Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Tour Announcements & Upcoming Gigs


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Heather90 said:

The Eagles have dates in June. However, it looks like they don't do consecutive dates any more so unlikely 

June - 26th Manchester, 28 Birmingham, 30 Liverpool

July - 2 Leeds, 4 Glasgow 6 Dublin

Plus June 23 at Wembley Stadium with Sheryl Crow. Tickets start at £70 and top out at £200 plus fees.

...ouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DownboundTrain52 said:

Plus June 23 at Wembley Stadium with Sheryl Crow. Tickets start at £70 and top out at £200 plus fees.

...ouch.

This will 100% sell out. My dad has paid £150 in the past for them. 

Bit of a shame with the dates as I'll either be at Glastonbury or living out of the country. Doesn't seem the parents can be temped to one of the European dates at this point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Heather90 said:

This will 100% sell out. My dad has paid £150 in the past for them. 

Bit of a shame with the dates as I'll either be at Glastonbury or living out of the country. Doesn't seem the parents can be temped to one of the European dates at this point

I think we paid one of the lower prices for the Leeds gig a few years ago, which had the side effect of us being right at the wall of the arena. My folks were less than impressed given that even the lower prices weren't cheap.

Great gig though. It felt like you got your money's worth and that's not always the case these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Heather90 said:

The Eagles have dates in June. However, it looks like they don't do consecutive dates any more so unlikely

However, that does put Sheryl Crow in the country at Festival time and she may be more realistic after a well received set at IOW this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, incident said:

However, that does put Sheryl Crow in the country at Festival time and she may be more realistic after a well received set at IOW this year.

If it makes you happy....

I did say I wanted more country so I'd definitely go along. Nice chilled early afternoon slot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, buffy394 said:

Catfish and the Bottlemen have nearly sold out Wembley this morning. Tour is in Jan but they will be there somewhere 

Yeah I'm going for 3rd down Pyramid for them I think. They've sold out Wembley bar about a seat, not sure on Belfast and Dublin but England wise it's all sold bar the odd seat. If they were on Other, they are easily subbing that but I don't see Other for a 3rd time running.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Chef said:

Say what you like about Take That but to sell out all those nights in a couple of minutes is impressive. Especially with the prices and its only 60% of the original line up. 

I could say many things about Take That and the cretin that is Gary Barlow but they have a fan base and not one that would be at Glastonbury IMO. Plus he's a massive Tory and has taken issue with Michael and the left wing side of the festival before so he can jog on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Doug85 said:

I could say many things about Take That and the cretin that is Gary Barlow but they have a fan base and not one that would be at Glastonbury IMO. Plus he's a massive Tory and has taken issue with Michael and the left wing side of the festival before so he can jog on. 

Disagree on their fanbase not being at Glasto. The consensus on here is that Kylie would/will go down a storm and draw a huge crowd, could easily see the same for Take That. I doubt there are many fans on here, but I bet most would recognise the majority of their hits.

They'd get a massive crowd if they were to ever play the legends slot. Possibly even the biggest we've seen for that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
4 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Disagree on their fanbase not being at Glasto. The consensus on here is that Kylie would/will go down a storm and draw a huge crowd, could easily see the same for Take That. I doubt there are many fans on here, but I bet most would recognise the majority of their hits.

They'd get a massive crowd if they were to ever play the legends slot. Possibly even the biggest we've seen for that time.

word I've heard is that it's very unlikely to ever happen, as Gary Barlow doesn't want to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Disagree on their fanbase not being at Glasto. The consensus on here is that Kylie would/will go down a storm and draw a huge crowd, could easily see the same for Take That. I doubt there are many fans on here, but I bet most would recognise the majority of their hits.

They'd get a massive crowd if they were to ever play the legends slot. Possibly even the biggest we've seen for that time.

Like i say they defo have a fanbase, just depends on whether they would be at Glasto or not when they would be more likely to go see them at their own tour??

 

4 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

word I've heard is that it's very unlikely to ever happen, as Gary Barlow doesn't want to do it.

Is that because of his political views or just because he only cares about the £££ and his tax bill?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Gilgamesh69 said:

I thought the general consensus of Eagles was that they are terrible live nowadays?

Nah they've Freys son in singing. Sound pretty much the same. 

Henleys has lost a bit of range and power but he is 71. 

 Unlikely but a Saturday afternoon Jackson Brown type slot would work. 60 mins of hits.

Jeffrey Lebowski will not be attending obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Doug85 said:

Like i say they defo have a fanbase, just depends on whether they would be at Glasto or not when they would be more likely to go see them at their own tour??

Doesn't matter if their fanbase is there or not. How many hardcore Dolly Parton or Lionel Ritchie fans were at their sets? Take That are a huge name and if they were to play (not saying they should) they'd draw a huge crowd of people who wouldn't pay to see them, especially if they played a non-headliner slot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Gilgamesh69 said:

I thought the general consensus of Eagles was that they are terrible live nowadays?

I saw them in Cardiff in 2006. It was very much a going through the motions gig. Take the money and run. The highlight for me was easily Joe Walsh doing Life’s Been Good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Doesn't matter if their fanbase is there or not. How many hardcore Dolly Parton or Lionel Ritchie fans were at their sets? Take That are a huge name and if they were to play (not saying they should) they'd draw a huge crowd of people who wouldn't pay to see them, especially if they played a non-headliner slot. 

Fair point, I think its difficult to look beyond the fact that i can't stand them and I hoped that they would have disappeared by now. Hopefully the fact that Barlow is such a greedy twat they will never play anyway 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, buffy394 said:

Catfish and the Bottlemen have nearly sold out Wembley this morning. Tour is in Jan but they will be there somewhere 

The Wembley date was on sale months ago, and has been rescheduled to fit in with this tour. So 95% of the tickets would have already been gone before this morning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
4 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

That surprises me, for someone who comes across as financially savvy (certainly when it comes to tax law) you'd think he'd see the benefit of a high profile set there.

it's probably not that financially savvy. Unlike most bands I reckon they've already rung every penny they're likely to get from music sales, and they'll be getting much more for their own shows than they would a show at Glasto.

But anyway, as I understand it, he simply feels its the wrong sort of place for them to be playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Latest Activity

    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...