knows and a handful of other singles. It’s not really a comparison.

FWIW I’d happily see Gaga in a sub slot, but a 2019 headliner she is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FloorFiller said:

Madonna is Madonna. Lady Gaga looked like she was gonna be the next Madonna before she fucked it and released a couple of shitty albums and has yet to recover from this slump. Definitely can't see her being booked to headline any time soon because of that.

All pop stars have a point where the crowd moves on, female pop stars in particular. Madonna's career is littered with slumps, flops and commercially unappealing projects, but she made her legacy by standing firm and reminding the world of the arsenal of hits that she has. I see no reason why Gaga can't do the same and I actually think her Superbowl and Coachella slots are testament to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, henry bear said:

Gaga's last album sold pretty much the same as Stormzy's in the UK - 130k.

Stormzy isn't going to headline I doubt, he's done an academy tour and headlined Wireless which is even at the biggest artists they book for it headlining Other at the max. I could see him doing the spot Dizzee Rascal did twice but to be honest he'd be perfect for closing out Other like C&S did. R&L are way more likely to take a punt on him as a co-headliner. I think there will be one co-headliner as there seems too many options for it not too and a couple that may not get an outright but Stormzy is not the size and status of Kendrick that will get an outright yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/21/2018 at 10:32 AM, Hugh Jass said:

Wembley Arena isn't a bad shout actually.

If they sell out Wembley Arena after Ally Pally and The Roundhouse on the same tour then fair play to them. 

Other headliners in 2020 (with a new album) would seem right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, dentalplan said:

All pop stars have a point where the crowd moves on, female pop stars in particular. Madonna's career is littered with slumps, flops and commercially unappealing projects, but she made her legacy by standing firm and reminding the world of the arsenal of hits that she has. I see no reason why Gaga can't do the same and I actually think her Superbowl and Coachella slots are testament to this.

Quite.  You can pick out some absolute turd from Madge's back catalogue if you go through it.  Her survival has very much been about recognising when she's been slumping or pissing everyone off, and reacting accordingly. Look at early to mid 90s, Erotica and all the gumpf that went with it had actually started to damage her so the response was the much softer Bedtime Stories and the Something to Remember compilation. Gone a bit quiet again? Shift tempo and drop Ray Of Light.

Something to Remember came out 10 years after Madonna, which is about where Gaga is in her timeline after The Fame.  Like you sid, no reason why she can't / won't do the same. Based on Ray Of Light I'm predicting an absolute belter from Gaga in the next couple of years.

Edited by Quark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Quark said:

Quite.  You can pick out some absolute turd from Madge's back catalogue if you go through it.  Her survival has very much been about recognising when she's been slumping or pissing everyone off, and reacting accordingly. Look at early to mid 90s, Erotica and all the gumpf that went with it had actually started to damage her so the response was the much softer Bedtime Stories and the Something to Remember compilation. Gone a bit quiet again? Shift tempo and drop Ray Of Light.

Something to Remember came out 10 years after Madonna, which is about where Gaga is in her timeline after The Fame.  Like you sid, no reason why she can't / won't do the same. Based on Ray Of Light I'm predicting an absolute belter from Gaga in the next couple of years.

And if she does come back with an absolute belter then by all means have her headline. My point remains that right now she is not headliner material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...