Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, JoBalls said:

I’m sure at this stage Glastonbury aren’t so out if options that they would resort to settling - remember 2015 when The Who cancelled a show in France to headline?! 

Yeah but The Who were actually around to step in. There don’t seem to be many big suitable names so far that are tearing through Europe in the summer. We’re at a point where Bon Iver and Travis Scott are considered big headliners by fests that usually share a headline act or two with Glasto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, mike46 said:

Despite being a big fan, I’ve just not been able to get excited about the strokes headlining but having had a few beers this evening and watched this whole set, I’m now all for it.

Sure, it might be very early album heavy but that run of songs at the end, on the Pyramid, with a typical Glasto enthusiastic crowd...sign me up!

 

 

When the gammons find out Paul McCartney has been replace with The Strokes.

Screenshot_20190117-232337_YouTube.thumb.jpg.df060b50ebb90c3b7a37b00a75636273.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Gucci Piggy said:

When the gammons find out Paul McCartney has been replace with The Strokes.

Gammons are gonna be happier with a band who's frontman looks like an actual hunk of gammon with a wig and sunglasses stuck on it than that bleeding heart vegan commie liberal Paul McCartney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mezhyp1 said:

Having been to Rock Werchter I can confirm it's got as much charisma and personality as Michael Gove's foosty arse

It'd be the designated driver 

went in 2017 with high hopes - could not agree more with ye man

Plus the lineup is more top heavy than Katie Price

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Keithy said:

Gaga has a countdown on her Instagram....

Screenshot_20190117-231959_Instagram.thumb.jpg.512aad2d29da165747afb23d734565bd.jpg

It's almost certainly a countdown to some new Vegas dates being announced....

But...but...

Either way, new dates might fill that summer gap and close the Glastonbury door.

No... its a countdown to her 1st Vegas show. Tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

Gammons are gonna be happier with a band who's frontman looks like an actual hunk of gammon with a wig and sunglasses stuck on it than that bleeding heart vegan commie liberal Paul McCartney

Macca played the Queen's Diamond Jubilee. Doubt any of the gammons have a clue he's a vegan. I didn't even know he was a vegan and most of my friends are vegans who eat his wife's food all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dentalplan said:

He’s a contender. We were told by a poster with a good track record that Liam was putting his hat in the ring for a headline slot a couple of months ago - something that didn’t make sense when we thought all three headline berths were sorted - but whether it was accepted was never further reported.

I’d like to think they’d never go for that seeing as no one really gives a fuck about his solo stuff and his popularity will only wane until the Oasis reunion rolls in, but he does tick a few boxes.

Ah fuck

I didn’t think of Liam at all but now can totally see it. It reminds me a lot of 2013 when we kinda speculated around an act that threw their hat into the ring very early (Mumford), and we doubted their size until they appeared on the poster.

i really don’t think booking him as a headliner would be that controversial either.

i guess we have more info for the strokes than Liam though. 

It’s funny, if you think of it this way we have three (reasonable) contenders to take the slot; The Strokes, The Killers, Liam - (when it seemed like we could barely think of an act), turns out there are options, they just might not be what we really want

Despite the strokes info, something is pulling me to the killers and I don’t know why. Just a gut feeling

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
7 hours ago, dentalplan said:

He’s a contender. We were told by a poster with a good track record that Liam was putting his hat in the ring for a headline slot a couple of months ago - something that didn’t make sense when we thought all three headline berths were sorted - but whether it was accepted was never further reported.

I’d like to think they’d never go for that seeing as no one really gives a fuck about his solo stuff and his popularity will only wane until the Oasis reunion rolls in, but he does tick a few boxes.

he's only a contender if things have been moved around due to someone backing out.

Remember, the later-confirmed juice had him subbing Stormzy.

 

7 hours ago, Gucci Piggy said:

When the gammons find out Paul McCartney has been replace with The Strokes.

bet there's plenty of gammon strokes fans. You don't get more gammon that mainstream acts (even if they were only mainstream for 5 minutes).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Ah fuck

I didn’t think of Liam at all but now can totally see it. It reminds me a lot of 2013 when we kinda speculated around an act that threw their hat into the ring very early (Mumford), and we doubted their size until they appeared on the poster.

i really don’t think booking him as a headliner would be that controversial either.

i guess we have more info for the strokes than Liam though. 

It’s funny, if you think of it this way we have three (reasonable) contenders to take the slot; The Strokes, The Killers, Liam - (when it seemed like we could barely think of an act), turns out there are options, they just might not be what we really want

Despite the strokes info, something is pulling me to the killers and I don’t know why. Just a gut feeling

There’s nothing for The Killers though. Other than that they’re playing in Texas in May, which is more or less irrelevant because they never stop playing shows. There’s no apparent reason for them to come back to Europe.

IMO you have The Strokes and LG with info, RHCP and more to come who’ll be about Europe, Gaga who might fall into the special appearance thing (see Sheeran, Adele) and then The Killers, KOL who are active elsewhere in the world with no big reason to come back over.

57 minutes ago, vintagelaureate said:

It was mentioned on here straight after 2017, that The Killers had been booked to headline (wasn't there even a thread on it?).

No that was a prediction from a fan.

51 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

he's only a contender if things have been moved around due to someone backing out.

True but the way that was presented, it seemed he was bowling for a late replacement slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nysmaw said:

Would anyone be so kind and explain what it means to be a gammon for those of us who are not native English speakers? I’m quite confused :D

It’s to do with having bigoted beliefs, normally impacted by patriotism, but it’s been hijacked by these losers who want to make people feel bad about the music they like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so I was into The Killers just as much as anybody back when we all had souls but weren't soldiers. "What a clever line" I thought. And then it got old. And their second album was a bit whatever. I realized some soldiers didnt have souls and some non soldiers DID have souls and that line with just nonsense. And then I went through life not thinking about The Killers. 

Well I saw them in September and holy shit I'd love to see them on the Pyramid. Honestly one of the most entertaining acts I've seen. 

It's gotta be Daft Punk though right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a Twitter account that gained many followers by pointing out gammon behaviour.

A while ago it tweeted that there was no real music any more, not like there used to be. I responded that it was a gammonesque tweet and they blocked me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

it's something that got made up for older brexiters who get so worked up about it they make themselves red in the face.

One particular question time led to the 'wall of gammon' meme online, when a bunch of old white guys were shouting until they were red in the face about how we needed to nuke Iran, to the confusion and disgust of a young female student.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MetaKate said:

Well I saw them in September and holy shit I'd love to see them on the Pyramid. Honestly one of the most entertaining acts I've seen. 

It's gotta be Daft Punk though right?

I missed the Killers gig at Glastonbury for a bit of a closer-fuck of a reason....then me and two friends (who LOVE The Killers) got tickets to see them in Sheffield in December 2017. And OMG they were one of the most boring acts I've ever seen. Maybe I expected too much after hearing how amazing they'd been on the JP. At the end, my massive-Killer's-fan friend turned to me and said, "rather unbelievably, Blink 182 were WAY better".....

Daft Punk though I'm 100% down with. And as they are also a "couple of guys", we basically have info on them already ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...